Did you try walking all the way? Should've worked, not unless there were other triggers involved like how TIM was handled at the end and the Collector base.
OK guys, I'll leave you to your c̶a̶l̶i̶b̶r̶speculations. I'll be back when Bioware fucks up again (so could be tomorrow!) or when Amir0x finishes the game and finds his way here (LOL).
Edit: But just so you don't miss me, I'll leave you with this:
Jessica Merizan (PR girl) said:
Just so you guys are aware, my Twitter account will no longer be a place to discuss BioWare (at least for now). If you're following me there and that's the only reason, I suggest unfollowing me.
I will also be changing my interactions with fans on the BSN to a role that is more moderation focused and less engagement focused. Thanks to those of you who have provided wonderful conversations.
Lastly, despite what someone indicated on an earlier page, I am not a salaried employee. I am paid hourly. It's a good job, but I'm not being paid to engage with the community at 3AM. I did it because I thought it was helpful. I'm sorry that it wasn't.
EDIT: None of this affects my role. I'm still your advocate and am actively collecting feedback, thoughts, questions, concerns etc.
OK guys, I'll leave you to your c̶a̶l̶i̶b̶r̶speculations. I'll be back when Bioware fucks up again (so could be tomorrow!) or when Amir0x finishes the game and finds his way here.
i think mine looks pretty good.
http://i.imgur.com/ZBaIu.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
Why, he looks just like Cortez with hints of Conrad Verner and every other male NPC!
Galactic Readiness was the only thing I seriously paid attention to, and even THAT got overhyped somehow. Can't believe how badly they botched it, should've just skipped putting it in.
Those quotes just make me sad... I'm used to developer overhyping of course, but some of them like this:
"Of course you don’t have to play multiplayer, you can choose to play
all the side-quests in single-player and do all that stuff you’ll
still get all the same endings and same information, it’s just a
totally different way of playing"
alright, thought i would post my input on this whole ending fiasco. i for one, did not have such a big problem with the ending as others did.
i'll start with things i agree should not have happened:
- Joker should not have been leaving the Sol Sytem with the rest of your crew, including your romantic interest. this part definitely sucks.
- Shepard dying. Sucks. There should be a happy ending, where you live happily ever after with your romantic interest.
and i think those are the only two problems. here's why i think everything else is fine.
I believe the Mass Effect world, in its history, is a reflection of human history on a galactic scale. Civilizations rise to a peak, and eventually die out or kill each other off. Same with galactic species. Its a mirror of technology becoming so advanced that it destroys nature, similar to the plot of The Day the Earth Stood Still. The Reapers' job, is to control this inevitable self destruction, so that younger and underdeveloped species can survive the armageddon.
This is where Shepard comes in, why he's the legend. He defies this inevitability, by uniting all the species and making certain choices like curing the genophage. If not for Shepard, war would happen everywhere. Krogan vs Turians and Salarians, Quarians vs Geth. Especially Shep's influence in resolving Quarian vs Geth, organics vs synthetics.
Shepard proves Reapers are wrong method by uniting all the species. Thus he is given option to control or destroy Reapers, and sets back galactic technology. Like the ending of Day the Earth Stood Still, where
electricity was taken out
. Its a bittersweet ending, where the cycle is broken, but technology is set back to allow for a longer lifetime of organics.
The stargazer ending implies that everything eventually worked out, and Shepard's story was passed down.
While I personally thinks that's a cool possibility, even if the indocrination or whatever stuff is true, it still needs an ending once s/he fights off the indoctrination.
Why not have choices? You have your standard bittersweet ending where Shepard dies, and your two extreme endings, one bad ending where the Reapers win and one happy ending where everyone lives. The two extreme endings require you to actively go out of your way to attain, while the bittersweet one can be obtained through a normal playthrough. Thus, you will please everyone.
Why not have choices? You have your standard bittersweet ending where Shepard dies, and your two extreme endings, one bad ending where the Reapers win and one happy ending where everyone lives. The two extreme endings require you to actively go out of your way to attain, while the bittersweet one can be obtained through a normal playthrough. Thus, you will please everyone.
Because pleasing everyone rarely makes a good ending. Lots of the best endings ever arent happy. I dont care about shepard living or a happy ending. I just want an ending that makes fucking sense. Everyone could die horribly and I'd be ok if it was a solid conclusion.
