Eteric Rice
Member
I'm probably going to buy King Story, Fragile, and maybe ToS: RoK depending on what people think of it.
Other than that, not much.
Other than that, not much.
HK-47 said:No duh, I'm talking current numbers
Lobster said:Well then current numbers is actually 678k
Eteric Rice said:I'm probably going to buy King Story, Fragile, and maybe ToS: RoK depending on what people think of it.
Other than that, not much.
WinFonda said:And many Japanese publishers have indicated they'd rather compete in the much larger Western markets against Western publishers than try to crack Nintendo's stranglehold on Japan.
HK-47 said:DoA4 also did well I believe
Innotech said:I didnt go there, third party publishers went there.
Go yell at them or something.
Maybe they will wake up.
ethelred said:It's not that third parties make worse games than Nintendo. It's that the truly hardcore Nintendo fans are braindead cultists.
beef3483 said:And what are the big Japanese published Western successes? I can think of only two million selling games, released by Capcom, and even those games "supposed" success pales in comparison to games like Gears, Halo, and COD4. Seriously, go look up the million selling games for 360. Nearly all of them are Western Published.
Right now, in the west, 360 and Wii are neck and neck for the largest installed base, with PS3 being just an afterthought. And if you go with 360 or PS3, you have to compete with Western publishers which, if you ask me, is even more daunting than competing with Nintendo.
I didn't realize all those soccer moms and old people were "truly hardcore Nintendo fans"ethelred said:It's not that third parties make worse games than Nintendo. It's that the truly hardcore Nintendo fans are braindead cultists.
Well, the only alternative to giving my opinion is lying and giving an opinion that actually isn't mine, which would be sort of pointless. Or just not posting, but that defeats the purpose of a discussion forum. I'm kind of fond of the idea of people talking openly about their likes and dislikes, especially with a fairly high-profile site like this that people working in the game industry openly visit.HK-47 said:So? That does mean you need to constantly dump on home console gaming or 3-D gaming...I dont know if its an act or not but every time you post it seems like it.
ethelred said:It's not that third parties make worse games than Nintendo. It's that the truly hardcore Nintendo fans are braindead cultists.
Eteric Rice said:Not really, it's just that Nintendo titles don't have such a high rate of suckage.
But only GT5 was published by Sony. I think Sony did all they can to give Musou a boost (price cut, new model, shockaxis, bundle). What else should they have done? With the current userbase don't expect games to have insane legs. They will be heavily front-loaded.Lightning said:The fact that the PS3 has had Musou 5, WE08, GT5P in the past 2mths and not one of them in the top 30 in a big week like this SUCKS ASS. Fuck you Sony, make your damn games sell.
But Nintendo will stay there, even if you don't release games on DS/Wii and go with the competition. In the end it all boils down to wether third parties think they can get more profit from 360/PS3 or Wii. It'll be interesting, no doubt.Agent Icebeezy said:Likewise. I thought it was going to get lost in the shuffle. I'm also happy to be wrong. ike someone said though, look at that sea of 'Nintendo' in the top 30, that is intimidating as fuck.
For hardware to spike, doesn't that require Nintendo to make more?
SE has the best selling current home console gen title in DQ:S. Bandai Namco had some turds but I thought Enichi and One Piece did pretty well. So basically the bigger ones in SE, Capcom and BN.Pureauthor said:Guys, can we get a rundown of all third parties that have seen a significant success on the Wii of any kind in Japan?
I know RE4 and RE:UC, what else?
Jiggy37 said:Well, the only alternative to giving my opinion is lying and giving an opinion that actually isn't mine, which would be sort of pointless. Or just not posting, but that defeats the purpose of a discussion forum. I'm kind of fond of the idea of people talking openly about their likes and dislikes, especially with a fairly high-profile site like this that people working in the game industry openly visit.
But maybe that's beside the point. I don't see how saying that I hope Galaxy doesn't approach NSMB's sales is somehow "dumping" on Galaxy. It's not like I'm calling for the game to stop selling and be a miserable failure and never see another sequel. I said I was rooting for it to not sell as well as NSMB, and that's not even saying much since it could hit 2.5 million LTD and not get close.
Meh, I don't know. I've had trouble replying to your post--it's actually taken me 40 minutes to write this, and it doesn't show at all--just because I really don't understand where you're coming from. Whatever the case, I'm pretty sure I'm not trying to attack anything, but only state my preferences. >_>
Epiphyte said:I didn't realize all those soccer moms and old people were "truly hardcore Nintendo fans"
ethelred said:Frankly, you scare me. You're exactly the sort of person that I can see shooting a U.S. congressman at a Guyanese airport.
