doncale said:CNN.com
if CNN.com posts that the death toll could top 60,000 then 100,000 is entirely possible.
holy shit this is almost unbelivable. but then, not really, considering the devastating power of nature
The thing is the US and Pacific do have warning systems thus to a limited extent some lives would be able to be saved. The Indian ocean had no warning. CNN is arguing a hypothesis with a real event . Personally I hate shit like that. US stations always trying to relate it back to the US.ManaByte said:100,000 is a huge number, but there are potential disasters that could cause even more deaths. CNN last night (or early this morning) went over some of them to put it into perspective how things could be even worse (even has bad as they are now). If the volcano in Yellowstone goes, it could kill a third of US. If the Canary Islands volcano finishes its slide into the ocean (something that is constantly happening) it would wipe out the entire Eastern seaboard, the Florida keys, and most of the Caribbean.
Fresh Prince said:The thing is the US and Pacific do have warning systems thus to a limited extent some lives would be able to be saved. The Indian ocean had no warning. CNN is arguing a hypothesis with a real event . Personally I hate shit like that. US stations always trying to relate it back to the US.
Same shit happens here 40,000+ estimated dead but (more importantly) 6 Australians died.
ManaByte said:True, but there are some things no warning can prepare you for. Even if they had 30 minutes warning (at best) for the quake that still wouldn't have been enough time to evacuate enough people from the Tsunami areas. The same thing would be true with those two volcanos. Disasters such as this are just so large that a little bit of warning still isn't enough.
3pheMeraLmiX said:I was looking at the map of the canary islands and couldn't imagine how it would "slide" into the ocean. If it did, though -- that would be an incredibly huge 150+ft wave that would obliterate the east Coast. A 3,000 foot dome of water caused by the landslide would be a devistatingly awe inducing sight to see, that is, just before you'd be engulfed by such a horrendous beast.
ManaByte said:100,000 is a huge number, but there are potential disasters that could cause even more deaths. CNN last night (or early this morning) went over some of them to put it into perspective how things could be even worse (even has bad as they are now). If the volcano in Yellowstone goes, it could kill a third of US. If the Canary Islands volcano finishes its slide into the ocean (something that is constantly happening) it would wipe out the entire Eastern seaboard, the Florida keys, and most of the Caribbean.
Suranga3 said:I hope miyuru is Okay. He and his family went to Sri Lanka to visit relatives a week ago for the holiday season.
No, I think that was Kabuki Waq.Lonestar said:Wasn't Miyuru the one that posted pictures of his wedding?
Same.Either way, hope he and his family are alright :/
Wait has he gone back to Sri Lanka? :\Pachinko said:Miyiru is from edmonton has well. Wierd how all this touches home sometimes...
The following article appeared in the Thai daily The Nation under Pravit Rojanaphruks byline Dec. 28 and acquired by a RAW STORY correspondent. The article was referenced in the Washington Post and the Swedish newspaper Expressen.
Minutes after the earthquake hit northern Sumatra at 7:58am on Sunday, officials of the meteorological department, who were at a seminar in Cha-am, convened an emergency meeting chaired by Supharek Tansrit-tanawaong, director general.
They had just learned that the Bangkok office had reported an earthquake measuring 8.1 on the Richter scale, which was much lower than the level officially recorded later.
We didnt think there would be subsequent seismic waves, because a similar quake of 7.6 on the Richter scale, which hit Sumatra on November 2, 2002, did not affect Thailand, said a member of the department who asked not to be named.
Moreover, the quake this time hit west of Sumatra and officials thought the island might offer a natural shelter, preventing any waves from breaking towards Phuket and its vicinity, he said.
With slightly less than one hour before the waves came ashore, Supharek said, the department officials did not expect a tsunami. There are just four people on the departments 900-person staff who were earthquake experts, he said. Also a tsunami had not hit Thailand in more than 300 years.
But sources said they did discuss the likelihood that a tsunami could hit Thailands Andaman Sea coastal towns. This was also played down.
