But they sailed East when they left the Middle East...
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has announced that a semiannual general women’s meeting — one that will include all females age 8 and older — will replace the general Relief Society and general Young Women meetings, which have been held every year for 20 years.
The switch begins next year, according to a news release. Relief Society and Young Women general meetings have been held in September and March, respectively, since 1993, the release added.
"The general women’s meeting will be held the Saturday before each General Conference and will be conducted by the general presidencies of the Relief Society, Young Women and Primary organizations," according to the release.
All women and girls 8 years and older will be allowed to attend.
"As the women of the church gather together — sisters, mothers and daughters — they, their families, and the church will be strengthened and blessed," the faith’s governing First Presidency states in the release.
The news release states that the First Presidency announcement came Friday, though the release was posted to the church website Monday.
Dude, I know. I think he had them going east then down and west or something. He was completely convinced. I thought he was insane until I was like "Well really saying that the nephite's got in ships in 600 BC that they made by themselves and then sailed across the Ocean without modern navigation and ended up in modern New York state/Canada." isn't inherently any less plausible than saying they ended up in the meso/latin america.
The only thing that he didn't have a satisfactory answer for was winter. I told him if the Nephites really did go from the middle east to New York/Canada they'd freeze and die within a year, at the very least they'd discuss something about winter and the hardships. His answer to that was that it wasn't "spiritually pertinent" so it wasn't in the BoM. Oh well. All apologists are crazy according to others. I suppose it does make the hill cumorah thing a bit more feasible, if not less romantic. I always thought "My god it's so cool that Moroni walked all that way for all those years." With placing them in Canada it's like walking to the next county. More realistic but certainly less romantic.
Also, I'm a fan of Zach Anner and he just did a video about the mormons.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzW1bCVUSx4&list=PLzvRx_johoA80G6wsT1KkOE8x7YbwXwNa
Really not Zach at his best. It just feels uncomfortable and forced and the questions are pretty softball. I know the church most likely didn't pay for it but they probably should actually. Getting stuff like this out there is much better than the pre-canned, corporate feeling "I'm a mormon" series.
Pretty sure that the landing spot was what is now Valparaiso, Chile. Anyway, I think that people take things way too literally in the Book of Mormon where it talks about their populations covering the lands. I think that's just a flowery way of saying, "there were tons of people." My feeling always was that the BoM populations were fairly concentrated in Central America and they didn't cover all of North and South America at any point. Maybe a few million Nephites at the highest amount, but probably less.
Pretty sure that the landing spot was what is now Valparaiso, Chile. Anyway, I think that people take things way too literally in the Book of Mormon where it talks about their populations covering the lands. I think that's just a flowery way of saying, "there were tons of people." My feeling always was that the BoM populations were fairly concentrated in Central America and they didn't cover all of North and South America at any point. Maybe a few million Nephites at the highest amount, but probably less.
LOL church reacting hastily to the "Ordain Women" thing. A new "Women's Session" pre-conference?
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/57084218-78/women-general-release-church.html.csp
I think they're going to push the "separate but equal" thing. Personally I don't know why they're doing this instead of the meetings they have in place. I guess this includes non Relief society/YW aged women which really they weren't clamoring for a meeting to begin with. I'll have to see what the wife thinks.
I dunno, trying to appease me by giving me more meetings seems a bad way to go about itHaving a womens meeting 2 times a year right before each conference instead of 1 time for RS and 1 time for YW makes having priesthood 2 times a year less "unfair".
I dunno, trying to appease me by giving me more meetings seems a bad way to go about it
The Mormon church stands to own nearly 2 percent of Florida by completing a deal to buy most of the real estate of the St. Joe Co. for more than a half-billion dollars.
The megapurchase was announced jointly Thursday by a corporate representative of church, which owns the nearly 295,000-acre Deseret Ranches in Central Florida, and by the real-estate and timber business, which has built several communities along the Panhandle coast.
According to the announcement, a church entity, AgReserves Inc., will buy 382,834 acres – the majority of St. Joe's timberlands – in Bay, Calhoun, Franklin, Gadsden, Gulf, Jefferson, Leon, Liberty and Wakulla counties for $565 million.
Completion of the deal will leave the Utah-based church with 678,000 acres, an area larger than any other private holding in Florida, according to widely shared but unconfirmed rankings of top landowners.
AgReserves Inc., a taxpaying company of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, will maintain timber and agricultural uses of the Panhandle acreage, according to the announcement.
"AgReserves has demonstrated its commitment to wise land stewardship and prudent resource management during more than 60 years of ranching and agricultural operations in east central Florida," said Paul Genho, chairman of AgReserves. "We will apply that same commitment and expertise to managing the property we are acquiring in Florida's panhandle."
Owned by the church for nearly 60 years, Deseret Ranches sprawls across Orange, Osceola and Brevard counties and is increasingly seen as critical to the Orlando region's water supply, road and rail network and future development.
Commissioner of Agriculture Adam Putnam praised the announced deal as long-term investment in the state's timber and cattle business.
