KyotoMecca
Member
Tim Rogers is an awful lot more interesting in real life than most other games journalists you could meet.
exoduster said:Hello!
Have we met? I'd be delighted to know how you came to know me and my thoughts about game design, or the research I've done. But that's neither here nor there.
I've read the entire article and I'm open to your interpretation of it. In retrospect I might have been too hasty in coming up with my own conclusion but the statement is rather transparent. I also find it sad that it's become rare for you to find someone who says something meaningful about game design. I don't know the situation but I'd imagine the level of frustration you must feel. I don't know how much time you spend with developers/designers but everyone has something interesting to say and always provide me important insight to how I can become better at designing games. It might sound overly optimistic but it's the truth. Maybe it's because you're a journalist and they feel you don't truly understand (I've seen this happen all the time) but having a pro developer lecture a young fool such as myself is a wonderful experience which is always filled with new things to learn (even after ALL these years). Whether it's at E3, GDC, CES, or even the new Games Synergy Summit I've never met someone who doesn't have something new to say.exoduster said:If you carefully read that paragraph you quoted from me, I think you'd see something else. I am not saying 'oh gee, look how much I know' - I'm saying 'doesn't it suck that most people out there don't have anything new to say, to the point that EVEN I feel as though nobody has anything to tell me.'
Thinking about it, how many reviewers/academics say something about games that you haven't heard before? Couldn't you make the same statement I did, if you were presented with someone who either said something, or organized thoughts into a way that made you open new channels?
:lol You haven't read his previous thoughts on Tim, this is tame compared to when he goes into rant mode (which seems to be weekly lately).exoduster said:But thanks for reading regardless, even if you didn't like it. Honest, well thought out criticism such as Drinky Crow's is really excellent, and I find it more useful for my personal advancement (because of course, I'm learning new things constantly, about writing, about journalism - I'm an authority on nothing. Except maybe Asuka 120%) than pointless character assassinations, or even blanket praise. Seems like a waste of everyone's time.
If that's the case I'd love for him to show that more often. How Tim handle's his articles can be debated to hell but the fundamental problem is: "Less Tim more content".exoduster said:For tims thing, I think his work is interesting to read as fictional pieces. I happen to like his writing style, and others happen not to, which is the nature of things. There's no foul there, certainly. The mistake is to presume that tim thinks so highly of himself. I know him better than most, and I can tell you truthfully that he's one self-deprecating motherfucker.
i dunno. he's a fun guy, but there are scads of cool people at ZD. well, less so after a couple rounds of layoffs, but you'd undoubtedly be surprised. every pub has cool guys and gals. even IGN!KyotoMecca said:Tim Rogers is an awful lot more interesting in real life than most other games journalists you could meet.
every good writer of fiction has to be a little psychotic. it's a collusive art by nature. i have no idea whether he's clinically such.Drinky Crow said:I didn't know Tim was delusional/schizophrenic. Is he legitimately crazy, or is his, er, "condition" just a case of desperate megalomania mixed with too much videogaming?
uhh... besides disco stu (recently laid off! and very talented!) you'll find very few people of that job description talking about this issue in this thread. THANKS TRY AGAINfart said:ironically i find the most deluded people involved in this discussion to be the "game journalists" sounding off on the proper method of covering a video game story.
oh, damn.
am i imagining, or am i IMAGINEERING???jooey said:but thanks anyway for adding another 6 pages to the thread DICK (imagine I am saying this 6 pages later)
fart said:ironically i find the most deluded people involved in this discussion to be the "game journalists" sounding off on the proper method of covering a video game story. dudes, you're covering entertainment news. if your aim is to give factual (yep hip and edgy) accounts of "video game news", you're no better than a tape recorder (or an episode of entertainment tonight, and none more interesting. i respect people like exodus here and crazy tim more than i respect the highly paid editors of our commercial periodicals for the simple fact that they aspire to think, no matter what it is they're writing. even drinky, who builds up complex and amusing but often puzzling systems of thought just to get around to playing a game, is more interesting than you maggo types.
FINALFANTASYDOG said:Yeah!, Hooray on people not getting absurd jokes! If you want real superiority complex look at the fun things some other people do. Watch them talk about how crappy it is they let in E.B. employees to E3, and that those E.B. guys just sit and play games and ooh arent writing for millions of people. Yet look! look young boy! see those exact same journalists get in on industry only days as press, when they are going for a site that probably gets less readership then an average E.B. employee influences people in a store! Hypocrisy fun! Tim, on the other hand will take an EB employee he just met, an E.B. person who seems to know his stuff, and ask if the E.B. guy can help Tim interview a gaming legend.
([/B]
KyotoMecca said:Tim Rogers is an awful lot more interesting in real life than most other games journalists you could meet.