aliadiere25
Member
Just curious how their brain works if I'm being honest.Why are you wasting your time with Twitter idiots?
Just curious how their brain works if I'm being honest.Why are you wasting your time with Twitter idiots?
At least we play with style. It's why we are called the beautiful club.That's just Arsenal.
Thats fucking football right there. None of that pansy ass dick tugging smile for the camera bullshit. Men puke, men poop on the field, men deliver their new born baby on the side lines. Fucking hard core dick in the ass butterball foosball fuck it chuck it game time shit. Take it to the showers. Dicks get shoved in places you don't even remember. We win together we celebrate together. Football is back baby.
So now we wait.
It will be very interesting to see how far Microsoft are willing to go with their proposal, it will be demonstrative in showing how desperate (or not) they are to get this deal to go through.
They spend way too much on that app. And info they get is from that app or people who they look up to like Colt Eastwood.Just curious how their brain works if I'm being honest.
The art is simple.
Yeah fam, no one calls you that.At least we play with style. It's why we are called the beautiful club.
Sorry, I cant hear you very well. Speak loudly. We are not in the library.Yeah fam, no one calls you that.
I'd never go to the emirates, because London is a shit hole.Sorry, I cant hear you very well. Speak loudly. We are not in the library.
Sadly there are some users that bleed it into Gaf and try to push the disingenuously framed narrative from those shill tweets. Usually the avatar-less peeps. Especially when we have this thread here from the court case,Why are you wasting your time with Twitter idiots?
Or the face of someone who has burnt out the motor on their magic wand, after a 48hr bender.The face of defeat.
Rumor is it's a divestiture of the IP Licensing Rights for ATVI games for Cloud Streaming in the UK
Sounds like another 10 year deal to me.
Nah, those are behavioral. Divestitures are structural.
London is the pride of England.I'd never go to the emirates, because London is a shit hole.
London is the pride of England.
That joke was too much.
And this looks like a behavioral remedy to me. I'm betting MS is selling those rights for 10 years. CMA is bowing to pressure and going along.
Doesn't really matter what it "feels" like though. What matters is what it is under the law. FTC tried regulating with "feels" and "vibes". Hasn't really worked out for them so far.
See, tweets like this are embarrassing.
1. Sony didn't force Square Enix to make Final Fantasy a timed exclusive... they simply bid and Square Enix agreed. Square could have simply said no and moved on with their day, or Microsoft could have matched the bid or bid more.
2. Starfield was never going to be exclusive, it was going to be a timed exclusive. This means it would have been released on other platforms 6 to 12 months later. Yet again, Microsoft could have matched the bid or made a better offer.
3. Every gaming company has done the same thing Sony has for decades, so I have no clue why Sony is getting singled out.
4. Microsoft is literally buying other studios to make them exclusive, which is way worse than what Sony has done. Bethesda was not an exclusive studio before Microsoft bought them, but Phil has just made them an exclusive studio. If it weren't for the money COD gets from Sony, they would have completely shut Sony out of the COD deal. And if Nintendo wasn't as big as they are, they would have completely shut them off.
5. Microsoft is preaching about wanting everyone to play their games, but they're going in the direction of making them exclusive, which potentially shuts out millions of users and forces them to spend a crap load of money to play on their system. And that judge is adamant that this deal is good for gamers.
Of course it matters what it "looks" like (I didn't say "feel"). CMA's integrity is already being questioned. And there is no law saying CMA cannot adopt behavioral remedies so I don't get your point. I didn't say this was illegal.
It's all about shilling a PR message for the 2nd largest company in the world who's a victim, you see.Your number 3 point is what's driving me crazy! And many in the videogame media are acting as if Xbox didn't win bids to make AAA games exclusive or timed exclusives too.
Yes according to the law too lmaoMaybe for the purposes of forum discourse, but not according to the law.
Maybe for the purposes of forum discourse, but not according to the law.
It's all about shilling a PR message for the 2nd largest company in the world who's a victim, you see.
Yes according to the law too lmao
I think you may have got what I said backwards
Human nature when it comes to idol worship.But why lie by omission something that's SOOOO obvious? Some of these Xbox deals also happened within the last 10-12 years. It's not like the truth is hard to fine.
