Keepin it professional, whatever the hell that means.Why does he recommend you beat the game before you read this? He says absolutely nothing.
Keepin it professional, whatever the hell that means.Why does he recommend you beat the game before you read this? He says absolutely nothing.
-snip
Why does he recommend you beat the game before you read this? He says absolutely nothing.
Holy shit. That is the finest solution I've heard all day.
We just disagree fundamentally about the nature of literary criticism. I disagree entirely with the bolded, and as I said before that's fine. We're just proponents of two opposing academic theories. I would just warn you about equating speculation that cannot be falsified with a conflicting interpretation, especially if the author's come out and said that's not what we wrote the ending to be. Even if they made a new game and it started out with a VO saying Shepard was not indoctrinated, you could just argue that new game was still part of the indoctrination. At a certain point your theory becomes self-fulfilling.
The Citadel Code got a firmware update due to the Crucible. That's all.
What's new in Citadel VI "Space Kid" 2.0:
- Space Magic
- Three Color Schemes: Red, Green, Blue.
- Options on saying "Wake up." or "Why are you here?"
So that you don't hate him?
It's a non-answer but I guess understandable given his position.
I'm not sure why he'd bother to answer when he said nothing :/
You know what is funny? Another PR tool that I know is completely factual is to respond to a criticism or complicated issue on a Friday late afternoon when the news cycle is at it's slowest, and the stock markets are closed. Companies hope the weekend of busy partying fun makes the issue disappear, and fickle masses forget, and they also hope the shareholders are forgetful come Monday morning.
I was just waiting to say I bet someone at EA/Bioware makes a comment tonight, but I honestly thought it was a week early and would happen next Friday.
What are you even talking about?
You have understood like..nothing of what was shown. There was no doomsday device.
Because it wouldn't leave us to speculate. Get on the line!I really don't get why the fuck that single piece of dialouge changes. Some say it was because of uniting the Geth and Quarian but if the AI/game acknowledges that then why can't we bring it up in defence of synthetics?
To me they are both renegade.. both destroy lifeOne thing I will give the indoctrination theories is that the Red/Blue switcharoo at the end there with Illusive Man and Anderson seems somewhat odd.
Well, the Crucible was the doomsday device. To be used in a doomsday scenario.
And you would think if aliens, bit by bit, each contributed to the creation of the device someone somewhere during its construction would have implemented a firing mechanism to shoot the thing either from a distance or automatically once everything was all linked up.
And why does the Crucible have three separate options for its use? I'm pretty sure no one designing it thought it would be good to have one guy in control of the reapers.
Well, the reason I believe the indoctrination theory works so well is because there are many, many hints about it, to the point where it becomes overwhelming. I do admit that at some point, you just start seeing the patterns everywhere. But what gets me is the way they handled the destruction ending in a different way than the synthesis or control ending. ESPECIALLY when Shepard survives at the end. Subtle things like the music that article mentioned or that the good choice is made by the villain of the game while the bad one is made by the noblest of characters. Why would they do that if they didn't intend it? I don't know, they probably just didn't think about it. But because they did do that, it helps make the interpretation more valid in my eyes. As it stands, the indoctrination theory makes sense because I can see how they are trying to get shepard to act in a way that benefits them.
1 said:
2 said:
I sense the speculation strong in this oneSo Shepard is in the middle of this big explosion
and Shepard survived this and we see him here
So, Shepard is Superman and the Citadel is made of concrete/Beton... allright.
You're picking and choosing what parts of indoctrination to back up your flimsy theories. Indoctrination also takes days or weeks, while being in a close proximity to reapers. Shepard was only near reapers for minutes, and even Saren broke free long enough to shoot himself at the end of Mass Effect 1, and he had some sort of implants from Sovereign in him.
It's not indoctrination. His eyes changed because it's a lazy texture for synthetic eyeballs. He showed up on Earth because that's the only ending where he isn't disintegrated and they needed to add something else if you had a high EMS. Maybe he survived because as the EMP wave to stop all synthetics was going out, he was teleporting back down the beam of light.
