TheDreadLord
Member
This doesn’t make any sense. Pure bureaucracy and waste of resources.
They don't want competition and want everyone to know how painful it is for them to be asked to click somewhere else to buy a game. It is amusing that they get the most vocal about games they claim to have zero interest in.I don;t get the Fanaticism either, who cares if the game was bought on Steam, EGS, GoG, Origin, Battle Net, uPlay, MS Sotre etc., at the end of the day they land on the exact same drive of your PC, and either way it the exact same double-click the launch them, and who gives a shit which launcher boots up in the background?
After the Vivendi story, everyone should have realised that Ubisoft wants to remain independent. They are out of the race. EA has a strong mainstream portfolio and is the only competitor to Activision-Blizzard besides Ubisoft. Take 2 would easily cost 25 billion in a takeover. I'm not sure Sony or Microsoft want to afford that. Microsoft would not get such a deal through with competition authorities after the last acquisition. On Microsoft's side, smaller studio takeovers are more likely now. It will be some time before Sony responds to the last takeover.EA is such a bad purchase. For that price they could get Ubi, Take 2, Capcom and still have change left over. And those 3 would buy them real leverage over MS with their exclusive Bethesda bullshit and inevitable future attempts to make cod exclusive.
It takes Two was published by EA.
If EA goes to Sony or Microsoft, we are all fucked.
What the hell are you smoking?MS spent $75b buying 2 pc stores. Now Sony spent $3b on bungie, and will buy big publishers in the future.
Valve owns steam, which has big pc market share. It's value is between $4b-$10b.
If anyone of these 2 companies buy valve, we pc community are screwed.
Future now is bleak.
After the Vivendi story, everyone should have realised that Ubisoft wants to remain independent. They are out of the race. EA has a strong mainstream portfolio and is the only competitor to Activision-Blizzard besides Ubisoft. Take 2 would easily cost 25 billion in a takeover. I'm not sure Sony or Microsoft want to afford that. Microsoft would not get such a deal through with competition authorities after the last acquisition. On Microsoft's side, smaller studio takeovers are more likely now. It will be some time before Sony responds to the last takeover.
ahaha poor Bo ..I bet after Ms 75b he's still excited about how Sony is crushing them hahaha
companies as right don't seem interested in Japanese publishers....and from the sound of the rumor it would seem even bigger than Activision Blizzard ...which would exclude Japanese publishers .... or the emphasis on rumor is given by WHO is buying ... like Apple buying Sega even if a small publisher it would upset the gaming worldWho would they buy though? Lots of red tape and laws for Japanese companies to be protected. From Software is the one I would think could be bought by Tenecent, possibly Namco/Bandai since they have ties to some Chinese companies that are holdings for developers like From Software.
and how much would pay Sony to buy EA?
To be honest I was referring to Tomb Raider as the main get from such acquisition. A very well established heroine and a good story game can be very successful.Squares Western branch doesn't even do anything original and they've had a bunch of disappointments and memes ( the Marvel game ), they might as well just be yet more forgettable Western devs as far as I am concerned it wouldn't even change a thing if they were sold.
The Japanse branch tho I don't want to see get sold..
Japan ( and Korea but they're less integrated ) is like the last beacon of not being completely US-centric and centralized in gaming.
Their games are distinctly different and that's a good thing, gaming shouldn't be as stale and samey as it is.
classic defense ? I said they spent x20 times more........answering at that ridiculous "they lost a bidding war against sony" idiocy that hurt my brain just reading itThe classic defence:
Who gives a shit. I don't like online FPS but I'm happy Sony are fixing their problems with this as they will keep wasting money until they get their online success. Hopefully they can then use the money on creating more games I like such as GOW, Horizon, GoT and so on.
I don’t think it shows anything but weakness. MS paid 7bi for 5+ studios plus IPs that are among the biggest in their genre. Sony paid 3.6bi for a single IP company no one talks about.
I also had an emoji of shrugged shoulders after that. Go back and re read, I haven't edited it since. I said if you believe Grubb and Jez, then MS knew of the Sony Bungie deal. Grubb specifically mentions bidding war in his tweet that some here had up.classic defense ? I said they spent x20 times more........answering at that ridiculous "they lost a bidding war against sony" idiocy that hurt my brain just reading it
This doesn’t make any sense. Pure bureaucracy and waste of resources.
I think we are the only 2 people on this forum that love Ubi games Bo. Great minds think alike for sure.Ubisoft will be a killer get! I love Ubisoft games.
RB6 (successful tactical shooter), The Crew (arcade racer), AC (well-established 3rd person action game), Ghost Recon (another IP that could be setup right to its better days), For Honor (successful tactical melee fighting online game), and let's not forget PoP and much more.