2. Starfield was never going to be exclusive, it was going to be a timed exclusive. This means it would have been released on other platforms 6 to 12 months later. Yet again, Microsoft could have matched the bid or made a better offer.
5. Microsoft is preaching about wanting everyone to play their games, but they're going in the direction of making them exclusive, which potentially shuts out millions of users and forces them to spend a crap load of money to play on their system. And that judge is adamant that this deal is good for gamers.
3. Every gaming company has done the same thing Sony has for decades, so I have no clue why Sony is getting singled out.
Ah, London. The NYC of England. Center of the universe for those who live there. Cunts to everyone else.
Uh no the English was pretty straightforward
It's only okay when our favorite brand does it. Permanently.But they did, they made a much bigger bid which Zenimax accepted.
Sure, let's be disingenuous and pretend Sony making Street Fighter, multiple Final Fantasy games and Starfield exclusive was comparable to a year exclusive of Tomb Raider.Your number 3 point is what's driving me crazy! And many in the videogame media are acting as if Xbox didn't win bids to make AAA games exclusive or timed exclusives too.
It's only okay when our favorite brand does it. Permanently.
Sure, let's be disingenuous and pretend Sony making Street Fighter, multiple Final Fantasy games and Starfield exclusive was comparable to a year exclusive of Tomb Raider.
Glad MS stepped up and shut down that shit. A mess of Sony's own making. Had Sony not been so greedy, maybe you'd see Starfield and future Bethesda games on PlayStation.
And like they wont win AAA bids going forward. Getting ABK wont Sony, Nin, and MS going after 3rd party exclusives.Your number 3 point is what's driving me crazy! And many in the videogame media are acting as if Xbox didn't win bids to make AAA games exclusive or timed exclusives too.
I liked this one too
It will happen to gaming to its just tht streaming ain't tht good yetSo exactly what happened to film and music entertainment industry?
It's only okay when our favorite brand does it. Permanently.
Sure, let's be disingenuous and pretend Sony making Street Fighter, multiple Final Fantasy games and Starfield exclusive was comparable to a year exclusive of Tomb Raider.
Glad MS stepped up and shut down that shit. A mess of Sony's own making. Had Sony not been so greedy, maybe you'd see Starfield and future Bethesda games on PlayStation.
And the people who flip/flop would deserve it. But most of us in the thread outside of some shill or warrior cultists have stood by our positions with consistency on M&A and not waivered.![]()
I'm already saving meme templates for Sony's inevitable Square Enix acquisition.
Because they don't know how to react when they're stuck between a tourmaline and a hard placeBut why lie by omission something that's SOOOO obvious? Some of these Xbox deals also happened within the last 10-12 years. It's not like the truth is hard to fine.
1. Microsoft simply could have matched Sony's bid or outbid them to make Starfield a timed exclusive, but they chose to buy them to make them exclusive, which is way worse.But they did, they made a much bigger bid which Zenimax accepted.
The game in question, Call of Duty, is not being shut down from any platform for at least 10 years, a term that Sony has agreed to as well.
Sony aren't being singled out, previous documents have also mentioned Nintendo games as well, it's just part of the lawsuit and discovery. If Sony has similar litigation in the future for a big acquisition, I'm sure they'll be busting out documents with competing exclusivity deals as well.
I still don't get what's the fuss, it's always a game of 2, one want to sell one want to buy. Same for exclusives, Devs accepted Sony or ms money because they though it was enough, when Sony brought a studio the studio was happy to get the money, no one is being forced, the companies were willing to sell, the same when you go public, you know anyone can try an hostile takeover it's your duty to keep 50.1% ownership. In the end the market will balance or collapse and start anew. When someone get greedy someone else step up.
Sure, let's be disingenuous and pretend Sony making Street Fighter, multiple Final Fantasy games and Starfield exclusive was comparable to a year exclusive of Tomb Raider.
Glad MS stepped up and shut down that shit. A mess of Sony's own making. Had Sony not been so greedy, maybe you'd see Starfield and future Bethesda games on PlayStation.