Rossco EZ
Member
but i dont know if its gonna be on stream
hmm ok ill re post the stream in here again if they come back and i get into zoom
but i dont know if its gonna be on stream
hmm ok ill re post the stream in here again if they come back and i get into zoom
Bro that's not how it worksThe judge should order them to change their Bethesda deals whilst they're at it. Bethesda games were multiplatform prior to this... and it's basically forcing people to spend money on a new console and Game Pass if they want to play future Bethesda games. But old Philly boy wants to spout nonsense like, "when everybody plays, we all win."
Microsoft has come out of this looking a lot worse, and they've lost a lot of credibility from this.
lol alright sure seems you all like itbut keep the current kik open lol, it's good background music while working.
The judge should order them to change their Bethesda deals whilst they're at it. Bethesda games were multiplatform prior to this... and it's basically forcing people to spend money on a new console and Game Pass if they want to play future Bethesda games. But old Philly boy wants to spout nonsense like, "when everybody plays, we all win."
Microsoft has come out of this looking a lot worse, and they've lost a lot of credibility from this.
The judge should order them to change their Bethesda deals whilst they're at it. Bethesda games were multiplatform prior to this... and it's basically forcing people to spend money on a new console and Game Pass if they want to play future Bethesda games. But old Philly boy wants to spout nonsense like, "when everybody plays, we all win."
Microsoft has come out of this looking a lot worse, and they've lost a lot of credibility from this.
Did we see the Minecraft contract? I'm assuming it is a perpetual never ending contract for multiple systems then?
How are they obligated ? I've asked a few times but no one has been able to share any link where it shows there's contractual obligations via Notch or anyone.
If you mean obligated in the sense that it sells a lot and they don't want to disrupt that, sure, agree.
you'd think if it was true, the FTC woulda brought it up
You are right she cannot. A judge only has authority to decide controversies actually before them. So unless someone sued MS with that goal, there is no authority to start with.Probably too late for them to do anything about the Zenimax deal. For any big changes there I'm guessing they'd have to give it its own investigation & trial. Even then, the options might only come up to issuing fines.
But I'm by no means a legal expert, so could be completely wrong.
Oh, I know. It can't change. But I'm just saying what they did was wrong, and I'm willing to bet that everyone at Zenimax hates the deal now and probably was misled by the Microsoft team. I honestly believe people like Todd and Pete wanted Starfield to be on every platform.Probably too late for them to do anything about the Zenimax deal. For any big changes there I'm guessing they'd have to give it its own investigation & trial. Even then, the options might only come up to issuing fines.
But I'm by no means a legal expert, so could be completely wrong.
Created a poll. Please vote. It's gonna close very soon.
You sir are dumb.1. this what FTC said, and EC replied back saying that this is not true and they did not make their decision whether Microsoft had incentive or not
3 hour break ?
you mean 3 hours of elevator jazz.
Era is saying the deal is dead. That means it will pass, right?
Era is saying the deal is dead. That means it will pass, right?
Yeah pretty much,Era is saying the deal is dead. That means it will pass, right?
Can't see how the judge could possibly conclude there is no risk of MS foreclosing access after today. And two of the 3 largest markets after US are still publicly concerned, lending weight to FTC's claim they should be allowed a full trial before the deal closes. Odds of a PI issuing have gone up today IMO.
My guess is she issues it. With a decision that suggests there is enough reason for FTC to be concerned to allow them a trial to evaluate the deal completely. And references to other roadblocks (CMA for instance) as evidence of little harm to MS if they have to wait for a trial. I would also think she could dismiss any argument about MS and Activision abandoning the deal if she issues it as something immaterial since they can renegotiate if they choose.
It was stated that they had a pre-existing contract multiple times before MS acquired them.
How many contracts do you know can be broken?
There was a pre-existing agreement.
She still also has to conclude that foreclosing access to COD is an anti-trust concern.Can't see how the judge could possibly conclude there is no risk of MS foreclosing access after today. And two of the 3 largest markets after US are still publicly concerned, lending weight to FTC's claim they should be allowed a full trial before the deal closes. Odds of a PI issuing have gone up today IMO.
