• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

May 7th | UK General Election 2015 OT - Please go vote!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Spookie

Member
Second general election in a row in which one of the officials at my polling station was wearing a Conservative rosette. Alright, it was plain blue and didn't say "Conservative" on it but it's hardly likely they're pulling for the Greens, is it? Say if that made me genuinely uncomfortable - which it did - who would I report such a thing to?

Were they outside? Or inside? I think anything past the gates is ok but would be frowned upon.
 

phisheep

NeoGAF's Chief Barrister
Second general election in a row in which one of the officials at my polling station was wearing a Conservative rosette. Alright, it was plain blue and didn't say "Conservative" on it but it's hardly likely they're pulling for the Greens, is it? Say if that made me genuinely uncomfortable - which it did - who would I report such a thing to?

Are you sure it was an official and not a party teller?
 

Par Score

Member
Ashcroft National:
CON 33 (+1)
LAB 33 (+3)
LIB 10 (-1)
UKIP 11 (-1)
GRN 6 (-1)
Dates 5th-6th
N=3,028

Pretty nervy times for the pollsters, they've all basically converged around the 34% for both parties. At least in 2010 you had a real spread of polling so one of them was bound to be right. As it is you've essentially got the pack on 34% with a couple at 35% and a couple at 33%. If they're wrong they're all wrong.

Safety in numbers!

This late swing to Labour from the phone pollsters must have the Tories shitting it, one of their last grasps was "The phone polls are right, online is wrong", but now they all show the same thing.

Second general election in a row in which one of the officials at my polling station was wearing a Conservative rosette. Alright, it was plain blue and didn't say "Conservative" on it but it's hardly likely they're pulling for the Greens, is it? Say if that made me genuinely uncomfortable - which it did - who would I report such a thing to?

Parties are allowed to have representatives at polling stations and counts, indeed it is encouraged to make sure everyone is happy, and everything is considered free and fair.

I'm not totally up on the rules about exactly where they can be, nor what kind of campaigning they can do (vis-a-vis that blank blue rosette), but as long as they weren't barging into polling booths shouting "Vote Tory you bloody oiks!" it's probably nothing you can pursue.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
92% Tory
85% Lib
75% Lab

Seems like I can vote for everyone xD . I have an exam today though and travel is long...hopefully I'll make it back in time to place a vote.

As long as you're in the queue by 10pm, you can still vote. If you're still unsure between candidates at this stage and haven't quickly checked your constituency, you can search for it here: https://yougov.co.uk/#/centre and see which parties are competitive in your seat, e.g. it's probably not best to vote Liberal in a Labour/Conservative marginal. Another last minute decision helper can be using http://www.theyworkforyou.com/ to see if you agree with your local MP; often they can differ quite considerably from the party line.
 
Here's the other survey that will tell you which parties policies you supposedly support most. Gives you a great breakdown at the end.

https://uk.isidewith.com



This was neat. I'm in the US so I couldn't answer a handful of questions due to ignorance on the topics, but of what I was able to answer it said that I side pretty strongly with both labour and liberal democrats. Not sure if they're insanely different parties that I happened to match with due to skipping a handful of crucial questions, but it was interesting nonetheless to see how I'd vote in another country.
 
The Daily Mash said:
Tactical voters hopelessly confused
21-11-14

TACTICAL voters no longer have any idea who they are meant to be voting for or who they are trying to keep out, they have admitted.

There's no point trying to be clever about this

There’s no point trying to be clever about this

The rise of UKIP, the fall of the Lib Dems and the frantic oscillation of Labour and the Conservatives have made tactical voting more complicated than quantum physics.

Joseph Turner of Leeds said: “In 1997 I voted Labour to get the Tories out, in 2005 I voted Lib Dem to get Labour out, and four years ago I voted Tory to get the Tories out, which seemed to make sense at the time.

“Now I’m told that if I vote UKIP I’ll wake up in bed with Ed Miliband, if I vote Labour I’ll wake up in bed with Nigel Farage, and if I vote Lib Dem that Nick Clegg will move all his stuff in and put his name on the mortgage.

“Do they just mean in bed, or will I actually have to do it with them? And is there any way I can stop it?”

Political blogger Susan Traherne said: “UKIP’s growing power, the Greens overtaking the Lib Dems and the willingness of every party to go into coalition with every other means tactical voting is over.

“Voters are now advised simply to cast their vote for the party they would most like to see actually running the county.

“Which admittedly doesn’t make the choice any easier.”

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/polit...ical-voters-hopelessly-confused-2014112192994
 

CCS

Banned
tweet-596237250461102080-2.jpg


Absolutely sensational advice.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
This was neat. I'm in the US so I couldn't answer a handful of questions due to ignorance on the topics, but of what I was able to answer it said that I side pretty strongly with both labour and liberal democrats. Not sure if they're insanely different parties that I happened to match with due to skipping a handful of crucial questions, but it was interesting nonetheless to see how I'd vote in another country.