Its not even in any way like the traditional game endings,
where you can say how many endings there are or whether you got
ending A, B, or C.....The endings have a lot more sophistication and
variety in them.
Say they do give an ending DLC, where they change the star child crap...how would that work? Say they decided to cut the star child, well it's already on the disc...would the DLC overwrite that? This is all hypothetical and just a question about DLC in general and less about the actual ending...
Because pleasing everyone rarely makes a good ending. Lots of the best endings ever arent happy. I dont care about shepard living or a happy ending. I just want an ending that makes fucking sense. Everyone could die horribly and I'd be ok if it was a solid conclusion.
Why limit yourself to one canon choice? Why not truly have multiple endings that aren't palette swaps? Why not have endings that are formulated based on what you did during the game and not what "button" you chose to push in the final five minutes of the game?
Say they do give an ending DLC, where they change the star child crap...how would that work? Say they decided to cut the star child, well it's already on the disc...would the DLC overwrite that? This is all hypothetical and just a question about DLC in general and less about the actual ending...
Depends on how DLC hooks into the game. My theory is the game only supports adding new planets and systems, but I'm also pretty sure they can edit dialogues in a way that would allow them to make some fairly major changes to the existing map load order and include new maps.
Worst case scenario they have to patch the game to allow DLC in places they didn't expect, which may or may not work on the console versions.
Depends on how DLC hooks into the game. My theory is the game only supports adding new planets and systems, but I'm also pretty sure they can edit dialogues in a way that would allow them to make some fairly major changes to the existing map load order and include new maps.
Worst case scenario they have to patch the game to allow DLC in places they didn't expect, which may or may not work on the console versions.
It's proven time and time again that renegade options ultimately destroy, kill, or injure someone. This destroys all the Reapers. It makes sense that it's Red, and it makes sense that Anderson is used to depict it, because it's what he would have done.
Paragons typically would use their mind and use it as a way to control the situation, in this case literally controlling the Reapers.
I will say this much. Paragon and Renegade aren't divided by mind vs might or good vs evil or anything like that. Or atleast that's not what the original purpose was. Bioware messed up a lot of times with this, I'll admit, but what Paragon and Renegade were originally designed to be how you handle yourself in regards to whether you are in accordance to the code of conduct with the Alliance military. Your either a paragon of it, or you abandon them and be a Renegade.
Going by the purpose that the paragon/renegade system was originally designed for, it makes very little sense that anderson would be Renegade and Illusive man a Paragon.
You know guys, after playing the game for second time something occurred to me. The Ending wasn't the most what bothered me about Mass Effect 3., you know what it was ? Jessica Chobot !
I am sorry, I know I've already said it in the previous thread it is just I cannot wrap my head around her existence in the game, I mean whats the point ?!
You know guys, after playing the game for second time something occurred to me. The Ending wasn't the most what bothered me about Mass Effect 3., you know what it was ? Jessica Chobot !
I am sorry, I know I've already said it in the previous thread it is just I cannot wrap my head around her existence in the game, I mean whats the point ?!
You know guys, after playing the game for second time something occurred to me. The Ending wasn't the most what bothered me about Mass Effect 3., you know what it was ? Jessica Chobot !
I am sorry, I know I've already said it in the previous thread it is just I cannot wrap my head around her existence in the game, I mean whats the point ?!
Because pleasing everyone rarely makes a good ending. Lots of the best endings ever arent happy. I dont care about shepard living or a happy ending. I just want an ending that makes fucking sense. Everyone could die horribly and I'd be ok if it was a solid conclusion.
heh...I remember when i still didn't finish ME3, keep hearing all this "OMG THE ENDING WAS TERRIBLE!!" rage all over the internet.
At the time, I was guessing that the ending would be The Crucible wipes out every lifeform in the galaxy including reapers. Giving future generations a chance to live.
And the reason for fan uproar was because the crucible storyline was a waste of time. Boy how wrong I was. Now I wish they'd use my ending instead.
Heh that looks similar to mine except mine has thinner lips and blue eyes. Also bigger jaw. And IMO our prototype is better than Sheploo. Sheploo looks so wooden in some scenes for some reason.
You know guys, after playing the game for second time something occurred to me. The Ending wasn't the most what bothered me about Mass Effect 3., you know what it was ? Jessica Chobot !
I am sorry, I know I've already said it in the previous thread it is just I cannot wrap my head around her existence in the game, I mean whats the point ?!
Just so you guys are aware, my Twitter account will no longer be a place to discuss BioWare (at least for now). If you're following me there and that's the only reason, I suggest unfollowing me.
I will also be changing my interactions with fans on the BSN to a role that is more moderation focused and less engagement focused. Thanks to those of you who have provided wonderful conversations.
Lastly, despite what someone indicated on an earlier page, I am not a salaried employee. I am paid hourly. It's a good job, but I'm not being paid to engage with the community at 3AM. I did it because I thought it was helpful. I'm sorry that it wasn't.
EDIT: None of this affects my role. I'm still your advocate and am actively collecting feedback, thoughts, questions, concerns etc.
Damn, I bet it must suck to be a CM and be absolutely blasted by the fans you are in charge of managing, or have your every word dissected as gospel on a twitter feed, especially when you're trying to be a nice, personable figure.
On the other hand, not much community management was being had on any front, at least on the BSN. No debate, no discussion, just "we're listening and clarifying". Just the absolute basic locking duplicate threads or deleting hostile posts. Of course, responding only invites the potential for further discontent.
A Damned if you do, damned if you don't situation if I ever saw one.
Going by the purpose that the paragon/renegade system was originally designed for, it makes very little sense that anderson would be Renegade and Illusive man a Paragon.
I think you're actually still tying the good/bad principles to it: Anderson isn't bad because he follows military protocol, so he can't be red.
Again, the Red option is not inteded to reflect Anderson, but more on Shepard's resolve to destroy everything. The word is very much tied to the renegade.
Imagine the colors were reversed.
What would be gained by a renegade Shep? This isn't Dragon Age where you could become a Blood Mage by consorting with a demon. Nothing would be gained by him or her by controlling the Reapers. He or she would want to remain human, and would want to do whatever it takes to remove the Reapers from the galaxy.
And if the option to destroy were blue, a paragon Shepard would not only be sacrificing him or herself (as in Control) but also the Geth and any other sentient AI in the galaxy or universe. That doesn't sound like a true paragon, because the many outweigh the few. I think a paragon would go the extra length to achieve peace if it meant giving his or her life for it.
For a while only, untile they are ready to be reaped themselves. What is the point of allowing life if you deny it's nature i.e. evolution and the ability to choose (free will).
well, 50 000 years is a long while. and species live longer than that (i.e. humans were around at the end of the last cycle but weren't targeted, so they lived more than 50,000 years till next cycle.)
the point of stopping evolution is that it inevitably leads to destruction. the idea is that if organic life is allowed to go on, then eventually all organic life will die out. Reapers use the cycle to keep organic life going.
Sorry but he doesn't. The only inevitability here is the Starchild, and Shepard doesn't defy him, he accepts him. All of those choices didn't matter for who he was, because none of them factor into what he could do, in fact most of the endings deny them outright.Krogans are either cured in a planet with no resources or destined to die. Quarians are stranded at the other end of the galaxy. In all endings your peace pacts don't factor in, and one of them outright kills the Geth you fought to save.
Shepard's goal is to get rid of the Reapers, something no-one has ever done before, in all the tons and tons of cycles till present. Starchild offers Shepard different options of getting rid of the Reaper threat and saving humanity and the galaxy. There would literally be no other way of saving everyone. Starchild even says to him that his appearance means Reapers are no longer the correct method.
There's nothing bittersweet about it. All of the races are destined to extinction, in fact a pretty violent and rapid one. Their home planets become unsustainable without space travel, and are already kind of devastated/overpopulated. Hell, the Quarians are all stranded above Earth, on the other side of the galaxy.
no, they're not. the civilian fleet of the quarians is still left behind. Reaper attacks significantly reduced population on other planets. and its not like all members of every species came to Earth. they are still on their home world.
Am I the only one that hates the fact that the facial hair doesn't connect with the hair. There's just this awkward gap where some sideburns should be.
Am I the only one that hates the fact that the facial hair doesn't connect with the hair. There's just this awkward gap where some sideburns should be.