• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

McConnell and GOP Senators desperately working on a new "Skinny Repeal" for the ACA

Isn't eliminating the larger risk pool (made of healthy people who can choose not to have health insurance) the only thing this accomplishes? So...all costs go up?

I don't think they understand how insurance works for people who aren't rich or have government provided insurance like they do
 

Kthulhu

Member
If it wasn't for the possibility that this might get though, it would be hilarious that they're this desperate.
 

Sean C

Member
So their legislative strategy to overcome the inability to pass a bill through the Senate is to pass a nothing bill and then go to conference committee to take another stab at passing a bill through the Senate?
 
perhaps one that eliminates the law’s hated individual mandate to buy insurance and little else.

So they're going to kill one of the few cost control measures the ACA has and alter nothing else? Yeah, uh, good luck with that.
 

sangreal

Member
clearly they learned nothing from the House's "just pass something and hope the other chamber fixes it" plan

I guess this is part of a larger strategy to break the ACA and then hope Democrats will be forced to the table
 

KingV

Member
CBO says repealing the individual mandate will reduce the deficit $416 billion from 2018-2026

Huh, I just read their analysis. I have a hard time thinking that it comes out to those numbers but they seem to think that enough people will opt out of insurance to actually save money. Isn't the penalty only a couple of hundred bucks?
 
Huh, I just read their analysis. I have a hard time thinking that it comes out to those numbers but they seem to think that enough people will opt out of insurance to actually save money. Isn't the penalty only a couple of hundred bucks?

A couple hundred bucks is a LOT for a good chunk of the population.
 

sangreal

Member
Huh, I just read their analysis. I have a hard time thinking that it comes out to those numbers but they seem to think that enough people will opt out of insurance to actually save money. Isn't the penalty only a couple of hundred bucks?

the max is like 2 grand or the cost of a bronze plan for a year
 

Ponn

Banned
They only really had a couple options. Trump was actually right when he said if they didn't anything him and the Republicans wouldn't own Obamacare. They would have got away with it because regular voters have the memory of goldfish and think ACA and Obamacare are two different things. Trump can't live with that though, he has an out of control ego and a hard on for hating Obama and undoing everything he does regardless of who it hurts including himself and the GOP. And apparently the GOP are in the end spineless and think they are impervious to losing seats in midterms and the next election over screwing over healthcare. I don't know, maybe they are right about that, i'm just not surprised by anything anymore. Either way people were going to be screwed on healthcare so I would concentrate on the positive that once the GOP does this they own this shit. They do this and the dems need to make it priority one to drive home the message in everyones brain that this is the GOP's shit sandwich that they own full stop.
 
Only some republicans backed the mandate. Remember that even Obama in 2008 was against the mandate, it's not exactly a slam dunk to force people to buy something.

Bob Dole, Orrin Hatch, Chuck Grassley, John Chafee, and others. It was like a "Who's Who" of the GOP that supported the individual mandate in 1993. It's also a list that includes still-sitting Senators like Hatch and Grassley that changed their mind and now want to repeal the ACA's individual mandate.

For a party that's seemingly all about people taking personal responsibility, it's absurd that the GOP has focused on the individual mandate as one of the biggest "problems" with the ACA.
 
Bob Dole, Orrin Hatch, Chuck Grassley, John Chafee, and others. It was like a "Who's Who" of the GOP that supported the individual mandate in 1993. It's also a list that includes still-sitting Senators like Hatch and Grassley that changed their mind and now want to repeal the ACA's individual mandate.

For a party that's seemingly all about people taking personal responsibility, it's absurd that the GOP has focused on the individual mandate as one of the biggest "problems" with the ACA.
Yep, the base hates the mandate. They're politicians and they respond to the will of their voters. Even democrats have been swayed by arguments against the mandate in the past; Obama successfully used it against Hillary during the 2008 primaries.

As far as personal responsibility goes, it seems more in line with that ethic to say people should have the choice to buy or not buy insurance and be personally responsible for the results.

(I'm totally fine with the mandate btw, just wanted to point out the popularity issues and that it was never an "all republicans" thing)
 

mnannola

Member
So the strategy is basically:

1. Repeal the mandate
2. Blame democrats when premiums go up

Let's see how that works out for them.
 

RDreamer

Member
It'd be hilariously stupid to repeal the mandate. Everything says repealing that really would put the insurance market into a sort of death spiral. Except if they repeal it and make headlines they can't say Obamacare is dying. They own it at that point. They want their cake and to eat it to. They want to claim a victory but claim no fault when that victory goes nuts and fucks everyone? Good luck with that messaging.
 
@byrdinator

Corker, asked about the Senate health care bill (with just over an hour to go), says, "I don't know what the deal is." Same, senator. Same.
 

xclk07

Member
538 has a nice run-down of what is actually happening and they are live-blogging it. This is very helpful, because I have no idea about Senate procedures and there's a LOT of crap that is going on before the motion-to-proceed is voted upon. Note, that's simply a motion to VOTE on whatever the "final" bill is... which no-one knows. So even if some of the holdouts vote "yes" on a motion-to-proceed, that doesn't necessarily mean they would vote "yes" on the final bill.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/senate-vote-health-care/
 

sangreal

Member
So the strategy is basically:

1. Repeal the mandate
2. Blame democrats when premiums go up

Let's see how that works out for them.

It'd be hilariously stupid to repeal the mandate. Everything says repealing that really would put the insurance market into a sort of death spiral. Except if they repeal it and make headlines they can't say Obamacare is dying. They own it at that point. They want their cake and to eat it to. They want to claim a victory but claim no fault when that victory goes nuts and fucks everyone? Good luck with that messaging.

They aren't planning to just repeal the mandate -- they are planning to only vote on repealing the mandate so that they can say they passed something and then go back to working in secret to come up with a new bill in conference. That new bill won't be subject to any amendments etc. when the conference concludes
 

platakul

Banned
So the strategy is basically:

1. Repeal the mandate
2. Blame democrats when premiums go up

Let's see how that works out for them.
Their opponents are a group of losers who had to change their brand new slogan in the 48 hours between tweeting it and properly unveiling it 😂
 
Yep, the base hates the mandate. They're politicians and they respond to the will of their voters. Even democrats have been swayed by arguments against the mandate in the past; Obama successfully used it against Hillary during the 2008 primaries.

As far as personal responsibility goes, it seems more in line with that ethic to say people should have the choice to buy or not buy insurance and be personally responsible for the results.

(I'm totally fine with the mandate btw, just wanted to point out the popularity issues and that it was never an "all republicans" thing)

The base only hates the mandate because they were told to hate the mandate by the GOP, not the other way around. Had the GOP been in favor of it, their base would have been too.

The problem with your personal responsibility interpretation is that it ignores the fact that society bears a burden when individuals are not covered by health insurance. Hospitals don't deny emergency patients because they have no health insurance, they just can't collect, and those costs are passed on to everyone else.
 
Its time to Admit

Obama wasnt the devil

He made a good step forward with the ACA and it should be fixed and expanded


Take responsibility for your shitty regressive ideas no one likes
 
If Obama was against the mandate maybe he could just put out a tweet or something that says he supports this legislation. Then they'd have to abort.
 

RevoDS

Junior Member
How can they pass this through reconciliation if it increases costs (and therefore deficits, since no revenue will come from it)?
 

Xe4

Banned
It sounds like they just want to kill Obamacare at all costs. They don't even care about healthcare reform, they just don't want the ACA to last and be popular and lead to more reforms. There's literally no other reason to kill the mandate alone.
 
Not surprised, my brother inlaw will be happy with this since he refuses to pay for insurance to pocket more money and is very vocal how he hates the fine he pays due to the mandate.

I'm very sorry to say this but I hope your brother-in-law develops a debilitating illness and learns a thing or two.
 

JettDash

Junior Member
How can they pass this through reconciliation if it increases costs (and therefore deficits, since no revenue will come from it)?

It will decrease the deficit because fewer people will choose to get Medicaid and subsidized individual plans, according to the CBO.
 

slit

Member
Mitch is light years beyond desperate at this point. That's not going to pass either, the few remaining sane GOP senators know that will destroy the market.
 

Steejee

Member
Mitch is light years beyond desperate at this point. That's not going to pass either, the few remaining sane GOP senators know that will destroy the market.

I don't think I can recall ever seeing this sort of bizarre desperation in a senate leader.
 

StoOgE

First tragedy, then farce.
Who's a hard NO at this point?

Collins.

You can expect a handful of others (Paul, etc) to maybe not think this is a hard enough repeal to potentially be No's, and then the swing staters who are worried about being attacked for knocking 500K Ohioans off health insurance.

Ultimately, I think this bill probably still has a tough road to ho. It depends if the arm-twisting about needing to pass something works.
 
Collins.

You can expect a handful of others (Paul, etc) to maybe not think this is a hard enough repeal to potentially be No's, and then the swing staters who are worried about being attacked for knocking 500K Ohioans off health insurance.

Ultimately, I think this bill probably still has a tough road to ho. It depends if the arm-twisting about needing to pass something works.

It really just depends on what is voted on. A repeal only bill is a solid fail all around imo. And the original replacement is also almost guaranteed to be a fail since Collins, and Paul are extreme hard no's, with the W.V. senator and others that said they would already vote no.
 
So they're finally dropping the charade that this is about people's health care not being good enough? People better wake the fuck up if this happens.
 
Looks like they probably have the votes to move forward with this plan. Portman and Heller are both "yes" on mtp.

Actually getting the votes to pass something will be challenging, however.
 

Steel

Banned
Looks like they probably have the votes to move forward with this plan. Portman and Heller are both "yes" on mtp.

Actually getting the votes to pass something will be challenging, however.

If they have Heller this is gonna proceed. Though, as you say, an actual plan will probably go down like usual.
 

aeolist

Banned
So they're finally dropping the charade that this is about people's health care not being good enough? People better wake the fuck up if this happens.

people have already woken the fuck up, everything the republicans have been doing for the last few months has been massively unpopular with the general public.

the reason they're doing it anyway is because they do not give a single fuck about the general public's opinion, all they care about is pleasing a few small groups (the ultra rich and the craziest tea partiers mainly). these are the people who got them elected, these are the ones who could get them successfully primaried, and nobody else matters. there never was a real charade, only the thinnest of pretenses so everyone can pretend they're following a sane ideology.

it's people like you who need to wake up to the fact that we don't really live in a democracy. the republicans were elected by a minority of the populace and only listen to an even smaller minority in that bloc. oligarchs are running things and they're getting exactly what they want out of this.
 
Top Bottom