Liberal Democrats are roughly equivalent to the more pro-business Democrats in the U.S., though not the socially illiberal ones. I think Obama would probably be a Liberal Democrat were he in the UK, potentially even Conservative. Labour is the further left of the Democrats, but has a wider range I don't think the US Democrats encompass, US politics is centred further to the right.
 

Mr. Sam

Member
Were they outside? Or inside? I think anything past the gates is ok but would be frowned upon.

Are you sure it was an official and not a party teller?

He was inside the building and collecting people's polling cards, so I assume he was there in an official capacity and not, beyond the rosette, affiliated with a party. I didn't take my polling card so all he got from me was a look of bemusement.
 

Mr Git

Member
Voted early this morning. Someone give me a sticker or a star or a cookie or something.

Second general election in a row in which one of the officials at my polling station was wearing a Conservative rosette. Alright, it was plain blue and didn't say "Conservative" on it but it's hardly likely they're pulling for the Greens, is it? Say if that made me genuinely uncomfortable - which it did - who would I report such a thing to?

Whoa what? That's really not allowed. Even voters aren't meant to wear rosettes or anything relating to the parties in case it intimidates other voters. You should complain very loudly.
 

mclem

Member
http://www.buzzfeed.com/tomphillips/tactical-voting?bftw&utm_term=4ldqpgm#.vn5AGDXXN

I'm sure someone posted this beforehand, but an interesting guide to if you should tacitly vote in your constituency by Buzzfeed.

Hmmm. It's broadly correct in how it reads my constituency, but...

So, your seat is currently held by Labour – and in this election, we think it'll probably be marginal.

It has been marginal in the past - at the height of Labour's unpopularity; I'll be *very* surprised if it's close to marginal this time.
 

kmag

Member
Liberal Democrats are roughly equivalent to the more pro-business Democrats in the U.S., though not the socially illiberal ones. I think Obama would probably be a Liberal Democrat were he in the UK, potentially even Conservative. Labour is the further left of the Democrats, but has a wider range I don't think the US Democrats encompass, US politics is centred further to the right.

Labour also has a statist centralisation tendency which doesn't really map to any of the political parties in the US.
 
Liberal Democrats are roughly equivalent to the more pro-business Democrats in the U.S., though not the socially illiberal ones. I think Obama would probably be a Liberal Democrat were he in the UK, potentially even Conservative. Labour is the further left of the Democrats, but has a wider range I don't think the US Democrats encompass, US politics is centred further to the right.

I'm pretty far left by US standards, so Labour sounds like the party for me. Someone in UK GAF cast a vote for me :D
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
Getting a similar result for my constituency. It was a marginal a decade ago, and a three-way one at that, but if it's marginal at this election Labour are in for a shock wipe-out.
 

phisheep

NeoGAF's Chief Barrister
He was inside the building and collecting people's polling cards, so I assume he was there in an official capacity and not, beyond the rosette, affiliated with a party. I didn't take my polling card so all he got from me was a look of bemusement.

Sounds like a party teller to me. Perfectly legal. They're not supposed to be inside the polling station - but the polling station isn't necessarily the whole building, it's usually just one room.
 

Atrophis

Member
Today's plan. Work, vote, traditional election night visit to the chippy, marathon Ballot Monkeys until the election coverage starts.
 
If she's not voted yet and that's important to her, you should show her. I could never vote for an MP with such a poor stance.

It's too late, we voted this morning. She's Labour through and through. I wish we had sat down and looked at TheyWorkForYou together though. Some of the votes seem so 'unlabour-like', and really unlike what I think my wife would support. She is a strong supporter of Gay Rights, so I really think she'd find this surprising.

 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
I'm pretty far left by US standards, so Labour sounds like the party for me. Someone in UK GAF cast a vote for me :D

Bear in mind that Labour does encompass a pretty wide range of social views though, to the point that some people prefer the Liberal Democrats simply because Labour is pro-surveillance state and so on. I think the States there's a very strong trend between being further left economically and being more socially liberal, at least at a political level where, for example, Bernie Saunders is very liberal politically, but that doesn't hold true in the UK.
 
The polls may well be right re: voteshare but how that translates into seats in the marginals is the interesting thing!

Yep, the polls probably aren't going to be more than one or two percentage points off, since they all pretty much agree.

But that one or two percentage points could make a big difference. Whether it's a 3% or 5% swing from Con -> Lab could be the difference of around 20 marginal seats, looking at this table:

 
Labour also has a statist centralisation tendency which doesn't really map to any of the political parties in the US.


A Google search for "statist centralisation" has failed me. Care to elaborate because the US, indeed, doesn't focus on such a thing. Or if we do, it's under a different title.
 

Spookie

Member
He was inside the building and collecting people's polling cards, so I assume he was there in an official capacity and not, beyond the rosette, affiliated with a party. I didn't take my polling card so all he got from me was a look of bemusement.

I was working last year with a friend on his local campaign and was told they needed help down the polling station. When I got there I was told to remove ANYTHING identifying any party allegiance. So by the sounds of it he has dun fucked up.
 

