Dreams-Visions
Member
You can see the President just reflecting the weariness of many people on the consistent inaction on these serious issues.
I feel him, man.
Shit feels bad.
You can see the President just reflecting the weariness of many people on the consistent inaction on these serious issues.
They've beaten all of the anger out of Obama.
Sigh.
I mean, obviously we ought to wait for the facts. But c'mon. Two people decide to carry out major attacks on gay events within 24 hours and it's unrelated lone gunmen?
Nah, I say drop him into ISIS held territory and let them have him. He is Shiite, so let scum devour scum.
Shiite are scum now?
It's more like the third one in the past year, at a minimum.
So the daesh link is almost confirmed?
Jesus Christ. Can't these fuckers just get a life instead of trying to justify their existence by robbing innocents of theirs?
Does the bible say to kill gays like that Quran verse or just that it's a sin? (Sorry idk)
He's probably thinking in the back of his mind how Trump could be in his position this time next year.You can see the President just reflecting the weariness of many people on the consistent inaction on these serious issues.
What were you expecting?
I mean, obviously we ought to wait for the facts. But c'mon. Two people decide to carry out major attacks on gay events within 24 hours and it's unrelated lone gunmen?
The researchers did a statistical analysis of 176 mass shooting events in the U.S. from 2006 to 2011 and 220 school shootings between 1997 and 2013. They discovered that mass shootings were significantly more likely to occur if another shooting that received national media coverage took place in the previous 13 days
Was the monster that killed all of these people taken alive?
Shiite are scum now?
This is his third(? god I lost count) mass shooting speech he has had to make in the past four years.
Was the monster that killed all of these people taken alive?
I don't know, frankly. Something different.
Guess which point is the easiest to address and solve? Banning a religion, banning a viewpoint, or implementing stricter gun control measures?
No it isn't. He called the police and said something, that isn't a link.
They've beaten all of the anger out of Obama.
Sigh.
Ok thanks. I got a notification from the NYT saying he'd pledged allegiance but couldn't find the source on their site.
So the daesh link is almost confirmed?
Jesus Christ. Can't these fuckers just get a life instead of trying to justify their existence by robbing innocents of theirs?
No not Shiite. He is a Shiite, as in ISIS hate them more than anyone else. He is the scum along with ISIS.
Edit: clarified.Nah, I say drop him into ISIS held territory and let them have him. He is Shiite, so let scum devour scum.
Obama put-up his fight after Sandy Hook, and it went nowhere. He looks tired and disappointed at this point
They've beaten all of the anger out of Obama.
Sigh.
Excuse me while I go throw up.
![]()
No it isn't. He called the police and said something, that isn't a link.
Does the bible say to kill gays like that Quran verse or just that it's a sin? (Sorry idk)
No. I think he trod very carefully to avoid a shitstorm from NRA/Republicans over "politicising the issue".
But my hobby
“He was not a stable person,” said the ex-wife, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because she feared for her safety in the wake of the mass shooting.
“He beat me. He would just come home and start beating me up because the laundry wasn’t finished or something like that.”
...[She added] that he wasn’t very religious and worked out at the gym often. She said in the few months they were married he gave no signs of having fallen under the sway of radical Islam.
I'm pretty sure every mass murder is considered a terrorist incident.
"Terrorist" has a no real definition and tend to be used politically by States to demonize an (ideological) opponent who may or may not be violent. It's so vague that specialists refuse to use it. Always be careful when using that word or when reading it, it doesn't explain everything but it is very useful to simplify things and prevent analysis.
If we use the common definition though, yes, it could be considered as a terrorist act because so far he seemed to have political reasons (hatred of homosexuals having their place in society) that he wanted to "share" by killing more than 50 people, and knowing that it will strike the news. I believe that saying he was with ISIS could be a strategy to get an even broader audience, taking example of what happened in France, Belgium, Netherlands or the US last year. He certainly knew what he was doing.
No. I think he trod very carefully to avoid a shitstorm from NRA/Republicans over "politicising the issue".
What the fuck is this?
Yeah, I'm not even posting in this thread.
.Good for all of you who apparently never had a bad experience with conservative religious people who read their holy texts rigorously and seriously. You probably never had violent arguments or family breakups just for being the way you are and could live peacefully instead.
Please don't assume that this is true for everyone else just because you have a positive anecdote to share.
Very interested in learning more details about the gunman and what exactly he used. I'm seeing some kind of automatic rifle and a pistol.