I want to avatar bet or something that it isn't indoctrination, that's how strongly I believe it isn't what happened.
Well, the Crucible was the doomsday device. To be used in a doomsday scenario.
And you would think if aliens, bit by bit, each contributed to the creation of the device someone somewhere during its construction would have implemented a firing mechanism to shoot the thing either from a distance or automatically once everything was all linked up.
And why does the Crucible have three separate options for its use? I'm pretty sure no one designing it thought it would be good to have one guy in control of the reapers.
Mods make it happen!. Our painnnnn , so much pain
So, Shepard is Superman and the Citadel is made of concrete/Beton... allright.
I choose black as the colorwhat if it is a trap. You have too choose between a red,blue and green colored tags.
And two of them lead to a permanent ban and one is you snapping out of indoctrination.
Now we only need too find a mod to play space Casper and marauder shields.
It is just as likely, if not more so, that Bioware are just lazy. And if the indoc theory is true, then Shep is just lying on Earth while the fight is still going on. Nothing is accomplished. This theory just provides hope for those wanting DLC that will explain everything.
The craziest part is:
-The Crucible has been built over countless cycles by countless species, yet somehow the Reapers have either never found out about it or never made unbeatable countermeasures against it despite indoctrinating agents in each species every time.
-They keep "improving" on it even though they have no idea what it's ultimately supposed to do.
If they want me to believe Shepard's DNA is the key to the final evolution of ALL organics, then him surviving that explosion doesn't seem so ridiculous to me.
I guess the answer to my forthcoming question is Space Jesus Did It, but I'll ask anyway.
Why would aliens build a doomsday device without an automatic- or remote trigger? And why would they build such a device and allow for THREE WHOLLY DIFFERENT DOOMSDAY OUTCOMES?
I thought the goal was to destroy the Reapers.
Also, if Space Jesus did it, why would he even bother?
The craziest part is:
-The Crucible has been built over countless cycles by countless species, yet somehow the Reapers have either never found out about it or never made unbeatable countermeasures against it despite indoctrinating agents in each species every time.
-They keep "improving" on it even though they have no idea what it's ultimately supposed to do.
I want to avatar bet or something that it isn't indoctrination, that's how strongly I believe it isn't what happened.
Shepard spent a few days by object rho at the end of ME2 in the arrival DLC. Plus he got "zapped" by it when he first saw it. That still wasn't enough to fully indoctrinate him though, it took harbringer coming face to face with him to actually do it. Like everything else the indoctrinated eyes aren't unarguable proof, they're just further evidence.
He should be disintegrated in every ending. He isn't in the destroy ending for a reason. It's not just because. I love to hate on bioware, but even I can realize they put a lot of thought into the ending. I doubt they put a lot of thought into it and came up with the "obvious" ending that is just plain awful.
Anyways, I'm not going to argue this any further because it's not possible to prove for sure one way or the other.
What's especially hilarious about the Crucible is the way Hackett explains its construction. The thing practically builds itself!One thing that really annoys me about the ending. When I played the from ashes DLC and saw what asshats the Protheans were, I wanted to play through without waking up Javik, and then after everything, in the aftergame, finally go wake him up.
"Oh... The reapers? We already beat them."
"what?"
"oh yeah, it was horrible though, worst few months of our lives."
"M...My people fought them for centuries."
"Oh. That sucks. Well, but that makes sense, we had that superweapon you guys invented that totally wiped them out. I'm sure you'd have won if you finished it."
"Well actually, we didn't invent it.. It uh was passed down from cycle to cycle."
"Huh? You fought for centuries and couldn't finish it? Oh, well, sorry. You're welcome to come on board our ship, enjoy the afterparty."
It's a non-answer but I guess understandable given his position.
I'm not sure why he'd bother to answer when he said nothing :/
In the optional DLC that not everyone did. Things that are optional never really factor into the main story, especially DLC.
The indoctrination isn't a beam, it's an undetectable signal that the reapers emanate anyway.
There's also a big difference between purposely being disintegrated and combined with the reapers or all life, and being kinda in proximity to a non-descript explosion that cuts away before we see what happens.
But whatever, makes more sense the reapers want to play with shepards mind instead of just kill him, when he's half dead and they shot right at him and just spent the past entire game trying to kill him anyway.
If anything, all that happens after Shepard gets blasted by Harbinger is just a dream and not indoctrination. If he was actually inside the Citadel and having imaginary conversations with TIM and Anderson while under indoctrination, how does he end up back in the rubble on the ground? Assuming the "real" ending is when we see him take a breath.
I'm guessing it was a dream, and the DLC picks up after he wakes up.
and shepard need no air? Mhhh... or the "super" Citadel made still some fresh Air only for Shepard after the "super" Citadel broke apart in 1 Trillion concrete/beton blocks![]()
If they want me to believe Shepard's DNA is the key to the final evolution of ALL organics, then him surviving that explosion doesn't seem so ridiculous to me.
I choose black as the color
If you say that is not an option,... well neither was pressing the power button
Except they totally do. That is why you are grounded on Earth and stripped of your rank with your ship taken from you.
Well, the reason I believe the indoctrination theory works so well is because there are many, many hints about it, to the point where it becomes overwhelming. I do admit that at some point, you just start seeing the patterns everywhere. But what gets me is the way they handled the destruction ending in a different way than the synthesis or control ending. ESPECIALLY when Shepard survives at the end. Subtle things like the music that article mentioned or that the good choice is made by the villain of the game while the bad one is made by the noblest of characters. Why would they do that if they didn't intend it? I don't know, they probably just didn't think about it. But because they did do that, it helps make the interpretation more valid in my eyes. As it stands, the indoctrination theory makes sense because I can see how they are trying to get shepard to act in a way that benefits them.
For me, if they continue the series following the absurd sequence of events following the ending or maybe have shepard acting in such a way that is against what the reapers want with no real distinction than if he didn't, then yeah, it's hard to keep believing in it when they are continuing with the line that the ending actually happened. At that point, it wouldn't seem likely to me.
You should also consider how bioware may change. Lets say that they didn't intend the indoctrination theory originally, but they come out with DLC confirming it. What do you do then? Is the indoctrination theory still not applicable since bioware didn't originally intend it?
This could be truely epic. Mods what do you say? Screw TOS I am willing to play, and I will take the ban if I choose wrong. I will hold the line, Tali Zorah vas Normandy.what if it is a trap. You have too choose between a red,blue and green colored tags.
And two of them lead to a permanent ban and one is you snapping out of indoctrination.
Now we only need too find a mod to play space Casper and marauder shields.
I had the choice to replay and in black textwrong you have no choice.. Indoctrinated!!
I'm mothafucking space Casper not even Shepard commander had a choice.
The Crucible was to be used against the reapers, the only missing part was the catalyst, basically a power source.
You're getting the Crucible and the Citadel mixed up, the three different options are on the Citadel. A control panel, a power line, and the beam that combines all life.
No one knows anything about the Crucible, more incredible writing from Bioware. It just looked like a hunk of metal, but it somehow gave the Catalyst new ideas for a solution to the organic problem.
Or, if you didn't do it, you're in trouble because you were working for cerberus.
Shepard has already tried re-entering orbit with unpleasant results though. I doubt Bioware forgot about the major event that started the second game.
Which apparently killed all your previous squadmates in sole surviverOr, if you didn't do it, you're in trouble because you were working for cerberus.
But we've seen him dreaming in the game, very explicitly seen what Shepard dreaming looks like.
We also see what being in close proximity to reaper tech looks like, the effect is even there in mass effect 1 when sovereign takes over saren. You get black squiggly lines across your screen.
And he DEFINITELY didn't start to get indoctrinated before ME3, since the Prothean VI didn't detect anything wrong in him
Based on what your co-caster said, I think it's likely to piss him off too.
What's especially hilarious about the Crucible is the way Hackett explains its construction. The thing practically builds itself!
Even a kid can do it!