"This transaction between two of Florida's largest and most committed land stewards is a meaningful reminder of the economic and ecological value of agriculture in our state," Putnam said.
Charles Pattison, president of the smart-planning group 1000 Friends of Florida, said there has been little pressure for development of the St. Joe timberlands, which are well away from the Panhandle coast.
But Pattison said no other metropolitan area in the state borders such a huge and potentially developable piece of property as Deseret Ranches, which covers a largely roadless and unpopulated area southeast of Orlando.
Last week, Gov. Rick Scott signed an executive order that created the East Central Florida Corridor Task Force to plan for roads, development and environmental protection in an area dominated by Deseret Ranches.
"It is more important than ever that we work together to plan our future," said ranch manager Erik Jacobsen in response to the task force formation. "We look forward to collaborating with leaders from the state and Brevard, Orange and Osceola counties."
With 44,000 head of cattle, the ranch property also is one of the nation's largest producers of calves and manages thousands of acres of citrus groves, vegetable farms and timberlands.
Orlando, Orange County and state water authorities have been planning for years to accommodate growing populations by pumping water from Taylor Creek Reservoir within ranch boundaries.
A St. Joe Co. official said the sale will help the company, to be left with 184,000 acres after the sale, focus on its real-estate development.
Uh, this sounds far more like and education problem than a religious one. I'm a male, but by the time I was 12 I could have told you the difference between the two purely on what I had learned in sex education..
Sorry, I've been meaning to get back to this for a while. Life has a way of getting in the way.
I can see why you'd say that, but this acquaintance of mine came from a very wealthy and educated family. This wasn't a matter of failing an anatomy test. Because she had never masturbated/explored herself she had not yet learned to feel where it was. There is a difference between knowing where something is in the books and being able to feel and find it on your own. Also, using mirrors to familiarize women with their bodies isn't uncommon. Many therapists recommend/prescribe propping up a mirror so women can see and explore themselves. And she, by far, wasn't the only girl I knew like this.
I know you argue that the church can't be blamed for everything. I'll give you that some people do need to take responsibility for their own actions. But when your religion teaches you that sexual sin (inclusive of masturbation) is next to murder at the fervor and frequency that the church does it's a little silly to say that you can't blame the church.
Thats a failing of some idiot parents not knowing the difference between knowledge and morality. Its not the churchs job to teach anatomy. Whether you agree with their idea of morality or not, they exist toteach morality. My 6 year old knows where her vagina is, because my wife and I are competent parents.
Oh come now, you're just being difficult. I don't find it difficult to make the connection that if a church teaches that sex is abhorrent that some parents will treat it as such. I've met far too many women that had such severe sexual dysfunction that they couldn't even touch themselves down there unless there was a strict medical reason. Hell, I've met tons of women that wouldn't even say the word "vagina" or "pussy".
Once again, thats not the churchs job. The church also teaches to take good care of the body, but doesn't teach grooming 101 in Sunday School. Thats once again, on the parents (and there are plenty of people in the church that could do with info on that topic). The church doesn't teach "don't even learn where your vagina is." Thats idiot parents either too dumb or too afraid to teach their kids deciding to avoid the topic.
This is exactly why My wife and I are taking responsibility for teaching my kids about sex. Church may teach the morality part, public school may teach the anatomy part, but we are going to teach both in a rational matter so our kids can make informed decisions.
Now the thread's full of people calling out how wrong this is. Great. However, again when the church keeps saying stuff about being modest and how modesty is an absolute necessity is is surprising that this happens? Nope.Earlier this year, we went to Hawaii for a week, she posted family pictures on the beach in a bikini and again in a tank top at a luau. Other ward members saw them, I guess, and freaked out (she's endowed). Then, a couple times after the gym, she ran the kids to and from soccer practice in her gym clothes, and these same people saw her 'without her garments on.'
Today, the Bishop called her into his office to talk about it. He said some ward members saw pictures of her on Facebook in a bikini, and that she didn't wear her garments periodically in Hawaii. He said they also noticed her in her gym clothes at soccer practice. He then advised her that, since she has facebook friends who are in young women, it would be a good idea to remove the Facebook picture of her paddle boarding with family a bikini. He finished the discussion by telling her that, if she finds herself needing to do things after the gym, she needs to leave time to shower and put on garments and modest clothing before leaving.
She was very polite and didn't cause a fuss. However she said she was very uncomfortable and felt bad. She didn't mean anything by the photos or her dress. She took the picture off Facebook but said she felt sad to have to remove it. More than anything, she feels more alone and isolated from other women in the ward after this. She will read all comments here and is appreciative of your insight in advance.
TLR: women in the ward complained about wife's bikini picture and non garment garb. Bishop pulled her in for a talk, and she's very sad and alienated about it.
EDIT: I would just like to thank everyone for your kind and heartfelt responses. My wife has and will continue to read them all. She/I can't respond to them all, but we will try. Thanks in advance for what is yet to be posted.
On Thursday a missionary from our ward returned home from the Philippines. His twin brother is still there, set to return next month, but he's yet to check in. Not good.