Really? I'v played and owned my fair share of third party titles on Wii. While I really liked some of the offerings they don't come close to stuff like SMG and MP3. If I would spend less on videogames I would get those games before any stuff that's currently on the Wii by third parties.ethelred said:It's not that third parties make worse games than Nintendo. It's that the truly hardcore Nintendo fans are braindead cultists.
I never thought I'd live to see a Jonestown reference on GAFethelred said:Frankly, you scare me. You're exactly the sort of person that I can see shooting a U.S. congressman at a Guyanese airport.
Phife Dawg said:Really? I'v played and owned my fair share of third party titles on Wii. While I really liked some of the offerings they don't come close to stuff like SMG and MP3. If I would spend less on videogames I would get those games before any stuff that's currently on the Wii by third parties.
Bear in mind that I haven't played Z&W due to it not being released here in PAL land - I have high hopes for that.
Phife Dawg said:Really? I'v played and owned my fair share of third party titles on Wii. While I really liked some of the offerings they don't come close to stuff like SMG and MP3. If I would spend less on videogames I would get those games before any stuff that's currently on the Wii by third parties.
Bear in mind that I haven't played Z&W due to it not being released here in PAL land - I have high hopes for that.
HK-47 said:Dont worry, its like getting angry at the hardcore PS3 fans cause Uncharted isnt selling....they arent the ones not buying shit
Stop It said:So....Wii Fit is now officially a game then now it has hit a million? or does it become a non-non-game?
It's officially now the game to end all games.Stop It said:So....Wii Fit is now officially a game then now it has hit a million? or does it become a non-non-game? I dunno how this double negative things works, holy shit at Mario Party DS, Layton chugging away, again, and Mario and Sonic showing legs like nothing I have seen from a 3rd party game for ages, remember when we were saying "15k first day :lol Sega".......crow we be eating.
Oh, I see where you're coming from.HK-47 said:I just dont see how someone can root against good games, though I realize pretty much everyone on this forum is guilty of that.
Jiggy37 said:I'm over here rooting for it to never get close to NSMB. I want to see more 2D Mario, Nintendo. Right now. D:
Replace SMG with Mario Party 8, more like.
Jiggy37 said:Oh, I see where you're coming from.
Well, for me it's because too much success can go to the heads of the developers... Even for something like Kirby Ultra Super Deluxe that's a remake of one of my top ten games ever, I don't want it to sell something crazy like 44 million worldwide in case Nintendo saw that and decided it was time to shift 85% of its resources to the Kirby series and make a bunch of spinoffs.
It's already affected stuff like Mario and Final Fantasy, IMO. :/ The Mario sports games could have been totally original creations and made their own name for themselves but they weren't given the chance, and the FF name is plastered on every third games coming out of S-E these days so that stuff like Chocobo Tales and Revenant Wings never could have established its own identity. Because of this, I don't really cheer for a Mario or FF title these days anymore even if it's a port of one of the past games that I loved... I'm worried about a future full of franchise "whoring," as people call it.
Hmm. Thinking about it, I might have to re-evaluate my stance--I'm sounding dangerously close to the people who have been paranoid for a year or more that because Wii Sports/Brain Age/whatever are so successful despite being created with such a low budget, Nintendo would suddenly stop making traditional games that cost so much more to develop. I've never thought that argument made terribly much sense, so I guess I shouldn't be using anything like it myself. >_>
Nah you're fine, you're against spinoffs killing games not "non-games" killing games.Jiggy37 said:Oh, I see where you're coming from.
Well, for me it's because too much success can go to the heads of the developers... Even for something like Kirby Ultra Super Deluxe that's a remake of one of my top ten games ever, I don't want it to sell something crazy like 44 million worldwide in case Nintendo saw that and decided it was time to shift 85% of its resources to the Kirby series and make a bunch of spinoffs.
It's already affected stuff like Mario and Final Fantasy, IMO. :/ The Mario sports games could have been totally original creations and made their own name for themselves but they weren't given the chance, and the FF name is plastered on every third games coming out of S-E these days so that stuff like Chocobo Tales and Revenant Wings never could have established its own identity. Because of this, I don't really cheer for a Mario or FF title these days anymore even if it's a port of one of the past games that I loved... I'm worried about a future full of franchise "whoring," as people call it.
Hmm. Thinking about it, I might have to re-evaluate my stance--I'm sounding dangerously close to the people who have been paranoid for a year or more that because Wii Sports/Brain Age/whatever are so successful despite being created with such a low budget, Nintendo would suddenly stop making traditional games that cost so much more to develop. I've never thought that argument made terribly much sense, so I guess I shouldn't be using anything like it myself. >_>
Man God said:If anything, Nintendo is the last bastion of tradition in gaming, sometimes to the point of folly. For every innovation they've made in controls they've still lagged behind in some way or another, usually to save a buck or to keep some sort of Byzantine control in place like not switching to CDs for the N64.
