autoduelist
Member
Regarding that UK tweet about Italy vs. Uk strategies...
What's 'cool' about that isn't if that dude is legit, or even correct. It's that he is identifying different tactics for handling pandemic at all, because that means other people who are in control are likely doing the same thing, trying to turn on and off zones as best possible to meet whatever tactics their government has chosen. It feels odd to be part of some grand experiment, and of course some plans will work better than others [containment vs intentional spread, etc] but it's great that we have 200ish governments all instituting various plans. Better than 1 picking the wrong plan. And we will have an incredible amount of knowledge gained from evaluating each plan for years to come to better deal with the next pandemic.
Don't be too harsh on the experts. Some will be wrong. But all have dedicated their lives to dealing with just such an outbreak.
------
Also... why do i keep seeing in articles that China has it under control. How does that make sense? Even if they have the Wuhan region under control how are they escaping the rest of their country having the same cycle at this point?
Italy is 60 million people.
US is 330 million.
If we can keep to their numbers, despite our size and number of outbreak zones, it would seem to me that we are doing better. While it makes sense for early numbers to line up [1 patient spreads formulaicly], I would think that at some point our population would have more disparate outbreak zones/spreaders and our numbers would eventually greatly outpace Italy at similar time marks. [Tho i have no idea by how much, or when the numbers would start to diverge]. Tho i suppose population density would also need to be figured in. Hard to compare such different countries.
What's 'cool' about that isn't if that dude is legit, or even correct. It's that he is identifying different tactics for handling pandemic at all, because that means other people who are in control are likely doing the same thing, trying to turn on and off zones as best possible to meet whatever tactics their government has chosen. It feels odd to be part of some grand experiment, and of course some plans will work better than others [containment vs intentional spread, etc] but it's great that we have 200ish governments all instituting various plans. Better than 1 picking the wrong plan. And we will have an incredible amount of knowledge gained from evaluating each plan for years to come to better deal with the next pandemic.
Don't be too harsh on the experts. Some will be wrong. But all have dedicated their lives to dealing with just such an outbreak.
------
Also... why do i keep seeing in articles that China has it under control. How does that make sense? Even if they have the Wuhan region under control how are they escaping the rest of their country having the same cycle at this point?
This is very telling
Italy is 60 million people.
US is 330 million.
If we can keep to their numbers, despite our size and number of outbreak zones, it would seem to me that we are doing better. While it makes sense for early numbers to line up [1 patient spreads formulaicly], I would think that at some point our population would have more disparate outbreak zones/spreaders and our numbers would eventually greatly outpace Italy at similar time marks. [Tho i have no idea by how much, or when the numbers would start to diverge]. Tho i suppose population density would also need to be figured in. Hard to compare such different countries.
Last edited: