Pollux
Member
Problem solved: Everyone's dead, Joker escaped the death beam and gets to play Adam and Eve with EDI (and the rest of the female squad members...).
Jacob's dad would be so jealous
Problem solved: Everyone's dead, Joker escaped the death beam and gets to play Adam and Eve with EDI (and the rest of the female squad members...).
I see.
Well they did a great job of explaining that...
Nothing but corridors the entire game, but to take the final choice in the game you have to take a fucking forked path to make your decission.
Link pleas can't find it on twitter
Which ending did you get?
lol jk
The thing about the Mass Relays exploding has been covered several times, but it was nice to read this from the codex in the ACTUAL game.
![]()
I also like that the first sentence negates what Shepard did in Arrival and thus killed a whole colony of Batarians for no fucking reason in the narrative.
So everyone dies in the game.
Perfect.
Jacob's dad would be so jealous
So wait...wouldn't this completely debunk the "indocrinated" theory? (before today when it was officially debunked)![]()
Oh god, this one's great
So wait...wouldn't this completely debunk the "indocrinated" theory? (before today when it was officially debunked)
Mass Relays blow up, everyone dies.
The End, thanks for playing.
soo to save everyone, we end up killing nearly everyone?
Words cannot describe....The thing about the Mass Relays exploding has been covered several times, but it was nice to read this from the codex in the ACTUAL game.
![]()
I also like that the first sentence negates what Shepard did in Arrival and thus killed a whole colony of Batarians for no fucking reason in the narrative.
I already asked, but didn't seem to get any reply, but how does this controversy affect the sales of ME3?
They kill everyone if your EMS is not high enough-nobody comes out of the ship lolIf the "RBG" explosions killed everyone, the planet Joker landed on in the synthesis ending would've been destroyed instead of filled with half organic, half synthetic plants.
In other words, the RBG explosions were space magic life altering explosions instead of purely destructive explosions like the relay bursting apart in Arrival.
I already asked, but didn't seem to get any reply, but how does this controversy affect the sales of ME3?
I already asked, but didn't seem to get any reply, but how does this controversy affect the sales of ME3?
It was already posted in the heyday of the Indoctrination theory (2 days ago or something)
The controversy is only happening now so there's no way to tell. The current sacking of Rome will die down and the lingering bitterness will be the deciding factor on how it effects sale. 90%+ of people complaining already own the game, and are long time fans heavily invested in the series and thus likely to be the most burnt. New players, and new buyers, may not react to the ending the same way, or even give a shit about supposed ending controversy, if they hear about it at all.
BioWare's response to the matter will be the more interesting factor.
Just started replaying Dragon Age, and God that game feels deep coming right from ME3.
Well that's just false.I keep reading people saying the combat is alot better in ME3, but its exactly the same as ME2! I mean exactly, the shooting is a little smoother and the cover mechanic a bit better, but in terms of strategy it has all the same powers they do all the same things, sure they branch a bit but it really doesn't effect gameplay at all. You could say it gives you a little more choice? but there is no added depth what so ever.
There's no reason to assume that the relay systems survive after the relay blows up.
So everyone dies in the game.
Perfect.
And on that note, someone needs to make flavoured drinks: Control Berry, Destroy Cherry, and Synthesis Lime.
If the "RBG" explosions killed everyone, the planet Joker landed on in the synthesis ending would've been destroyed instead of filled with half organic, half synthetic plants.
In other words, the RBG explosions were space magic life altering explosions instead of purely destructive explosions like the relay bursting apart in Arrival.
- Casey: 'Everyone is going to have a different ending to some degree based on their choices and their galactic readiness, so it wass important for me to have one final scene where everyone has the exact same experience.'
And on that note, someone needs to make flavoured drinks: Control Berry, Destroy Cherry, and Synthesis Lime.
AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAH
The controversy is only happening now so there's no way to tell. The current sacking of Rome will die down and the lingering bitterness will be the deciding factor on how it effects sale. 90%+ of people complaining already own the game, and are long time fans heavily invested in the series and thus likely to be the most burnt. New players, and new buyers, may not react to the ending the same way, or even give a shit about supposed ending controversy, if they hear about it at all.
BioWare's response to the matter will be the more interesting factor.
Word of mouth. However, game sales are extremely front loaded, so probably not that much of an effect.
Possibly reduced DLC sales from disappointed fans.
Possibly lower sales of future Bioware Games, particularly future Mass Effect games.
From his wiki page?AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAH
From his wiki page?
From his wiki page?
If you listened to the Catalyst, he DID SAY that "THIS CYCLE WILL END"
Basically, BioWare. Anyone who was surprised by how this ended has never played a BioWare game.AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAH
Holy mother of kroganFrom the app, so, he actually said it.
Basically, BioWare. Anyone who was surprised by how this ended has never played a BioWare game.![]()
You would think that Harbinger would have stayed behind to make sure Shepard was actually dead, let alone not making sure both Shepard and Anderson make it through. Instead, he's like "Okay, I'm out. Marauder Shields, guard the beam transmitter with great valiance!"
I already asked, but didn't seem to get any reply, but how does this controversy affect the sales of ME3?
I've only played mass effectBasically, BioWare. Anyone who was surprised by how this ended has never played a BioWare game.![]()
I really cannot believe that writing process was deemed acceptable at Bioware. That's honestly shameful. Telling a vague story is one thing, fishing for one is just the sign of a piss poor story.
I'm sort of tempted to just buy copies of Story and The Making of a Story and mail them en masse to Bioware, haha.
PsychoWard23 said:and a nice meaty epilogue too, which detailed almost every choice that matters
The reason that Bioware is being asked to provide a different ending is threefold:
1) A lot of people really, really, really don't like the current ending, enough to personally engage the author(s) about it (this happens all the time in other mediums).
2) Like it or not, video games are now considered a media that changes a lot after release, with DLC, expansion packs, patches, etc. They are not considered to be a static form of media.
3) Bioware has a history of 'crowd-pleasing'.
Basically, BioWare. Anyone who was surprised by how this ended has never played a BioWare game.![]()
BioWare has had a pretty good track record with KotOR and Mass Effect. Origins, as said, was great as well. BioWare's only real missteps were potentially this ending (I have yet to play through it, but I haven't shielded myself from the ending controversy - I'm just trying to keep an unbiased outlook until I see it for myself) and DA2 (and that Sonic game).