Look at their games today. Minimal attention to voice acting, some games with very little to no written plot, etc. But they keep plugging away at what they do. It's funny, but it does have a certain charm to it, and I can't really fault them because of their high attention to detail and making sure that above all else, the gameplay is solid and fun throughout.
It does sometimes feel like they're putting up a silent era comedy versus Wizard of Oz and Gone with the Wind, only in this case they still manage to have a competitive product.
Man God said:If anything, Nintendo is the last bastion of tradition in gaming, sometimes to the point of folly. For every innovation they've made in controls they've still lagged behind in some way or another, usually to save a buck or to keep some sort of Byzantine control in place like not switching to CDs for the N64.
Look at their games today. Minimal attention to voice acting, some games with very little to no written plot, etc. But they keep plugging away at what they do. It's funny, but it does have a certain charm to it, and I can't really fault them because of their high attention to detail and making sure that above all else, the gameplay is solid and fun throughout.
It does sometimes feel like they're putting up a silent era comedy versus Wizard of Oz and Gone with the Wind, only in this case they still manage to have a competitive product.
Jiggy37 said:Oh, I see where you're coming from.
Well, for me it's because too much success can go to the heads of the developers... Even for something like Kirby Ultra Super Deluxe that's a remake of one of my top ten games ever, I don't want it to sell something crazy like 44 million worldwide in case Nintendo saw that and decided it was time to shift 85% of its resources to the Kirby series and make a bunch of spinoffs.
It's already affected stuff like Mario and Final Fantasy, IMO. :/ The Mario sports games could have been totally original creations and made their own name for themselves but they weren't given the chance, and the FF name is plastered on every third games coming out of S-E these days so that stuff like Chocobo Tales and Revenant Wings never could have established its own identity. Because of this, I don't really cheer for a Mario or FF title these days anymore even if it's a port of one of the past games that I loved... I'm worried about a future full of franchise "whoring," as people call it.
Hmm. Thinking about it, I might have to re-evaluate my stance--I'm sounding dangerously close to the people who have been paranoid for a year or more that because Wii Sports/Brain Age/whatever are so successful despite being created with such a low budget, Nintendo would suddenly stop making traditional games that cost so much more to develop. I've never thought that argument made terribly much sense, so I guess I shouldn't be using anything like it myself. >_>
That's what makes Nintendo special they take their time with their sequels so you're guaranteed quality when it comes out. The spinoffs are just a tease compared to them. SE is mimicking this now albeit a bit of an overload on one particular franchise.Oblivion said:Nintendo is a strange one. They don't act like how you'd expect a normal company to act. For example, Super Mario World sold 20 million units, but that didn't stop them from taking 15 years to make the next 2D Mario game. Instead of going sequel crazy, Nintendo goes spinoff crazy.
In any case, maybe the developers WANTED to make non-Mario platformer games like Animal Crossing, Brain Training, Nintendogs and whatnot. And if that's what they wanted to make, in the end, that's more important than actually getting what YOU want.
Exactly. There's nothing wrong for wishing a specific direction. Just don't say "game x shouldn't have success" because it looks like an offense to the fans of game x. Make a positive sentence like "game y should sell even better than game x" and only a few would complain.FlightOfHeaven said:Besides, Jiggy, your post was a negative post. "I hope SMG does not do as well as NSMB."
You could have said "Man, I hope NSMB continues to sell well so that Nintendo will put more stock into 2D Marios."
See? Same idea, but with different connotations. In one, you wish for a good game to do, eh, well, but not -too- well. In the second, you ask that a good game get great sales, which there is nothing wrong with.
I don't see how it's the same idea; I think the more positive spin (if it can be called that) on what I said would be something along the lines of "I hope NSMB continues to stay far ahead of SMG."FlightOfHeaven said:Besides, Jiggy, your post was a negative post. "I hope SMG does not do as well as NSMB."
You could have said "Man, I hope NSMB continues to sell well so that Nintendo will put more stock into 2D Marios."
See? Same idea, but with different connotations. In one, you wish for a good game to do, eh, well, but not -too- well. In the second, you ask that a good game get great sales, which there is nothing wrong with.
Maybe it's just late, but I think that's one of the best analogies I've ever heard. Not much else to say in reply since I kind of agree.Man God said:If anything, Nintendo is the last bastion of tradition in gaming, sometimes to the point of folly. For every innovation they've made in controls they've still lagged behind in some way or another, usually to save a buck or to keep some sort of Byzantine control in place like not switching to CDs for the N64.
[...]It does sometimes feel like they're putting up a silent era comedy versus Wizard of Oz and Gone with the Wind, only in this case they still manage to have a competitive product.
A great point, and I wish I'd thought of that earlier tonight. It sets the bar even higher for NSMB, almost as if I have to hope it shifts some 30 million copies before I can safely assume Nintendo will even bother with a sequel. And I'm not even sure it could be assumed then; like you're implying, they're pretty notorious about not doing what gamers want. (Perfect examples: post-1997 Star Fox; no new Metroid between 1994 and 2002; no fully original 2D Metroid post-2002.)Oblivion said:Nintendo is a strange one. They don't act like how you'd expect a normal company to act. For example, Super Mario World sold 20 million units, but that didn't stop them from taking 15 years to make the next 2D Mario game. Instead of going sequel crazy, Nintendo goes spinoff crazy.
I'll concede that it's more important to them, but that's about it.In any case, maybe the developers WANTED to make non-Mario platformer games like Animal Crossing, Brain Training, Nintendogs and whatnot. And if that's what they wanted to make, in the end, that's more important than actually getting what YOU want.
I admit I'm a bit of a linguistic literalist, but I really don't see the difference between "I hope NSMB continues selling better than Galaxy," which is what you're proposing, and "I hope Galaxy never approaches NSMB," which is what I actually said (and is nothing at all like "I hope Galaxy doesn't have success").Neo C. said:Exactly. There's nothing wrong for wishing a specific direction. Just don't say "game x shouldn't have success" because it looks like an offense to the fans of game x. Make a positive sentence like "game y should sell even better than game x" and only a few would complain.
Avrum said:
Phife Dawg said:What is BBA doing there? :lol Is this budget priced as in Europe or full price as in the US?
Nash said:When Smash Bros. hits, things are going to go crazy.
(I mean, even crazier than they are already)
mclem said:I dunno. On one hand, it's a fighting game, and they're inherently generally one of the most hardcore genres around. On another, though, it's by far one of the most accessible fighters for the casual market (and beyond; I'm a fairly obsessive gamer, but I'm not much of a fighter player - yet I at least feel faintly competent in SSB). On a third hand (uh?), Nintendo need to make sure that they impart that latter point to the consumer. On a fourth hand, maybe they don't - it's visually in 2D, which might just give people that NSMB vibe.
So could go either way.
But there was a successor to one game of the Mario series which was totally 2D - Yoshi's Island DS, so you might count it as two [on top of this, there were new levels made for the Yoshi's Island Remake which should be held against the Super Mario 64 remake and on GBA Wario was Mario's representative, remember Super Mario Land 3]. Also, NSMB and Super Mario Galaxy were developed by totally different teams so I doubt they really compete for developer's ressources.Jiggy37 said:I don't see how it's the same idea; I think the more positive spin (if it can be called that) on what I said would be something along the lines of "I hope NSMB continues to stay far ahead of SMG."
Just hoping that NSMB sells spectacularly and shows longevity in its own vacuum isn't necessarily enough to force Nintendo's hand on an NSMB2, because I think Galaxy and NSMB are in direct competition for first-party resources that are dedicated to Mario platformers. Maybe the debate really centers around whether that's true? I'm not sure.
Whatever the case, seeing as there have been three 3D Mario games in the past twelve years and only one 2D Mario, I think there's much more riding on the sales of NSMB than on the sales of Galaxy.
mclem said:I dunno. On one hand, it's a fighting game, and they're inherently generally one of the most hardcore genres around. On another, though, it's by far one of the most accessible fighters for the casual market (and beyond; I'm a fairly obsessive gamer, but I'm not much of a fighter player - yet I at least feel faintly competent in SSB). On a third hand (uh?), Nintendo need to make sure that they impart that latter point to the consumer. On a fourth hand, maybe they don't - it's visually in 2D, which might just give people that NSMB vibe.
So could go either way.
I think possibly a more universal hit will be Mario Kart Wii, since there's no conceptual barriers between that and a game the audience is already massively familiar with and has taken it to their hearts (Mario Kart DS, naturally). I don't see MKWii starting out from the blocks with any of the stigmas that plagued early SMG and could potentially hurt SSB.
jesusraz said:I thought it might have been an error in the listing and should actually be WarioWare: Smooth Moves, which has indeed been floating higher recently. Seeing BBA just magically re-appear like this seems very strange, but More Brain Training shot back up, so perhaps there was a general 'brain' spurt for New Year!
And Gran Turismo is more of a sportscar fetishist's wet dream than a racing game.farnham said:SSB is a character game more then a fighting game...