Mass Effect 3 SPOILER THREAD: LOTS OF SPECULATION FROM EVERYONE

Status
Not open for further replies.
Because all of your examples are human vs. human.

lol. Again, that's like saying "but all are previous examples of civil rights were of straight people, gays are different!" You're going to have to explain why being human versus synthetic is an important distinction that is insurmountable beyond "it is."
 
Seriously though, EDI was a very tongue-in-cheek joke. She's like a 60's robot bombshell. Her design is retro as hell. I mean, even the part where the body is acquired with Dr. Eva has that Bond music playing as she's about to get away.

I get that but I just feel that it doesn't fit well with ME 3's gritty-as-hell, fuck-we're-all-gonna-die, Shepard-must-become-the-space-messiah setting. I think I'm warming up to the Joker/EDI relationship on the basis that upon second thought, Joker is a loser with too much porn and probably would bone the first willing quasi-female. But I still think turning it into a romance trivialized their epic tale of overcoming prejudice and fear from ME 2.
 
There's another instance of a synthetic/organic war, the Metanic War -or whatever was called- that Javik mentioned. The Protheans won.

So in two instances organics could easily survive a synthetic war (one by plain old winning the war, the other by brokering peace).

You only have the reaper's word to think that this war is inevitably lost by the organics, but the reapers may as well be lying.

Hard evidence points to organics being safe from synths that are not the reapers. Dubious witnesses say that they are not.

e: there's also that VI civilization in ME2 that's 100% pacific.

Woah there, what VI civilization?

edit: oh hang on, I have some vague planet scan popping into my memory. Yes, I seem to recall coming across this thing, but it was hardly a civ., I thought.

(and I got the impression the Protheans were still at war, that's why they "united" until the reapers started shooting)
 
Sure, but the game never states that Synthesis is the "all in one" solution that brings peace. The Catalyst says "there is another option" and allows you to choose which you think is the best solution for enduring peace and breaking the cycle. The only one he truly condemns is the one to destroy all synthetic life as he feels it's the quickest path back to establishing the same cycle.

That's the point I'm going for, The Catalyst states that the reapers purpose is to prevent synthetics form killing all the organics, that's why they come by every 50,000 years and kill all the advanced races. He states that now the Reaper plan has failed and can no longer work as they can now be defeated by the organics (destruction). He then offers two alternatives, my point is that these alternatives are not solutions at all, because they fail to stop the organic vs synthetic or in the case of the synthesis ending hybrid vs. synthetic war from happening. The only way to ensure that this war wont happen is ironically killing all the organics.
 
Yet in all tons 3 colored scenarios, everyone dies except for creepy gramps, some kid, and possibly the Normandy crew. If you think the people on/around Earth survived, check out the Codex entry for "Desperate Measures".

Maybe the destruction of the mass relays is different when sent from the Citadel? This isn't just a "bombard the mass relays" thing.

We all know all Mass Effect thread will inevitably lead to one singular picture. The cycle has happened more times than we can imagine.
till you guys are developed enough and we can live in peace believing this is an awesome ending. :P
 
Exactly, people are using the Geth as the final evidence that the Catalyst was wrong.

No, it's merely evidence that it's possible to get along and therefore it is not inevitable that synthetics will destroy organics. If you think other synthetics will necessarily be created that are evil, then you're going to have argue why.
 
Almighty said:
Eh the entire series well at least since 2 pretty much tries to show that all AI's won't necessarily kill all organics. So while that kid may or may not have a point it does run counter to that. I think that is where a lot of the hate come from well among other things.
The problem is that if you don't establish sympathy for synthetic life, the choice at the end becomes fairly meaningless. If the Geth weren't pushed into conflict and were the aggressors why would I have any interest in preserving them? You're given the ability to dispense with them in general during the game during the Quarian conflict but the game does need to show that synthetic life is worth preserving thus proving the Catalyst wrong...

littleworm said:
He then offers two alternatives, my point is that these alternatives are not solutions at all, because they fail to stop the organic vs synthetic or in the case of the synthesis ending hybrid vs. synthetic war from happening. The only way to ensure that this war wont happen is ironically killing all the organics.
A measure he seems to be actively avoiding of course hence why synthesis is viewed as the next possible step forward. Not the guaranteed end to the cycle.
 
lol. Again, that's like saying "but all are previous examples of civil rights were of straight people, gays are different!" You're going to have to explain why being human versus synthetic is an important distinction that is insurmountable beyond "it is."

Really?
 
Maybe the destruction of the mass relays is different when sent from the Citadel? This isn't just a "bombard the mass relays" thing.


till you guys are developed enough and we can live in peace believing this is an awesome ending. :P

Maybe. That way only millions die. And the Quarians are Genocided. Fuck it, probably billions. I'm pretty goddamn sure there isn't enough food for whatever is left of the 8billion humans on earth plus all the Asari and Krogan visitors.
 
No, it's merely evidence that it's possible to get along and therefore it is not inevitable that synthetics will destroy organics. If you think other synthetics will necessarily be created that are evil, then you're going to have argue why.

Because the catalyst saw and said so. Now tell me your evidence that synthetics will all be like the Geth and act friendly towards organics from now on.,


I suppose I don't have an option of saying fuck that and continuing to fight against it with my allied forces?
No, but you can pick a color.
Maybe. That way only millions die. And the Quarians are Genocided. Fuck it, probably billions. I'm pretty goddamn sure there isn't enough food for whatever is left of the 8billion humans on earth plus all the Asari and Krogan visitors.
We can always send them to Mars.
 
I personally think the Synthetic ending is the final solution for the galaxy. Just because the Geth are ready to live peacefully doesn't mean another synthetic race can't be developed in the future that would fuck everything up and prove the Catalyst correct.
Though it's what I also chose, it's not really presented as the best option. Also, as others have mentioned, it rises several ethical concerns. In any case, it's one of the offered solutions, but it's not actually the best. If you decide to control the Reapers you could rebuild Mass Relays since you'd have the knowledge in your database, create yourself a body like that of EDI/EVA, and walk around like you always have.

Then you could fend off any bad synthetic lifeforms if they get out of line. However, again why does the universe need a cop? But that's the primary reason why the Reapers are idiotic. They think they're doing the best for everyone without acknowledging what they're doing is not always right.
 
Maybe. That way only millions die. And the Quarians are Genocided. Fuck it, probably billions. I'm pretty goddamn sure there isn't enough food for whatever is left of the 8billion humans on earth plus all the Asari and Krogan visitors.

Earth probably depends on extensive importing just to feed its population (not to mention all the stations it must have set up around the solar system). Every planet that can't sustain its population is going to get fucked.
 

Yes, I'm afraid if you want your opinion to be taken seriously, you'll have to provide a valid argument for it instead of "This is different therefore they must kill each other." What about being synthetic makes the difference insurmountable in coexisting?
 
Still better than getting massacred by the Reapers.

True. It still feels like you failed though. Sure you didn't do the absolute worse that you could of. Just slightly better. The whole known galaxy that you were trying to save is now gone as you know it. I guess best way to put it.
 
Maybe the destruction of the mass relays is different when sent from the Citadel? This isn't just a "bombard the mass relays" thing.

Based on the evidence presented in the two previous games, there's nothing to state why it should be any different.

Also, maybe is an ambiguous term that even Mac wants you to use. We are left with no fucking clue as to why any of it happened. Which is what adds to the ending being complete shit writing.
 
Earth probably depends on extensive importing just to feed its population (not to mention all the stations it must have set up around the solar system). Every planet that can't sustain its population is going to get fucked.

So do the colonies. They will just go dark. Maybe they can eat Reaper corpses.

Edit: Yeah, you kind of said that, sorry. Planets like Eden Prime basically support the entire human population. So those few millions still on Eden Prime will probably be fine. Everybody else, you are fucked.
 
Because the catalyst saw and said so. Now tell me your evidence that synthetics will all be like the Geth and act friendly towards organics from now on.,

The catalyst may be lying, though.

Chances are he is trying to save his sorry ass from the crucible.
 
Though it's what I also chose, it's not really presented as the best option. Also, as others have mentioned, it rises several ethical concerns. In any case, it's one of the offered solutions, but it's not actually the best. If you decide to control the Reapers you could rebuild Mass Relays since you'd have the knowledge in your database, create yourself a body like that of EDI/EVA, and walk around like you always have.

It does raise ethical concerns, for sure. You could still rebuild the Mass Relays with the synthetic ending though.

hateradio said:
Then you could fend off any bad synthetic lifeforms if they get out of line. However, again why does the universe need a cop? But that's the primary reason why the Reapers are idiotic. They think they're doing the best for everyone without acknowledging what they're doing is not always right.

What if a synthetic comes along that can destroy your technology? I would love to hear more backstory for the creation of the Reapers.
 
That's the point I'm going for, The Catalyst states that the reapers purpose is to prevent synthetics form killing all the organics, that's why they come by every 50,000 years and kill all the advanced races. He states that now the Reaper plan has failed and can no longer work as they can now be defeated by the organics (destruction). He then offers two alternatives, my point is that these alternatives are not solutions at all, because they fail to stop the organic vs synthetic or in the case of the synthesis ending hybrid vs. synthetic war from happening. The only way to ensure that this war wont happen is ironically killing all the organics.

Isnt that simply the best the AI can do. I doubt they ever planed for that moment and the AI simply came up with these choices on the fly based on the technology he found. The crucible was not made by the race that made the AI, it would not have chosen those option. So it just chose a few ways that would prolong the AI taking over.
 
Based on the evidence presented in the two previous games, there's nothing to state why it should be any different.

Also, maybe is an ambiguous term that even Mac wants you to use. We are left with no fucking clue as to why any of it happened. Which is what adds to the ending being complete shit writing.

It's space magic. They can say it's a different kind of explosion.

Of course, the problem is that the evidence isn't just presented in ME 1 and 2, but in ME 3 itself, since the Codex has an entry saying that trying to explode the Mass Relays to prevent the Reapers from getting to your system is a Very Bad Thing.
 
Based on the evidence presented in the two previous games, there's nothing to state why it should be any different.

Also, maybe is an ambiguous term that even Mac wants you to use. We are left with no fucking clue as to why any of it happened. Which is what adds to the ending being complete shit writing.

I prefer to call it "open" :P To be fair, the evidence in the two previous games never pointed towards a destruction from within. I felt it was more like a deactivation .


Why would the Catalyst even create the Crucible?
He didn't.
 
Karl2177 said:
We are left with no fucking clue as to why any of it happened.
This I somewhat understand as far as complaints go. Who/what is the Catalyst? Why did it create the Crucible and implement its "solution"? Why does "he" get to make these decisions? I think some of the issues would be alleviated if we knew more about its existence and what it has seen throughout the many cycles of its being.

The problem is that as writers, Bioware may have intended to leave that just the way it is so that folks like us can argue it ad nauseam on a game forum.;)
 
Something I just read about the ending on that indoctrination theory forum thingie.
The ending, red or blue, red pill or blue pill. Mac said he wanted the ending to be Matrixy.
Blue pill/ending = control = no waking up in London somehow, red pill/ending = destroy = waking up in London somehow. Red pill = escape to real world, waking up from the Matrix.

Again, obviously not what was intended but still interesting, especially as Walters wanted the ending to be Matrix like.
That makes some sense. If you choose destroy you're back with the possibility that one day some synthetic life forms will try to kill you. However, that's just speculative.

If you choose blue, you enter the matrix and become something else entirely, but everyone else is unaffected because you can save them.

Choosing green is the wildcard. But it has its own problems.
 
Yes, I'm afraid if you want your opinion to be taken seriously, you'll have to provide a valid argument for it instead of "This is different therefore they must kill each other." What about being synthetic makes the difference insurmountable in coexisting?

I should take your opinion serious when I find it to be moot considering that the gap between synthetics and humans is much more complex? The number one reason against coexisting is that it never has worked. While it could this time, the evidence is hard against it, agree?
 
Geth are not evil.

EDI is not evil.

The VI civ from ME2 is not evil.

Why would the galaxy create a new, non-geth based synthetic race? They didn't bother in creating a new FTL system and accepted the one they were given. They didn't replace the keepers and let the citadel run itself. All of them run the same omnitools. If they need synthetics, they will use the geth.

And even if they didn't there's no guarantee the new synthetics will go all terminators on them.

The Catalyst is just racist.
 
I prefer to call it "open" :P To be fair, the evidence in the two previous games never pointed towards a destruction from within. I felt it was more like a deactivation.
Open is one way. Lots of speculation is another. In any case, it's not a good way to end your series. At the end of Return of the Jedi were you wondering in great detail about everything else?

This I somewhat understand as far as complaints go. Who/what is the Catalyst? Why did it create the Crucible and implement its "solution"? Why does "he" get to make these decisions? I think some of the issues would be alleviated if we knew more about its existence and what it has seen throughout the many cycles of its being.