The very important factor in making the decision was that its high [tourist] season and
hotel rooms were nearly 100-per-cent full. If we issued a warning, which would have led to an evacuation, [and if nothing happened], what would happen then? Business would be instantly affected. It would be beyond the Meterological Departments ability to handle. We could go under if [the tsunami] didnt come, said a source who attended the meeting.
Fresh Prince said:Wait has he gone back to Sri Lanka? :\
The very important factor in making the decision was that its high [tourist] season and
hotel rooms were nearly 100-per-cent full. If we issued a warning, which would have led to an evacuation, [and if nothing happened], what would happen then? Business would be instantly affected. It would be beyond the Meterological Departments ability to handle. We could go under if [the tsunami] didnt come, said a source who attended the meeting.
Good to hear.Suranga3 said:Just till jan. 10. He and his family went back there just to visit relatives. I'm pretty sure he's fine though, since they are staying in the inner part of Sri Lanka.
Fresh Prince said:The thing is the US and Pacific do have warning systems thus to a limited extent some lives would be able to be saved. died.
Point taken.Tommie Hu$tle said:Not really. Just a note the Canary islands are on the Atlantic side. I saw a special on the Canary Islands and if worse case scenario happens the ensing Tital Wave would
1. Engulf every thing from New York City to Miami.
2. Would go as far in as half the state of Florida. So that means interior of states like North Carolina, Georiga, South Carolina would be innudated with salt water.
3. We would only have 3 to 4 hours of warning.
The first clue would be like it was in Sumatra when the water receeded back into the sea BUT with the Canary Islands the sea would receede back 2 miles and the ensuing tidal wave would be something like 500 feet. This is not to compare situations but to say that with the canary islands the devistation would be catastropic in the extreme.
Amid the devastation in Malaysia, a 20-day-old baby was found alive on a floating mattress. She was later re-united with her family.
A Hong Kong couple on vacation in Thailand survived the initial rush of water and being sucked out to sea, by clinging to a mattress for six hours.
Forsete said:A husband carries around his dead wife because he's afraid they will dump her in a mass grave, he's carrying her around in a coffin while he's looking for his two lost sons.
The one in China (Tangshan, Hebei) was hushed up by the Communist government. And it's not 3 million -- it's around 300,000.Socreges said:115,000 now - 80,000 in Indonesia
In the Globe & Mail, they had a list of such disasters over the last century. An earthquake killed 3 million in China several decades ago (among others - a few above 500k). So, how come people are calling this the largest natural disaster in recorded history? Are the consequences of an earthquake considered 'unnatural' or something?
thorns said:Can anybody point to pictures/footage of the tsunami? I mean the waves themselves, if anything of such is available.
Socreges said:115,000 now - 80,000 in Indonesia
In the Globe & Mail, they had a list of such disasters over the last century. An earthquake killed 3 million in China several decades ago (among others - a few above 500k). So, how come people are calling this the largest natural disaster in recorded history? Are the consequences of an earthquake considered 'unnatural' or something?
Wait, so both kids survived?MIMIC said:Anybody hear the survivor story about the mother who had to let go of one of her children to save the other?
This child is going to remember that for the rest of his life. "My mom sacrificed my life for my brother."
Dan said:Wait, so both kids survived?
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Mother of two Jillian Searle had to choose between her children when she made a life-or-death decision.
Swept up by mountainous tsunami waves at a Thai resort, she could not hold on to both her young sons and survive.
Fighting to stay above the surging waters, she had to choose which one would have to take his chances in the swirling, debris-strewn torrent.
"I knew I had to let go of one of them and I just thought I'd better let go of the one that's the oldest," Searle, from the Western Australian city of Perth, told Sky News television in a report broadcast on Thursday.
Searle said she was near the hotel pool on the southern Thai resort island of Phuket with her sons Lachie, 5, and two-year-old Blake when the waves struck.
"A lady grabbed hold of him for a moment but she had to let him go because she was going under," she said referring to Lachie.
"And I was screaming, trying to find him, and we thought he was dead," she told reporters on arrival back in Australia.
Lachie was found alive about two hours later clinging to a door and, though traumatised by his ordeal, looked uninjured as his mother spoke to reporters.
She was accompanied by the two boys and their father, Brad, who had watched the drama helplessly from their first-floor hotel room.