Very curious on which bid team Joe is joining. I think he'd obviously be good for the Dodgers but I am still pulling for Cuban.
This is just amazing stuff (not just baseball):
http://www.sbnation.com/2012/1/4/2681567/the-greatest-animated-sports-gifs-of-2011
Victorino getting smoked in the face was my gif of the year
i prefer the proctor trip and fall gif but victorino is a good choice as well.Victorino getting smoked in the face was my gif of the year
summarizes the braves season quite nicelywtf?
i prefer the proctor trip and fall gif but victorino is a good choice as well.
summarizes the braves season quite nicely
better than david wrightbetter than heyward, amirite
better than david wright
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bs-1hPkLKeQWould anybody be able to point me into the right direction of video of the play of Bo Jackson throwing out Harold Reynolds. I need to show this to someone and to my surprise, youtube doesn't appear to have this clip anywhere.
better than david wright
This is just amazing stuff (not just baseball):
http://www.sbnation.com/2012/1/4/2681567/the-greatest-animated-sports-gifs-of-2011
http://www.amazinavenue.com/2012/1/3/2678535/how-bad-will-the-mets-be-in-2012sorry guys mine was factually correct in 2011
David Wright - 118 wRC+
Jose Constanza - 101 wRC+
Jason Heyward - 98 wRC+
So bad.:lol that uniform
I do not recognize this man.
wtf?
yeah the bad ankle was the reason he came back to earth.This was the guy who came up and hit .400 for nearly a month before he got a tiny ankle sprain, causing Fredi to buckle and start using Heyward again, who continued to blow ass.
yeah the bad ankle was the reason he came back to earth.
heyward had a .373 OBP from the end of the Chicago Series to the end of the season. I hope Fredi second guesses himself more often.
So bad.
argh. not this again. Anyway, the whole discussion was whether it was sustainable. I didnt think it was and still don't. He played very well for a few weeks. Good, i love that he did. But if i had to choose who would perform better, i go with the better player and better track record. 9 times out of 10 that player outperforms the other and is the better bet. Hot/Cold streaks don't carry over from at bat to at bat, they are not predictive. There was no way of knowing if and when Constanza was going to start to slow down, it was a risk i wasn't willing to take. And if it wasn't for the ankle injury Fredi would have kept playing him like i feared until he went 0 for 100.According to B-R, Heyward had a line of .266/.358/.392 in his final 30 games, a stretch that started one day after Constanza's ankle "injury".
In Constanza's 27 games he played from his call up on July 29 to his ankle "injury" on August 23, Constanza's line was .372/.417/.487. He only started 6 games after that and was mostly used as a pinch hitter the rest of the season.
You tell me which line is better. The Braves offense was at its total best in August when Bourn & Constanza were going insane and setting the table for Uggla & Freeman.
I don't give a shit about coddling people. I give a shit about seeing the best team put on the field that gets them to the postseason and they didn't do that. Heyward was garbage all season long and should have been sent to AAA when Constanza flat out won the job from him. Heyward's a big boy. He knew what was going on.
with the playoff implications, that i think is too big of a risk. The ankle injury was a blessing in disguise. Got him out of there at the right time.I just don't think it's fair that they never gave him a chance to truly come down. I am not going to sit here and say that I think Constanza is a .370 hitter all season. I knew that wasn't going to last. But I would have rathered let him keep going until he sank on his own rather than slam the status-quo button as soon as he felt a tickle in his ankle.
with the playoff implications, that i think is too big of a risk. The ankle injury was a blessing in disguise. Got him out of there at the right time.
Just noticed that :lolWith the usual jersey overlap that happens, the jersey will read MAMI.
That's so meta.
no, i'm saying i thought Heyward would have performed better going forward based on his body of work and him being the more talented player. You can't say that because someone got a hit the last at bat so he is more likely to get a hit this at bat. The larger sample is the better bet.........so you're saying that you don't know when the guy would have stop hitting so take him out and put in the guy that was not hitting?
no, i'm saying i thought Heyward would have performed better going forward based on his body of work and him being the more talented player. You can't say that because someone got a hit the last at bat so he is more likely to get a hit this at bat. The larger sample is the better bet.