The problem is that as writers, Bioware may have intended to leave that just the way it is so that folks like us can argue it ad nauseam on a game forum.;)

Success!
 
This I somewhat understand as far as complaints go. Who/what is the Catalyst? Why did it create the Crucible and implement its "solution"? Why does "he" get to make these decisions? I think some of the issues would be alleviated if we knew more about its existence and what it has seen throughout the many cycles of its being.

The problem is that as writers, Bioware may have intended to leave that just the way it is so that folks like us can argue it ad nauseam on a game forum.;)

That is left for Bioware to explain in future games, books, etc.
 
Isnt that simply the best the AI can do. I doubt they ever planed for that moment and the AI simply came up with these choices on the fly based on the technology he found. The crucible was not made by the race that made the AI, it would not have chosen those option. So it just chose a few ways that would prolong the AI taking over.

Assuming what he says is true, why not just act as the enforcer of peace? Why couldn't they simply enforce peace between the Quarians and the Geth, through a means of M.A.D. Get along or we kill both of you.
 
Because the catalyst saw and said so. Now tell me your evidence that synthetics will all be like the Geth and act friendly towards organics from now on.,



No, but you can pick a color.

We can always send them to Mars.



I see we're back to saying it's so, so it must be. Maybe we should write a story where humanity decides to go to war with an alien race because they have purple hair. When the readers ask why humanity would start a war over something like that, we can say, "because that's how we wrote it." No need for a logical explanation people, in our story we've just decided that this will be an insurmountable difference!


The reason future synthetics can coexist is because you don't make an advanced being that is so stupid it's just war mongering. It's a remarkably childish notion to kill merely because things are different. And quite honestly, if you're making sentient AI, you have a really good handle on how intelligence works and so if you really wanted, you could even instill safe guards on the AI. As someone who does research in AI the notion of computers that "suddenly" become sentient and evil is remarkably stupid and such an idea has no concept of what it would mean for us to be able to create intelligent sentient beings.
 
What if a synthetic comes along that can destroy your technology? I would love to hear more backstory for the creation of the Reapers.
You'll never get that back story because the conversation has to remain "High Level."

Also, what if if no synthetic comes along to destroy my technology? You can't speculate on the future.
 
Bunch of different races worked on the Crucible. They were just all wiped out by the Reaps before they could finish it up, so it went on to the next cycle. Until HUMANS.

However, the question should be, why didn't the Catalyst ever do anything about it? Dude isn't too quick on the uptake.
 
I will never let anyone eat Marauder Shields.

Thanks, bro.

How is space magic even an option. I really don't understand how the Crucible works, but I'm pretty sure the goal was just to fuck up the reapers. They built in a space magic button?

Or the catalyst always had the power to space magic our problems away? If that is the case, why didn't he just build his own crucible?
 
Part of the weirdness, I think, is that you can control just the Reapers...or you can wipe out all synthetic life? How is that really an equivalent choice?

It makes you decide if you want to uphold a buddy-buddy relationship with the Geth or if Sheppard dies,but he might die anyway soooooo........
 
Part of the weirdness, I think, is that you can control just the Reapers...or you can wipe out all synthetic life? How is that really an equivalent choice?

I'm a big fan of the Geth. But they were a necessary sacrifice so I could murder Vent Kid.

Also, apparently Bioware fucked up coding, and sometimes EDI will come out during the destory ending. I'm sure some Geth made it.
 
Why would the Catalyst even create the Crucible?

He didn't.

When humans finally put the citadel inside the crucible, they have check mated the reapers.

Organics won.

What happens next is that the catalyst tries a final gambit by trying to trick shepard into letting them go, or at least, letting them fuse organics and synthetics via their space magic. But the crucible still does its intended goal, and destroys the citadel and the mass relays.
 
Bunch of different races worked on the Crucible. They were just all wiped out by the Reaps before they could finish it up, so it went on to the next cycle. Until HUMANS.

However, the question should be, why didn't the Catalyst ever do anything about it? Dude isn't too quick on the uptake.

How did the previous species even know about the Catalyst? Then to top it off, it's some vent hoodie kid... Protheans were smoking some good stuff to know that would help the fight against the Reapers.

How did they move the Citadel to Earth? Does it have engines?

I have asked this so many times. Nothing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom