Microsoft / Activision Deal Approval Watch |OT| (MS/ABK close)

Do you believe the deal will be approved?


  • Total voters
    886
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Because Tencent isn't taking games off of competing platforms. Microsoft is purchasing and making shit exclusive to further their goals and "outspend Sony."

That... doesn't explain how they're winning at all. That's just normal platform-holder stuff (Sony and Nintendo also make games exclusive) and some copy/pasted words from an email that was deemed irrelevant. Tencent will still be the market leader (in the overall gaming market).
 
Last edited:
I remember hoeg had an interesting response once where someone asked him not if the deal will go thru but does he want it to go thru and part of his answer was that if you could pin point the exact moment the game industry was ruined thru consolidation you would want to stop it but he wasn't sure if this deal would be that moment. The idea of president is kind of like that. You can't set one until the worst has already happened
 
That... doesn't explain how they're winning at all. That's just normal platform-holder stuff (Sony and Nintendo also make games exclusive) and some copy/pasted words from an email that was deemed irrelevant. Tencent will still be the market leader (in the overall gaming market).
Tencent is the leader when they're not and when they are, but when they're not.
 
Nice edit bro! Sony is, indeed, the market leader in the console market. Thanks for reminding the thread!
pepsi GIF


Tencent still owns less studios than either MS or Sony, and they have never nor have an incentive to foreclose IPs as a non-platform holder like the current #2 in console space MS.
 
Last edited:
FTC argued this in court using market theory and case precedence and yet the judge waved it away. Dems the breaks, can't create new precedence and then go back right after just because it's a different entity.

Every regulator and a US judge have said taking the biggest franchise yearly exclusive would be no problem, and have almost no effect. Can't then turn around and say well Sony can't because they ASIAN.
Because there Asian?

Back in the 1980s' and 90s', regulators didn't stop Sony from gobbling up all those US music and movie studios and they were way more Asian centric then they are now.

I know your only kidding but c'mon, if Sony hasn't been buying US company's for the last 4 decades then yeah.
 
That... doesn't explain how they're winning at all. That's just normal platform-holder stuff (Sony and Nintendo also make games exclusive) and some copy/pasted words from an email that was deemed irrelevant. Tencent will still be the market leader (in the overall gaming market).
Tencent is NOT a platform holder. Microsoft is.

They are not the same. It's illogical to count Microsoft and Tencent as the same as they are not competitors.
 
Tencent is NOT a platform holder. Microsoft is.

They are not the same. It's illogical to count Microsoft and Tencent as the same as they are not competitors.

Microsoft and Tencent are absolutely competitors in the overall gaming market. That's just a factual observation. If you want to scope the market down to only "high-performance console manufacturers" (like the FTC attempted to do) then, yeah, of course Tencent isn't a part of that market. I doubt very much that Tencent gives 2 fucks about that though, considering they're raking it in regardless.
 
Microsoft and Tencent are absolutely competitors in the overall gaming market
Careful now, you're awfully close to saying they are competitors in the form of game publishers. If that's the case so were ABK and Microsoft and then we're looking at a horizontal merger which de facto leads to less options for consumers.
 
Last edited:
funny how everyone is mad at tencent for buying things but support Microsoft

that's why i want tencent and the saudi to buy everything they can at least it will be safe from MS
They don't see that Tencent is buying things so more games reach more players everywhere and everybody can play so everybody will win.
 
Microsoft and Tencent are absolutely competitors in the overall gaming market. That's just a factual observation. If you want to scope the market down to only "high-performance console manufacturers" (like the FTC attempted to do) then, yeah, of course Tencent isn't a part of that market. I doubt very much that Tencent gives 2 fucks about that though, considering they're raking it in regardless.
They are not competitors.

And it's not about FTC. Every regulator in the world defined the competition market as either: (1) Xbox/PlayStation/Nintendo or (2) Xbox/PlayStation. Tencent was never a part of that conversation.

And if you're saying that Tencent is a competitor to Microsoft only because they are also a game publisher, then Activision-Blizzard-King is also a Microsoft competitor, and then that makes it a horizontal merger between the two that should be blocked.
 
funny how everyone is mad at tencent for buying things but support Microsoft

that's why i want tencent and the saudi to buy everything they can at least it will be safe from MS

I don't know how anyone who knows of Microsoft's history would be happy they are buying IP. How long has Perfect Dark been about to come out? Microsoft hasn't shown itself to be a good stewart of creative endeavors for at least 10 years.
 
I don't know how anyone who knows of Microsoft's history would be happy they are buying IP. How long has Perfect Dark been about to come out? Microsoft hasn't shown itself to be a good stewart of creative endeavors for at least 10 years.
and these same people are hyping that microsoft will bring back every old Activision games back like prototype ( wich i loved btw)

we saw with bethesda, they did nothing, just took games that were going to release and made them exclusive
 
They are not competitors.

And it's not about FTC. Every regulator in the world defined the competition market as either: (1) Xbox/PlayStation/Nintendo or (2) Xbox/PlayStation. Tencent was never a part of that conversation.

And if you're saying that Tencent is a competitor to Microsoft only because they are also a game publisher, then Activision-Blizzard-King is also a Microsoft competitor, and then that makes it a horizontal merger between the two that should be blocked.
That's the problem when you mental gymnastics and goalpost around every narrative to shape it to benefit The Brand™

You eventually paint yourself into a circular corner that needs a narrative to dispel that narrative. Oddly familiar, that poster. Oddly, indeed.
 
And if you're saying that Tencent is a competitor to Microsoft only because they are also a game publisher, then Activision-Blizzard-King is also a Microsoft competitor, and then that makes it a horizontal merger between the two that should be blocked.

This one right here is interesting, how are horizontal/vertical mergers being identified?

Like how could a company like MS ever make an horizontal merger unless they bought Apple or Google? How could Sony make an horizontal merger?

It all looks very muddy.
 
Careful now, you're awfully close to saying they are competitors in the form of game publishers. If that's the case so were ABK and Microsoft and then we're looking at a horizontal merger which de facto leads to less options for consumers.

I'm actually not sure what the test is the regulators use to determine whether a merger is horizontal or vertical in nature, tbh.
 
and these same people are hyping that microsoft will bring back every old Activision games back like prototype ( wich i loved btw)

we saw with bethesda, they did nothing, just took games that were going to release and made them exclusive
It was selective.
They did nothing for Redfall, completely hands OFF because it was a turd, but for Hi-fi Rush there were fanboys praising MS to the heavens.
 
So from what I understand the judge basically said that since games aren't going up in price now that consolidating a humongous dev into a trillion dollar company is OK. She hand waved any consequences down the line with potential monopolies.

Oh and her son works at Microsoft. Yeah that real up and up.
 
I don't know how anyone who knows of Microsoft's history would be happy they are buying IP. How long has Perfect Dark been about to come out? Microsoft hasn't shown itself to be a good stewart of creative endeavors for at least 10 years.
because they are not an entertainment company. They don't have the culture for it.
 
So from what I understand the judge basically said that since games aren't going up in price now that consolidating a humongous dev into a trillion dollar company is OK. She hand waved any consequences down the line with potential monopolies.

Oh and her son works at Microsoft. Yeah that real up and up.

Game prices needed to go up a long time ago, unless you think developers/publishers are immune to inflation somehow.
 
Oh and her son works at Microsoft. Yeah that real up and up.

First of all, this isn't even remotely new "news."

Secondly, you should take up the concern with the FTC, since they are the ones that wanted this tried in Northern California. Also, Corley disclosed her son's employment, so....what are we talking about again?
 
First of all, this isn't even remotely new "news."

Secondly, you should take up the concern with the FTC, since they are the ones that wanted this tried in Northern California. Also, Corley disclosed her son's employment, so....what are we talking about again?
They gotcha. Shame ...

DependableCreativeHeifer-max-1mb.gif
 
(Bloomberg) -- Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan defended the agency's record in court, pushing back on criticism in the wake of its unsuccessful challenge to Microsoft Corp.'s Activision Blizzard Inc. takeover.

"In federal court, we have lost two merger cases. We have brought somewhere between 13 and 20, depending on how you count," Khan said in a question-and-answer session following a speech at the Economic Club of New York on Monday. "In the scheme of our merger enforcement program, losing two is OK."

But she acknowledged that the nature of the Microsoft deal – the company doesn't compete directly with Activision, the maker of popular video game titles played on Microsoft's Xbox and rival consoles – made the legal challenge difficult.

:messenger_tears_of_joy:

 
I always wondered where that sound font came from that I heard in some YT'ers videos when they play it to make fun of some instances in our perceived reality, or dashcam videos when a car hits another car. Now I know.

It came from Messiah via Tommy Tallarico Studios.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom