Lol! I don't know her.gif but she went from running windows to reporting to Benedict Arnold.Its not like She has contributed more to the mother company than Elop.
Elop was pulling some Infernal Affair shit.
Lol! I don't know her.gif but she went from running windows to reporting to Benedict Arnold.Its not like She has contributed more to the mother company than Elop.
Elop was pulling some Infernal Affair shit.
Nokia would have conquered the Asia market just with its brand name if it had adopted android.
Lol! I don't know her.gif but she went from running windows to reporting to Benedict Arnold.
Here's an interesting consequence. The deal only precludes Nokia from releasing phones under the Nokia brand until 1/1/16, as it is worded it leaves them open to release a non-Nokia branded phone before then because the terms of the 10 year patent licence doesn't preclude internal use at all.
I'm really surprised that MS didn't shut this avenue down. The new board could decide to buy a smartphone startup and sell the phones under the name of the startup until 31/12/15 and rebrand to Nokia thereafter. I don't see it as a likely scenario, but the possibility has been left open. Stupidly IMO, by MS. It feels like MS were desperate to get a deal done and agreed to pretty much anything to ensure it happened, including not having the Nokia brand for smartphones, leaving the door open for Nokia's return, and not actually buying any patents related to the difference but paying €1.7bn for a 10 year licence.
this isn't a good move to make.
nokia were expanding their range of windows phone devices with lots of different sizes etc. microsoft are pursuing the apple model of limited devices trying to dictate what the public want (surface rt/pro gen 2 being move of the same but better specs rather than, say, a smaller tablet instead).
Dude was sent in to destroy Nokia
![]()
Another notable departure is that of Marko Ahtisaari, Nokia's executive vice president of design. Ahtisaari will be leaving the company in November to "pursue entrepreneurial opportunities," according to a Nokia press release. He was credited with fathering the company's current Lumia design language, which has its roots in the ill-fated N9 smartphone.
thats depressing. Shit on symbian as much as you like, but Belle was pretty nice, and could have ridden the wave of touchscreen devices quite well, while transitioning in a controlled way towards meego (or android, whatever). That massive change really wasn't necessary
I ditched Nokia after the burning memo thingy.
You dont just kill a mobile os without a plan in place, and that plan isnt 'just buy a new phone'.
Its like Apple deciding iphone 6 wont let people use their old apps, or itunes or what not. If you have an iphone 5, you kind of start looking for alternative and stop inveting in the platform because you know its a dead end.
And I liked my N8. But instead of moving consumers onto another platform slowly, ie meego, and not slowly, but just not saying 'symbian is dead, you are now using a dead platform'... its... asking for trouble.
It was stupid.
Nokia could have turned it around, it had no reason to bet it all on windows phone. It was just stupid, you dont bet it all on an outside shot when there are many other, extremely viable options out there, that dont include shitting on your current customers.
They weren't betting it all, that graph is ridiculous. Symbian devices are still be sold, they launched asha, they still sell 60million dumb phones a year, maps was making money the whole time as was the networking side. Symbian was never going to recover against Android and iOS, ploughing more money into it just to inflate the market share numbers wouldn't have made any more sense than what they did.
The capacity was there in the rest of the company to hit the restart button on smartphones, they needed to do it no matter what OS they were going to.
They were betting it all, they said symbian was for their dumb phones from then on essentially. They didnt gor for Android and Meego and Windows phone, they bet it all on windows phone, the small os with next to no market share.
Moving from symbian to meego, and bringing your customers with you. They didnt go for that, they went for windows phone and left their customers behind, and when they upgraded? They all ditched their nokia phones, because they werent, at all, invested in the platform, because they decided the platform was dead.
That too.
First gen windows phones from Nokia? Screw them over too, cant upgrade to the next os cause Microsoft decided to.
Doesnt exactly build customer loyalty or confidence.
Its depressing cause Nokia make such good phones. But under microsoft? With their quality control? Haha.
One of the most enticing "what-ifs" of recent years has come true: Microsoft has purchased Nokia's Devices and Services unit, it announced today. It unites Windows Phone 8 with its biggest hardware supporter, and gives the company an integrated solution across hardware and software. Microsoft paid 3.79 billion Euros for Nokia's business, plus another 1.65 billion Euros for its portfolio of patents. 32,000 people are expected to transfer from Nokia to MIcrosoft, including 18,300 that are "directly involved in manufacturing."
The purchase comes on the heels of what appeared to be a failed purchase in June, though at that point it seemed as if conversations had broken off entirely. Now the two come together, in what outgoing Microsoft CEO called "a bold step into the future."
As part of the agreement, Nokia CEO Stephen Elop is stepping aside; he's now Nokia Executive Vice President of Devices & Services. Risto Siilasmaa was named Nokia's Interim CEO he was previously chairman of the company's Board of Directors.
So what exactly does Nokia have outside "devices and services"?
Which it does, or at least good third party options for the ones that are missing. There is generally enough to get by for a lot of people.
tat's not ouf of the question as both products are probably too far ahead in the pipeline to be aborted.
having a last batch of RT tablets would help MS maintain the decision to support RT for some years, when in reality they'll move away from it and build a two product lines strategy in the future with a Surface line sporting Windows, and the Lumia line sporting a revise for tablet Windows Phone.
they might eventually gap that bridge in the further future with 1 OS, built on the fundations of the regular Windows OS but with Here competently integrated, and maybe x86 chips having gained enough traction in the mobile space to be competitve against arm.
.
Which it does, or at least good third party options for the ones that are missing. There is generally enough to get by for a lot of people.
1. Nokia Siemens NetworksSo what exactly does Nokia have outside "devices and services"?
Question for Microsoft people: didn't Ballmer just did a re-org that split the Mobile OS and Hardware into two divisions? How is Microsoft going to run the former company known as Nokia in efficient fashion?
When they say 'in cash', what does that actually mean? The money is transferred from one account to another? I'm assuming Microsoft don't turn up with dozens of sports bags full of cash.
Dude was sent in to destroy Nokia
![]()
The best YouTube apps on WP are not created by MS and as such are not blocked by Google.Like that youtube app that youtube keep blocking because MSFT can't be arsed to provide an app that work with the ToS of youtube?
Nokia is dead.
Shoulda bought Android, a legit competition to iPhone. That woulda been the smart choice
Microsoft already makes a bunch of money from android in patent licensing agreements, not that Google would sell.Nokia is dead.
Shoulda bought Android, a legit competition to iPhone. That woulda been the smart choice
Share value isn't that indicative of much.Here's Nokia before Elop came in. They were already destroyed, in the shitter and nothing but a shadow of their former glory. There was no getting back from the iPhone effect.
![]()
You think google would sell android or were you just thinking out loud?
Here's Nokia before Elop came in. They were already destroyed, in the shitter and nothing but a shadow of their former glory. There was no getting back from the iPhone effect.
![]()
Nokia is dead.
Shoulda bought Android, a legit competition to iPhone. That woulda been the smart choice
I don't think google would sell or that MS could afford to buy google.I think he meant shoulda bought Google.
Hopefully this will mean the flagship Nokia windows phone come to ALL carriers at launch. Its the reason I went with an 8X over 920 on TMobile
Nokia is dead.
Shoulda bought Android, a legit competition to iPhone. That woulda been the smart choice