Add share information helping Sony's attempts to crack GAAS with their own studios and partners like Deviation and that's everything.Sony bought Bungie for two reasons mainly
- Not to lose the last big FPS maker basically
- That GaaS money
Ubisoft have lots of quality IPs .... it would be worth buying them even just for Splinter Cell ......... or imagine a remake of Driver with more open world things ala GTA ..wowI think we are the only 2 people on this forum that love Ubi games Bo. Great minds think alike for sure.
I'll tell you one thing though, people can hate on Ubisoft all they want but they make good quality games, and whoever buys Ubisoft will be open to some fantastic big named franchises.
I think we are the only 2 people on this forum that love Ubi games Bo. Great minds think alike for sure.
I'll tell you one thing though, people can hate on Ubisoft all they want but they make good quality games, and whoever buys Ubisoft will be open to some fantastic big named franchises.
i think them would be perfect for Sony ....could improve the narrative side of their tpa games (given their experience) and would get along well with the movies division ... Splinter Cell .. or Assassin's Creed.....and above all they are not very expensiveI'm actually surprised at Ubisoft's market cap as it has a revenue as large as 1.59 euros ($1.79B) which is on Zenimax level, but with better quality games and diversity.
i think them would be perfect for Sony ....could improve the narrative side of their tpa games (given their experience) and would get along well with the movies division ... Splinter Cell .. or Assassin's Creed.....and above all they are not very expensive
A free market till it’s not free is the benchmark. A single entity cannot own so much as to stifle the free market for others.But if one company makes enough money, haven't they earned the right to own the market?
That's capitalism, isn't it?
Btw, not saying I endorse monopolies, just curious about the moral context behind free markets, etc.
Yep seen some people say you could probably get Ubisoft around the 10bil mark, compared to what?, 50bil for EA?. I know which company i would rather have.I'm actually surprised at Ubisoft's market cap as it has a revenue as large as 1.59 euros ($1.79B) which is on Zenimax level, but with better quality games and diversity.
Sweet baby jesusI wouldn’t be so sure of that, the rumour is that the Xbox/Activision deal on started talks in November 2021 and was announced by the end of January so you’re probably talking just as much shit as everyone else.
“These deals are months of years in the making” said a non-expert to other non-experts in multi-billion dollar acquisitions.
Man the shock that will hit when their game is revealed as an action RPG and not a COD clone is going to be epic.partners like Deviation and that's everything.
Activision will give MS a lot to work with but seriously what would Sony really gain buying an Ubi or an EA? pay way more than they are comfortable with for a lot of bloat and wasted potential..
Sony has made bank on small but talented dev teams... I'd wager looking for the next Naughty Dog is way more in their game plan than another Activision.
Jim got a secret GAF account to keep up to date on MS purchases so he can buy a developer in response.you dont do a defensive action by spending 4 billion to acquire a game studio in few weeks.....
Lol pretty muchWould this mean, the deal will process faster? Considering the FCC are handling the case now.
Microsoft wasn’t named in that new bill or on the list of tech companies listed either so what are you implying?Sony is not part of the evil Big Tech the government hates.
It's just a japanese company known for movies, music, TVs and video games for them. Entertainment.
Jim managed to get the last dollar for the Bungie purchase.Show of power?
Lol.
So Sony buy as many companies as you want it’s ok because you’re Sony? And Microsoft no because you have more money then Sony this is competition? As if Microsoft stole the money they make or they make products and services that people buy.Also, Sony as a corporation is slightly smaller than MS. Where did the talk of “Nadella’s infinite pockets compared to Sony” go? We cannot celebrate MS being a behemoth and how they can use the Azure money to buy their way into the industry (FTC statement was “biggest technology companies, […] able to leverage their dominance in one line of business to gain power in other markets”) compared to Sony and also ask FTC to treat the two companies the same.
I dont like online GAAS so I'd be happy with an action RPG. Don't know about others though. My last played COD with Kevin Spacey and "Press X to pay respects". I played the VR space demo.Man the shock that will hit when their game is revealed as an action RPG and not a COD clone is going to be epic.
And money hatting 3rd party games to keep them from other platforms isn't just as bad?Buying publishers and making their entire portfolio exclusive is kinda lame. No two ways about it.
The government sees Google, Meta, and Amazon as the tech companies they’re concerned with.Microsoft wasn’t named in that new bill or on the list of tech companies listed either so what are you implying?
So Sony buy as many companies as you want it’s ok because you’re Sony? And Microsoft no because you have more money then Sony this is competition? As if Microsoft stole the money they make or they make products and services that people buy.