yankeehater
Member
I dont think I am super hardline but I am definitely not a saber person.
Baseball players aren't allowed to bet on other sports? Why the fuck not?
I dont think I am super hardline but I am definitely not a saber person.
I don't have a problem with sabrmetrics, I just get annoyed when people use sabrmetrics as though they're a completely accurate indicator of future performance.
That is my problem also. People will say so and so was a negative WAR player last year so there is no possible scenario that he could improve the following year. I just dislike the way that people use the information.
Then there are people who see one graph out of context and say "stop playing the game, the computers have figured it out."
The Fresno Grizzlies have seen the future: the Houston Astros will be the World Champions in 2017.
The Grizzlies are so confident in the imminent success of their new parent club that they are giving away Houston Astros 2017 World Championship rings to fans attending August 15's game. It's all part of a larger Back to the Future-themed promotion, during which the club will wear Delorean-inspired jerseys with "The Future Starts in Fresno" emblazoned across the front.
The only thing it makes you think is that he thinks he can get another big payday.
I'd assume it's because they're worried that if a player bets big and loses, it opens the door to being indebted to gamblers and throwing games. It's less likely now than it was 100 years ago, but I can see the reasoning.
Didn't he threaten to sit out this season when he was still a Red Sox and then immediately stated he would honor the 500k contract after he was traded?No. How does it make me think that?
If so, why the threats to sit out the year when he was still in Boston? Probably because he wanted to force a trade?The only thing it makes you think is that he thinks he can get another big payday.
http://m.mlb.com/cutfour/2015/03/25...s-dreadlocks-for-charity-and-you-can-buy-them
noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
If so, why the threats to sit out the year when he was still in Boston? Probably because he wanted to force a trade?
First $400MM player.Harper will be a Yankee.
Harper will be a Yankee.
Is it mandatory that all juicers play in pinstripes?
i have no problem with it.
I can't imagine anybody giving a 37 y.o. Lackey multiple years. Which means some team will offer him $20M+ next offseason.
Is it mandatory that all juicers play in pinstripes?
Is it mandatory that all juicers play in pinstripes?
I was following minor league ball really closely during the moneyball era. Oakland was my home team's triple-A affiliate. They had some success so the whole saber crowd got really cocky. Now it's been further incorporated into baseball but it hasn't replaced baseball. Even so, it's a pretty big myth that scouts back then didn't know anything about sabermetrics. It's their job, so some stat geek throwing around numbers NEVER knew more than the scouts. It was the 90's, not the 30's.I feel like a bunch of people now basically ignore watching how the game is played and instead just cite sabremetrics.
That is my problem also. People will say so and so was a negative WAR player last year so there is no possible scenario that he could improve the following year. I just dislike the way that people use the information.
First $400MM player.
I have an inkling his example centers around Ryan Howard and aging curves.Can you actually cite examples of this? Because I have my doubts that anyone would actually say something so dumb -- that's not how WAR works at all. They might point to a player's WAR to say that he wasn't as good as he seemed (i.e. Joe Carter/Ruben Sierra-type players who racked up RBIs but didn't do much else, or guys whose defensive contributions were so bad they negate whatever they might do with the bat -- i.e. Matt Kemp/Adam Dunn), but no one who knows what they're talking about is going to say that because a player's WAR was terrible one year, it's guaranteed to be terrible the next. They'd point to the underlying reasons, like lucky/unlucky BABIP, or drops in velocity, or really bad contact rates...numbers with actual predictive value. WAR isn't predictive.
I was following minor league ball really closely during the moneyball era. Oakland was my home team's triple-A affiliate. They had some success so the whole saber crowd got really cocky. Now it's been further incorporated into baseball but it hasn't replaced baseball. Even so, it's a pretty big myth that scouts back then didn't know anything about sabermetrics. It's their job, so some stat geek throwing around numbers NEVER knew more than the scouts. It was the 90's, not the 30's.
That's also why scouts haven't disappeared. There are too many variables that can't be found in a stat line, particularly at the minor league developmental level. Players are trying new things. They're coming off injury or playing hurt. Of course their numbers won't look good, but the teams know the circumstances. So do the scouts.
Sabermetrics is grossly overrated.
If sabermetrics is overrated what would you call more traditional stats such as ERA, wins, AVG?
Fantasy stats? What are you expecting me to say?If sabermetrics is overrated what would you call more traditional stats such as ERA, wins, AVG?
Look nerd the only stats that matter are jawline and dick size.
The purpose of sabrmetrics isn't to replace scouting. It's supposed to provide a more refined alternative to the traditional stats.Fantasy stats? What are you expecting me to say?
I have an inkling his example centers around Ryan Howard and aging curves.
Didn't he threaten to sit out this season when he was still a Red Sox and then immediately stated he would honor the 500k contract after he was traded?
You totally beat me to it. I understand that Howard totally sucks now, and that isnt going to change. It just seems weird to me to say he is going to suck this year because of "numbers".
35 is a number
Getting into the numbers side makes me enjoy watching the games even more.
Baseball Between the Numbers is a great book. From Nate Silver's examination of hitting in the clutch to breaking down leverage to why "Beane's shit doesn't work in the playoffs" it was eye-opening.
$/WAR should probably be retired.There's no problem with sabermetrics as a method for evaluating baseball players and what happens on the field. That is helpful and should be encouraged whenever possible. The real problem is terrible sites like Fangraphs that continually misuse the statistics they generate for their clickbaity narrative-driven articles written by people who don't know shit. And because of their public nature and because of herd mentality sites like that become the go-to source for anyone interested in baseball analysis in lieu of them actually attempting to learn how these statistics work and draw their own conclusions.
I guess it wouldn't be as bad if it were just fans or media types who are guided into this type of tunnel vision by my understanding is that even those inside of baseball operations are affected in this way.