nice little reminder
Can’t believe America did this.
nice little reminder
Jeez, if you're gonna post that at least make sure you write the word if before the sentence.
You do mean if, don't you...?
They didn't cancel the election when there was a civil war.Nah he has not even tested positive yet.
If USA hits Italy numbers they can push back or cancel the elections. Trump is doing fine, the media panic makes him look good.
This "immunity herd" stuff (eg UK) I hear about seems like a huge gamble. There are no guarantees it will work. We have no knowledge of how long immunity will last after recovery, or the mutation rate of the virus. And there are already reports of different strains of covid-19. I feel like this could backfire.
They didn't cancel the election when there was a civil war.
1864 United States presidential election - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Or WW2 (and the President was literally dying of a virus back then too).
1944 United States presidential election - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I'm from Paraguay but my girlfriend had a serious case of the flu in early January, she did a few tests to see if it was dengue and it wasn't. We had thousands of dengue cases around here around that time. A week later my aunt had the same case. Epic flu, no dengue.
I thought about a few times and it does makes sense... What else could have been then? I slept next to her for that week and it was awful to witness. I did not have any symptoms.
This would create unnecessary antagonism between the community. It's better for those features to remain private.
I had this exact thing. Crackling sounds in my lungs too which I've never had before. Took a full 4 weeks to fully shift.
Yeah, did last about 4 weeks as well. Know quite a few people who had that.
Maybe this is why the UK isn't panicing. Maybe we had Corona, or something very similar, hit us in December at the same time that the Chinese had it.
At my work, at least 25% of people were off at a time, rolling over 3 weeks including Christmas. Everybody felt achy and shitty at some point. Some (the older lot) had coughs that they couldn't shift and tight chests. Those with coughs were put on 4 weeks of strong anti-biotics.
The Dr's told them it was an unusual flu-like virus, that was stronger than the seasonal flu. Not saying the Dr's were in cahoots in a conspiracy, it just sounded like they were even surprised by it.
Well, with something this complex there of course aren't going to be any guarantees, but generally and historically speaking, this is how most diseases operate.
That's because the flu mutates a lot.Except things like the seasonal flu ...
Bit off-topic briefly.
Is this image true? If it is, holy shit, I never knew lol
That's because the flu mutates a lot.
but what was Germany doing the last month/month and a half to keep their deaths so low? They have the sixth most cases in the world, 5th outside of China but their deaths are way down on the list.
That is a normal phenomenon within the realm of possibiliity for what the flu does from time to time. No reason to think that we actually were exposed to COVID19 a lot earlier than currently estimated until there is enough evidence to warrant that conclusion.Maybe this is why the UK isn't panicing. Maybe we had Corona, or something very similar, hit us in December at the same time that the Chinese had it.
At my work, at least 25% of people were off at a time, rolling over 3 weeks including Christmas. Everybody felt achy and shitty at some point. Some (the older lot) had coughs that they couldn't shift and tight chests. Those with coughs were put on 4 weeks of strong anti-biotics.
The Dr's told them it was an unusual flu-like virus, that was stronger than the seasonal flu. Not saying the Dr's were in cahoots in a conspiracy, it just sounded like they were even surprised by it.
I thought your point was that the UK approach is a huge gamble?Yeah, that was my point.
In terms of "we let people die and save money in more ways than one" or "we develop immunity"?
No, because there's 0 guarantee the latter is real.
Oh, now I got what you meant.
My take is... rather pessimistic.
S.Korea, with MASSIVE number of tests and formidable health services, achieved slightly below 1% mortality rate.
Germany, on the other hand, is still in "steep climbing" mode, with many yet untested infected running around loose.
It's just... it takes time for people to start dying en mass, while you are this early in epidemic.
The UK is taking absolutely the right approach for two big reasons.
1. Our approach is not dependent on the existence or otherwise of a vaccine. Other approaches simply won't work if a vaccine is not delivered sufficiently quickly.
2. Our approach will leave us in far better shape for the next pandemic, and yes I believe there will be one.
The UK is playing the long game and leaving the panicking to others.
Fair enough, but note that if people got infected just in the recent few days (figure tripled over 3 days), not much could be said about mortality rate just yet.Cases will probably go up, but the death rate depends on how many old people get it.
I thought your point was that the UK approach is a huge gamble?
I was told that, on top of not acting early enough, medical personal didn't handle it right and got a number of doctors infected.I'm trying to follow this as closely as I can, but I don't remember reading anything about steps Italy took to contain when it first popped up. Did Italy fail to act in the beginning or is it just that bad over there because of the aged population and connection to Wuhan?
What I'm saying is that it's not as huge a gamble as you think it is. It's a reasonable approach based on known knowns and history. "what if it mutates rapidly", "what if there are multiple strains", and "what if people don't maintain immunity" are points that are still only speculation and not proven. Historically speaking, these "what ifs" are exceptions to the rule.Yes? I'm not sure what you're not getting.
If everyone in the UK got corona, you would know it. The hospitals would’ve been massively overloaded.
That is a normal phenomenon within the realm of possibiliity for what the flu does from time to time. No reason to think that we actually were exposed to COVID19 a lot earlier than currently estimated until there is enough evidence to warrant that conclusion.
If we could find old blood samples and test them for COVID19 antibodies, then I might be convinced.
I have no idea, and I am unaware of anyone seeking that kind of information.No disagreeing with what you're saying. Have you seen the blood samples of the 21 that have died in the U.K.? Did they die because of Corona, or did they die while infected with Corona?
I have no idea, and I am unaware of anyone seeking that kind of information.
"Lockdown Parties" LMAO
It's been known for a long time now.
Fair enough, but note that if people got infected just in the recent few days (figure tripled over 3 days), not much could be said about mortality rate just yet.
France reporting 838 new cases BNO has not posted it yet but I think it is real from the other tracker
Beats me. We're still gathering as much information as we can. As long as there's a bottleneck in actual testing we really don't know what the true numbers of infected are. We can keep track of deaths since that's pretty obvious, of course, but different countries have different standards of recording and classification, so that could contribute to information discrepancies.Neither am I. Which is a shame because I feel like it's a question worth asking and worth answering. Is the death toll being inflated by false numbers or is it lower than it really is?
Nah he has not even tested positive yet.
If USA hits Italy numbers they can push back or cancel the elections. Trump is doing fine, the media panic makes him look good.
Is this true? I’ve read conflicting info. Droplets which can stay airborne until gravity makes them fall (6-10 feet dispersal or X seconds) are one thing, but aerosolization is another. Is there any official documentation (CDC, WHO, Korean/Italian authorities) which states that this can be aerosolized?
My job just closed all global offices and allowed everyone to work from home for at least the next few weeks, so I’m not too concerned for myself, but my parents and wife are at greater risk (the latter due to commuting in NYC via train and the former due to age/immunodeficiency). So whether it’s aerosolized is important to know, because then they’ll need to wear the N95 masks when in public in addition to avoiding unnecessary social contact.
Someone with a time machine correct me if I am wrong but didn't Italy report 250 dead yesterday?
So 175 if thats the total update is a decline.
They still have a shit ton of cases but thats probably because more people are being tested. Focusing on the deaths IMO is a more key indicator.
The real answer about this lockdown will be if they can continue to contain 75% of it in that one city. If they can keep it there and prevent nationwide spread their efforts though late will not be for nothing.
175 is new deaths. Total 1441.
175 is added to the total of 1441 deaths.
Is this true? I’ve read conflicting info. Droplets which can stay airborne until gravity makes them fall (6-10 feet dispersal or X seconds) are one thing, but aerosolization is another. Is there any official documentation (CDC, WHO, Korean/Italian authorities) which states that this can be aerosolized?
My job just closed all global offices and allowed everyone to work from home for at least the next few weeks, so I’m not too concerned for myself, but my parents and wife are at greater risk (the latter due to commuting in NYC via train and the former due to age/immunodeficiency). So whether it’s aerosolized is important to know, because then they’ll need to wear the N95 masks when in public in addition to avoiding unnecessary social contact.
Italy tends to be a single count. Spain seems to have multiple figures per day.yes I know. I mean yesterday new deaths was 250. So today its 175. decrease of 75 New deaths. fewer people died today than yesterday?
Of course I might have my numbers wrong or there will be a second Italy update?
To delay or cancel elections, it requires congressional act, and even then it HAS to take place by December 14th. Beyond that it would take editing the constitution which would require majority vote by BOTH the House and Congress, which won't happen.
Aerosolization just means the bacteria can attach to air molecules and be carried. It's effectively the same thing as what you'd listed. The weight of the virus while attached to the air causes it to drop at around 10 ft. Think of it like a feather. It's very existence means that if you drop it it'll fall to the ground, but if you blow on it (in this case, your breath being the air molecules) it'll go a few more feet but will still ultimate succumb to gravity and hit the ground.