LOL again that's such a Masonic thing to do.I got a pretty great phone call at 9:00 Saturday morning. Apparently our ward has a new bishop and he called to invite me and my family to stake conference. I politely declined, at which point he asked what it would take to reactivate me, because it was his personal goal to reactivate as many ward members as possible.
I didn't want to talk too much about it, so again I just politely declined. He then offered this: "I just don't get it. You look so good on paper--married in the temple, former seminary president. Why are you refusing to live up to your covenants?"
I thought that was an interesting, direct approach to the question. Didn't do him any favors, though.
I have thought that the mission would have evacuated all the missionaries to safer ground/sturdier buildings.
My only experience with "disasters" in the mission were the man made ones. There were a few days where we were out on house arrest after 9/11, I thought that was a little paranoid.
Well, I'm getting set apart as a missionary at 7:45 PM tonight, then leaving for the Provo MTC tomorrow.
Serving in the Riverside California mission, English-speaking.
I'm going to miss GAF, having lurked here for all of High School, finally becoming a member last year and spending a disproportionate amount of time on this forum. Looking forward to coming back on in 2 years!
Well, I'm getting set apart as a missionary at 7:45 PM tonight, then leaving for the Provo MTC tomorrow.
Serving in the Riverside California mission, English-speaking.
I'm going to miss GAF, having lurked here for all of High School, finally becoming a member last year and spending a disproportionate amount of time on this forum. Looking forward to coming back on in 2 years!
I'm having issues and almost came to blows with another elder.
So a dude comitted suicide in the Las vegas temple apparently. Anyone heard the same?
So a dude comitted suicide in the Las vegas temple apparently. Anyone heard the same?
LAS VEGAS (AP) A 26-year-old man who authorities say killed himself in the courtyard of a Mormon temple in Las Vegas was identified Wednesday as the son of a federal appeals court judge.
Scott Greer Bybee of Henderson died in the shooting just before 6:30 p.m. Tuesday while services were being conducted at the temple, police and the Clark County coroner said.
He was the son of Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Jay Bybee.
No one else was hurt, Las Vegas police Officer Bill Cassell said.
In a statement circulated by a Ninth Circuit colleague, Judge Bybee and his wife Dianna Bybee said their son suffered from depression for many years, and they did all they could as parents to help him, including seeking professional advice and treatment.
"While Jay and Dianna mourn for Scott, and grieve for their own loss, they are grateful that he is finally released from his sufferings," said the statement circulated by Judge Milan D. Smith Jr. of El Segundo, Calif. "They have faith that he is in a better place."
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints spokeswoman Kristen Howey issued a statement calling the incident tragic and saying the thoughts and prayers of church members were with those involved.
Jay Bybee, 60, was nominated to the San Francisco-based Ninth Circuit court by President George W. Bush and confirmed by the U.S. Senate in 2003.
He has been criticized for authoring documents in August 2002, later dubbed torture memos, that gave interrogators wide latitude to use techniques including waterboarding during questioning of terrorism detainees at the U.S. detention camp at Guantanamo Bay and at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.
His statement on the death of his son said no decision had been made concerning a memorial service.
Mormons believe suicide is wrong, but they don't hold the person responsible, said Matthew Bowman, an author and assistant professor of religion at Hampden-Sydney College in Virginia.
Families are told that only God can judge the deceased, Bowman said.
Probably a young gay man who just couldn't handle how much the church loves him.
Eh, I've seen a lot of similar comments online, blaming the church in one way or another. I think that's pretty disingenuous, at least until there is more information. I'm not discounting that the church may have had a role in it, but I'm not a fan of people automatically assuming that it was primarily because of the church.
(Not discounting the fact that the church has led a lot of people -- including myself -- to depression.)
Well obviously to him the church had something to do with it. The question is just what?
Eh, I've seen a lot of similar comments online, blaming the church in one way or another. I think that's pretty disingenuous, at least until there is more information. I'm not discounting that the church may have had a role in it, but I'm not a fan of people automatically assuming that it was primarily because of the church.
(Not discounting the fact that the church has led a lot of people -- including myself -- to depression.)
You can be in the normal ward, you know.At some point, I'll have to leave the church because this entire situation is getting on my nerves and I'm not getting any younger.
So Tom Philips, editor in chief of MormonThink.com, former recipient of the Second Anointing and keeper of the supposed "October surprise", is doing an AMA on Reddit here:
http://np.reddit.com/r/exmormon/comments/1rajft/ama_i_have_been_asked_to_do_an_ama_on_november/
I've given him a hard enough time on the October surprise but still it's a bit entertaining, especially the TBMs asking him if he's neurologically ok.
He's at Doritos and Mtn. dew levels of credibility.
From the AMA:
It will be front page MT. It will also be on TV and national newspaper. And on as many boards as we can get to.
Don't worry, you'll hear.
Whatever it is, he's pretty confident it will be big. The only thing I can think of is perhaps it involves the use of tithing funds. Wasn't he a big financial guy for the church in the UK? Seems like that might be something he'd have inside info on, but who knows.