LOL. Thank you for acknowledging that the purchase of Studios and Bungie is not a consequence of the purchase of Zenimax....All of their studio acquisitions and potential future ones? No. Do I believe that Sony accelerated and expanded plans when they saw Microsoft go after one major publisher, and then another? Yeah. If you don't believe that, I have a bridge to sell you.
Calls for Sony to buy major companies are a direct result of what Microsoft has been doing. It's not hypocritical to expect Sony to respond in kind.
Huh? I'm confused. The Bethesda deal hadn't gotten approved by the regulators yet but they already had their next target. They are in the process of getting the biggest publisher right now. What I mean is that regardless of who and when, more publishers will be bought and their storied IPs will become exclusive. That is 100% certain.Isn't Sega the only publisher on that list of internal targets?
LOL. Thank you for acknowledging that the purchase of Studios and Bungie is not a consequence of the purchase of Zenimax....
That, after buying MS Bethesda, Sony accelerated is clear. That Sony's acquisitions and their plans to continue acquiring are just a consequence of MS starting an acquisition race, you don't believe it, don't you.
What is hypocritical is criticizing MS acquiring or attempting to acquire studios and publishers with the excuse that it is "going to destroy the industry" or "monopoly" while celebrating and applauding any rumors or attempts by Sony to buy Capcom, Square or CDProject.
What that attitude tells me is that what annoys some is that it is MS that buys and not Sony..... Of course the "industry is in danger" is the excuse.
They don't have 3 trillion. That's their market cap. They have hundreds of billions in cash assets to buy ABK.hopefully all of these should help Sony defense in the FTC argument.
Microsoft have all the money to buy everyone, they basically telling the whole world that "i have 3 trillion, FU thats why".
yea i know, im justy exaggerated but im pretty sure they have like 100x purchasing power compared to Sony.They don't have 3 trillion. That's their market cap. They have hundreds of billions in cash assets to buy ABK.
There is a limit to how much they can buy. Nadella and the board of directors are likely not going to just let them dump all of their cash assets into video game acquisitions instead of other investments in areas like Windows, Azure, and Bing/ChatGPT.yea i know, im justy exaggerated but im pretty sure they have like 100x purchasing power compared to Sony.
The point here is that no way Sony is going to survive if Microsoft kept buying companies like candies.
Why not both?Sega is a great get, they should have always gone for Sega.
The year is 2042, after a tired day at work Jim Ryan gets in his car and heads home, upon reaching his estate he parks his car and makes his way to the front door, puts the key in and twists, for a minute Jim is lost in his many thoughts "There must be a way to beat them, I just need to keep looking".At some point I don't doubt they considered to buy everyone.
Would have been interesting to see how that played out. As I recall, Sega is one of multiple large Japanese game companies that have been protected for a few years now by investment laws that only allow 33% ownership by foreign entities. Some have suggested there are ways around that. I wonder if the fact that this never materialized was a result of such difficulties, if Sega just said no, or something changed their mind.
I don't think it would have applied here. MS wouldn't have been buying Sega Sammy stock, just the Sega gaming studio's.
That was Microsoft's strategy, and I think you just explained why Sega Sammy didn't agree.Sega Sammy has no incentive to sell one of their most profitable divisions. They're not a struggling company trying to get rid of assets to raise cash. In addition, some of their other businesses have dependencies on their gaming IPs, like their pachislot and pachinko business, films, animation, and other entities. So it's not like they can get rid of all their gaming stuff and their other divisions would just operate business as usual. It's like going to Kadokawa and asking them to sell FromSoft. Why would they do that? That's their crown jewel. When a company wants to acquire another company that's not trying to sell, your path of least resistance is to acquire the parent holding company outright.
It's blatantly hypocritical when you say you're against big acquisitions because consolidation hurts or destroys the industry and suddenly you embrace the possibility of SONY doing it as if the answer doesn't hurt anymore....I don't believe that Bungie was the result of Zenimax. I do not believe that all of them were. I believe that some were. Because you do not watch your competitor buy a major publisher, something that just doesn't happen in the industry, and not have that affect you and spur you to make your own moves.
Sony's acquisitions are certainly not being driven purely by Microsoft. It is actually a combination of factors. The shrinking number of big third-party releases. Sony's newfound desire to expand on their IP, which requires them to be constantly creating new IP to fish for potential hits. Their desire to expand into live service games, which requires an expertise none of their previous studios truly possessed. Then, of course, what Microsoft is doing.
No. It isn't hypocritical. Because Microsoft has now attempted to buy two major publishers. One of which they succeeded in, the other is the biggest third-party company not named Tencent, and there have been indications that Microsoft might not stop there. Now we're seeing that Microsoft has even had their eye on Sega. Big publishers being bought just didn't really happen until now. So if Microsoft were to own both of those, and have shown a desire to own a third, how is it hypocritical to then desire to see Sony buy Capcom or Square Enix? The only way to declare that hypocritical and fanboyish is to be blinded by your own fanboyism and hypocrisy.
It's blatantly hypocritical when you say you're against big acquisitions because consolidation hurts or destroys the industry and suddenly you embrace the possibility of SONY doing it as if the answer doesn't hurt anymore....
And no, it is not necessary to try to deceive. Before MS announced the proposal to buy ABK, there was already speculation, discussion and many celebrated the rumors that Sony could buy big publishers and studios (Bungie was already closed).
Surely Xbox has a shed load more money to outbid PlayStation on any timed exclusives? Why not leverage these funds from daddy MS for that.
but this applies to Sega only? i mean its the logical thing to do unless they want major backlash from the public.
Yeah that would be what they would do if they acquired SEGA.but this applies to Sega only? i mean its the logical thing to do unless they want major backlash from the public.
Because Microsoft thinks that GamePass is their next Windows or MS Office.What happened to bidding for timed exclusives?
Surely Xbox has a shed load more money to outbid PlayStation on any timed exclusives? Why not leverage these funds from daddy MS for that.
No thanks. As a Sega fan that would be awfulSo SEGA can still happen. Nice.
Do you know why? Because the consolidation has already happened. In a big way. In a way we've never seen. And the options appear to be, A) Let one company gobble it all, or B) see other companies do the same to prevent option A.
Not at all . You are the one who misses the deadlines.The Zenimax deal was announced late 2020 and finalized early 2021. The ABK deal was announced January 2022. The Bungie deal was announced two weeks later that same month. It didn't close until much later that year. Your timelines are way off. Sony fans didn't know about Bungie until AFTER the Zenimax deal was long closed and ABK was announced. You think that may have something to do with it? They watched Microsoft go after two major publishers before they even knew about the Bungie deal. And that was nowhere near as big of a deal.
Microsoft corporate culture is still heavily influenced by Bill Gates who was legendary for his complete lack of decorum and shame. To put it more simply, he was a huge asshole. When Gates was CEO of MS he was one of the most legendary assholes in the history of the American tech industry and that's saying a lot. The whole company's culture reflects that mentality to this very day.At what point does MS say "fuck it, keep Activision"
This is very embarrassing and showing their true colours.
I forgot they have no shame and probably still try pulling the victim card.
Under Risks it reads:Continued:
There is another option. Show the same attitude and energy and criticize everyone equally.
The consolidation process was not started by MS, that is the lie. Tencent, Embrace, EA, Take two...Sony.
That energy against some started when MS came into play and that meant that they lost games on their Playstation... In the end your options are simply those of the PS user who is now worried that the current status quo may change. Not those of someone truly against the consolidation processes.
Not at all . You are the one who misses the deadlines.
Sony itself said that the Bungie purchase was not related to or in response to the Bethesda purchase and MS acquisitions. The negotiations and intentions to buy Bungie were earlier, which indicates that Sony was already in the game.
The uncomfortable reality is that the vast majority here against the ABK acquisition would celebrate any Sony acquisition even if no publishers had been bought by MS. The honest ones can be counted on the fingers of one hand.