My guess is she issues it. With a decision that suggests there is enough reason for FTC to be concerned to allow them a trial to evaluate the deal completely. And references to other roadblocks (CMA for instance) as evidence of little harm to MS if they have to wait for a trial. I would also think she could dismiss any argument about MS and Activision abandoning the deal if she issues it as something immaterial since they can renegotiate if they choose.
Hey y'all, I'm a bit out of the loop, is this the season finale or is there gonna be more episodes after today?
It's possible it wasn't discussed with her. Which is alarming if the CFO is not in the loop on huge financial calculations like that. Yet, her knowing or not, it shows not only that Microsoft did indeed run assessments, with possible avenues for foreclosure, but also possible significant communication dysfunction at the executive level.
If the PI is approved, it is pretty much the season finale. Microsoft will announce they're walking away in a couple of days.Hey y'all, I'm a bit out of the loop, is this the season finale or is there gonna be more episodes after today?
What about Microsoft's claim that issuing the PI effectively kills the deal. Do you think that has a merit to it or just a hyperbolic argument?
Goddam shills.
1. I cannot find any instance in any of the records / tweets / verge articles about anyone saying that Minecraft has a pre-existing contract keeping it multiplat.
Goddam shills.
Jim Ryan said that they had a pre-existing agreement with Mojang. I heard it distinctly, but I haven't seen any reporting about it. Could be a mistake on my part, but I am fairly sure he said it.ok couple of things to point out here.
1. I cannot find any instance in any of the records / tweets / verge articles about anyone saying that Minecraft has a pre-existing contract keeping it multiplat.
2. Phil commented on thinking of getting Minecraft DUNGEONS as an exclusive, but then they didn't do that either.
3. If they really wanted to, and if such a contract ever existed, don't you think they would/could have renegotiated it ala Indiana Jones ?
4. The only official communique about even the thought of making Minecraft exclusive is stated thusly:
Goddam shills.
Goddam shills.
I'll be going to bed soon. I'm posting both memes. In case the judge gives her judgment today, use the meme that's appropriateA PI granted to the FTC would be crushing. Not one, but two major regulators would be standing in the way. Considering how weak the FTC is viewed, if they can convince a US judge to block, you stand no chance against the CMA. ABK would have more than enough legal argument to walk and collect $3 billion. MS may try to fight them in court, but ABK would just point to this and the contract stating they even stuck around after the CMA said no.
All Sony's fault![]()
The scale of this deal is beyond my pay grade so to speak, so that argument might mean more in this court than I would expect.What about Microsoft's claim that issuing the PI effectively kills the deal. Do you think that has a merit to it or just a hyperbolic argument?
Ah, the good old days.
![]()
1. Read my comment. I didn't say Microsoft made a commitment. I said they told EC that they have no financial incentive ... all the details are in my comment. And there is a clear lie.
2. The "new IPs only" argument has been just debunked.
It is a lie when they show the numbers that Xbox will have to reach for it to make it financially viable for them to make those games exclusive. Yet they make them exclusives 2 days after the acquisition closes and without Xbox hitting growth targets.Is not technically a lie if the incentive is not financial ... not in the short term... just like COD .. is financially crazy to take it out of playstation so that is no FINANCIAL incentive right now to do so .
The incentive therefore is another ... and the financial part comes later since they can take the hit.
At least thats just like i always have seen it
Yup yup i'm just wondering if there was a term date on the agreement? Like ... 5 years, 10 years, forever, etcIt was stated that they had a pre-existing contract multiple times before MS acquired them.
How many contracts do you know can be broken?
There was a pre-existing agreement.
Goddam shills.
All Sony's fault![]()
My guess is that it was a forever contract for all Minecraft games and Minecraft spin-off games.Yup yup i'm just wondering if there was a term date on the agreement? Like ... 5 years, 10 years, forever, etc
Goddam shills.