Mindwipe

Member
A Google search for "statist centralisation" has failed me. Care to elaborate because the US, indeed, doesn't focus on such a thing. Or if we do, it's under a different title.

The US equivalent would be a tendency for federal power over state power. But to an extent that would be unimaginable in the US.
 

Porcile

Member
Voted for Labour. I don't think there's much between the Cam and Ed but I'm sick of the Conservatives sanctimonious and mumsy predication.
 

MrChom

Member
It's too late, we voted this morning. She's Labour through and through. I wish we had sat down and looked at TheyWorkForYou together though. Some of the votes seem so 'unlabour-like', and really unlike what I think my wife would support. She is a strong supporter of Gay Rights, so I really think she'd find this surprising.

This MP looks like a very blue-tinged Labour.....more Blairite than proper Labour, even.

Very odd voting record, all around, really.
 
Bear in mind that Labour does encompass a pretty wide range of social views though, to the point that some people prefer the Liberal Democrats simply because Labour is pro-surveillance state and so on. I think the States there's a very strong trend between being further left economically and being more socially liberal, at least at a political level where, for example, Bernie Saunders is very liberal politically, but that doesn't hold true in the UK.

Sounds like you guys have a healthy array of actual choices when voting. Must be nice :'(

And yes, in the US republicans are both socially conservative and fiscally conservative while democrats are both fiscally left and socially liberal. There's really not much deviance from those viewpoints within the two parties, although you could argue that moderate democrats trend toward fiscal conservatism in some regards while holding socially liberal views.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
I think it's more complicated than that because Labour has historically been the party of devolution, but it'd be safe to say they favour a few concentrated sources of government capability rather than a decentralized system.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
Sounds like you guys have a healthy array of actual choices when voting. Must be nice :'(

And yes, in the US republicans are both socially conservative and fiscally conservative while democrats are both fiscally left and socially liberal. There's really not much deviance from those viewpoints within the two parties, although you could argue that moderate democrats trend toward fiscal conservatism in some regards while holding socially liberal views.

I'm not necessarily sure we do have more choice, at least not historically. If you jump back in time a decade, you could very roughly map all three of our major parties onto different wings of the Democratic party in the US; our politics would have looked like an internal Democratic party debate in terms of the type and subject of conversations with maybe a touch of the most centrist Republicans. As such, you could say we had less choice then, or even if we had a choice between three as opposed to two, your two were further apart so the range of choice available to us was certainly smaller.

What's happening at this election is very much uncharted waters for the UK, a lot of previously irrelevant parties suddenly breaking new ground given the general discontent with the system, Ed Miliband's Labour Party is the furthest to the left it has been in a long time, and there's a fierce war prevailing in our rightwing between the old Conservatives and the new UKIP. It has no real historical comparison in the post-war period.
 

Dougald

Member
Done. For once a teller didn't try and half-block my way into the polling station round here, maybe they know I always kick up a fuss. I do hate how they phrase asking for your card as though they are somehow entitled to look. Always tell them to jog on.
 
This MP looks like a very blue-tinged Labour.....more Blairite than proper Labour, even.

Very odd voting record, all around, really.

It's all very confusing, but it's shown me I need to take a greater interest in what's going on rather than just voting Red, Blue, Yellow, etc.
 
I'm not necessarily sure we do have more choice, at least not historically. If you jump back in time a decade, you could very roughly map all three of our major parties onto different wings of the Democratic party in the US; our politics would have looked like an internal Democratic party debate in terms of the type and subject of conversations with maybe a touch of the most centrist Republicans. As such, you could say we had less choice then, or even if we had a choice between three as opposed to two, your two were further apart so the range of choice available to us was certainly smaller.

What's happening at this election is very much uncharted waters for the UK, a lot of previously irrelevant parties suddenly breaking new ground given the general discontent with the system, Ed Miliband's Labour Party is the furthest to the left it has been in a long time, and there's a fierce war prevailing in our rightwing between the old Conservatives and the new UKIP. It has no real historical comparison in the post-war period.

That's all pretty fascinating. I'm going to read up on the specifics of this election when I wake up. Thanks for humoring my naiveté.

Edit- actually sounds pretty similar to US currently with republicans harshly split between classic conservatism and tea party loonies while the democratic party is less obviously divided between the moderate Hillary Clinton-esque politicians and more populist folks like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders.
 

tomtom94

Member
Hadn't realised just how close Norwich North was (4.6%). I expect Chloe Smith to hang on on the grounds that she's a much better local campaigner and people vote with the incumbent, but it should be a heck of a lot closer.
 
Done. For once a teller didn't try and half-block my way into the polling station round here, maybe they know I always kick up a fuss. I do hate how they phrase asking for your card as though they are somehow entitled to look. Always tell them to jog on.

I don't take it, simply because it says right on the card that you don't have to take it. Also a good excuse to breeze past any party tellers and say you don't know your polling number.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom