ERA is how many runs crossed the plate while the pitcher was pitching, divided by the number of innings pitched, times nine. Sort of. It's not really how many runs crossed the plate while the pitcher was pitching, but how many baserunners the pitcher allowed on who reached home. And they don't count if the umpires decide that they wouldn't have scored if it weren't for "errors" (defensive miscues) by fielders. It's actually really stupid but the idea is that since a baseball game is (usually) nine innings, and when the stat was created most pitchers pitched complete games, ERA would tell you how many runs per game the pitcher was likely to give up, in a rate-adjusted way so it would put people who started games or pitched a lot of innings on an equal footing with people who relieved or didn't pitch a lot. Anyway, a better measure is probably RA/37 (37 plate appearances per game on average; of 37 plate appearances against a pitcher, how many runs usually scored?) but people are used to ERA.To start with, what is ERA? And why does a batter sometimes get to walk to first base? Can't believe I'm hooked on something I barely understand
0-2 = unsustainable and you can make fun of this pitcher for how much he will regress, unless his name is Craig Kimbrel.
2-2.5 = godlike for a reliever, unsustainable for a starter unless you are pitching Jesus.
0-2 = unsustainable and you can make fun of this pitcher for how much he will regress, unless his name is Craig Kimbrel.
Not even Cy Felix. Though he may be referred to as Pitching Jesus.Like Cy Felix?
speaking of Zambrano, he needs to be taken out of the game..Not even Cy Felix. Though he may be referred to as Pitching Jesus.
I like my chart because it calls Zambrano a "fair" pitcher and that's exactly how I'd categorize him.
He needs to show he can get out of this jam and lead the Marlins in the postseason.speaking of Zambrano, he needs to be taken out of the game..
Not even Cy Felix. Though he may be referred to as Pitching Jesus.
I like my chart because it calls Zambrano a "fair" pitcher and that's exactly how I'd categorize him.
who are the braves using?
ERA is how many runs crossed the plate while the pitcher was pitching, divided by the number of innings pitched, times nine. Sort of. It's not really how many runs crossed the plate while the pitcher was pitching, but how many baserunners the pitcher allowed on who reached home. And they don't count if the umpires decide that they wouldn't have scored if it weren't for "errors" (defensive miscues) by fielders. It's actually really stupid but the idea is that since a baseball game is (usually) nine innings, and when the stat was created most pitchers pitched complete games, ERA would tell you how many runs per game the pitcher was likely to give up, in a rate-adjusted way so it would put people who started games or pitched a lot of innings on an equal footing with people who relieved or didn't pitch a lot. Anyway, a better measure is probably RA/37 (37 plate appearances per game on average; of 37 plate appearances against a pitcher, how many runs usually scored?) but people are used to ERA.
In general, ERA works like this (in this era) and this is how people react to it:
5+ = turd
4.5-5 = bad for a reliever, replacement level starter
4-4.5 = replacement level reliever, fair for a starter
3.5-4 = fair for a reliever, good for a starter
3-3.5 = good for a reliever, great for a starter
2.5-3 = great for a reliever, excellent for a starter
2-2.5 = excellent for a reliever, godlike for a starter
2-2.5 = godlike for a reliever, unsustainable for a starter unless you are pitching Jesus.
0-2 = unsustainable and you can make fun of this pitcher for how much he will regress, unless his name is Craig Kimbrel.
You can also be unsustainably bad but you are probably in the minor leagues.
Well yeah, I thought we were just talking about this year.Pfft. Felix has had two seasons where is ERA was in the "Pitching Jesus Zone"!!!!!!!
I think Tango Tiger has referred to Mariano as not just the best reliever ever, but arguably the best reliever possible. That said, he slots in nicely in the godlike category. These stats are really for single-year numbers, Mo has kind of had a godlike career.What about a 2.21 ERA for a reliever over an 18 year career and .70 ERA in 96 postseason appearances?
so soon? i thought there was a 15 day rule between call ups or something.I thought they were calling Delgado back up for that game.
What about a 2.21 ERA for a reliever over an 18 year career and .70 ERA in 96 postseason appearances?
Can't believe I'm hooked on something I barely understand
so soon? i thought there was a 15 day rule between call ups or something.
oh okIt's 10 days, but MLB makes an exception in the case of (a) replacing an injured player or (b) filling the new 26th Man roster spot for doubleheaders.
correct, you picked the padres.Hi MLB Gaf.
I'm back.
I think I picked a team too.
Hi MLB Gaf.
I'm back.
I think I picked a team too.
Hi MLB Gaf.
I'm back.
I think I picked a team too.
"He's my favorite guy". Kinda got me a little bit man. Kids
Hi MLB Gaf.
I'm back.
I think I picked a team too.
oh ok
correct, you picked the padres.
The Montreal Expos?
Hasn't the run environment (at least in the NL) shifted from this in the past 2 seasons? A 3.50 ERA isn't really a "great starter" any more. In the steroid era, sure.In general, ERA works like this (in this era) and this is how people react to it:
5+ = turd
4.5-5 = bad for a reliever, replacement level starter
4-4.5 = replacement level reliever, fair for a starter
3.5-4 = fair for a reliever, good for a starter
3-3.5 = good for a reliever, great for a starter
2.5-3 = great for a reliever, excellent for a starter
2-2.5 = excellent for a reliever, godlike for a starter
2-2.5 = godlike for a reliever, unsustainable for a starter unless you are pitching Jesus.
0-2 = unsustainable and you can make fun of this pitcher for how much he will regress, unless his name is Craig Kimbrel.
Why are you laughing, is it because of Jesus Floreshahahahaha
3-3.5, and this is taking into account the shifted run environment. During the steroid era 4 was above average. Obviously the upper extreme (3.5) isn't as impressive as the lower extreme (3), of course, but half-season ERAs can look a lot better than end-of-season ones.Hasn't the run environment (at least in the NL) shifted from this in the past 2 seasons? A 3.50 ERA isn't really a "great starter" any more. In the steroid era, sure.
4.00 is average for NL starters this season.Hasn't the run environment (at least in the NL) shifted from this in the past 2 seasons? A 3.50 ERA isn't really a "great starter" any more. In the steroid era, sure.
Why are you laughing, is it because of Jesus Flores
not reallyDamn it Vargas. You used to be so good, now you're a HR machine.
YEEEESSSSSSZambrano is out? Fuck.
not really
i thought davey johnson was smarted than thatThe best part, I think, about Lombardozzi hitting leadoff is that he doesn't really walk or hit for power, so you can limit your expectations.
He would love to put the high OBP guy on our roster in the leadoff position but unfortunately he doesn't exist.i thought davey johnson was smarted than that
StrasburgHe would love to put the high OBP guy on our roster in the leadoff position but unfortunately he doesn't exist.
He of the .500 BABIP?Strasburg
Seems like the Phillies will offer Hamels 120 million bucks. I would trade him and try to restock the farm system a bit but thats just me.