Mike Works
Member
It took me a few episodes to get into "Arrested" because I didn't fully comprehend the nuances of the characters (and fully why they were funny). There was background I was missing, but other developments that they've formed.border said:You examine only Michael for a reason, though....the rest of "Arrested" easily fits into established types. The spoiled rich girl, the arrogant bastard, the repressed artsy homosexual, the ungrateful overbearing mom, the pompous self-centered father that's failed his family, etc. They're so accessible that I don't even have to tell you which character is each of the aforementioned. None of this is a slight though, because the joy in both shows will be in watching the interactions between the different types and the crazy situations they get themselves into. It just seems wholly premature to say that there's no potential in AD (or AD) after watching less than ten minutes of a pilot episode. Even you said that it took you a few episodes to get into "Arrested".
Whether the similarities to Family Guy are as strong as some contend doesn't matter much. As I already asked in the other thread -- who really cares as long as it's funny? The ostensible purpose is to make us laugh, not bowl us over with creativity.
Macfarlane's stuff doesn't work like that. Peter hasn't "grown" or "evolved" since the very first Family Guy, but that's okay, because the writing's been continually fresh, and the characters aren't two dimensional. While Peter is a loudmouth pig, he's not a loudmouth pig all the time. Watching American Dad, the dad is a hardcore republican patriot all the time. Just like the liberal hippy girl. Just like the goldfish. That's all they are (though that could change, I just don't see it happening given that it hasn't happened with any of Family Guy's characters).
Arrested Development's characters can be type cast too, but I'd like to see one person try and tell me the 'awkward teenage boy' from both Arrested Development and American Dad are equal in regard to character flexibility, future potential, and so forth.