I watched Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows Part 2 for the first time since the cinema release nearly 6 years ago (christ thats a long time isn't it) and... I liked it more now than I maybe did at the time. The problem with film adaptations of stuff I already enjoy and love, particularly the Harry Potter films is that I'm so hugely invested and in love with the source material that I find it difficult to separate the perception of the characters I have from the books from the ones on screen, and thus I almost always think negatively of the film versions, despite whatever merits they may have, and especially when they signficantly diverge from the source material, or condense it down. These films seem to either assume the audience has a knowledge of the books, or just doesn't care that much and so can just leave certain details and subplots in the dust cos they're not that interesting (wrong)
Deathly Hallows Part 2 was pretty good though, despite that. They signficantly change the third act to make it much more action packed than the book and give certain character more agency and give others less, but it works for the film. I still hate the way they put duelling on the screen. Other relationships and character dynamics are either changed or way toned down on screen, which irritates me, but I couldn't deny it was a pretty good watch. In particular the gringotts bank robbery is pretty accurate, and looks great and feels very well done, liked it a lot. The battle for hogwarts looks absolutely amazing incidentally, even on the small screen, even if that too is changed or toned down quite a bit (no army of people coming back to help the death eaters, come on)
And the cast is all game, and all pretty good. It's amazing of the three actors they picked for the main roles in whenever that would have been, 2000 or 1999, all three of them turned out to be pretty good. I wish they'd kept the Percy prodigal son subplot from the books, and Neville and Malfoy's character arcs are pretty cut down from the source, which is dissapointing, as is Harry and Ginny's romance. I'm not sure on Ralph Fiennes as Voldemort, but he's a great actor and is certainly up for the role, so to speak.
Nowhere near as good as the book, nowhere near as meh as I vaguely recalled it being. I'm happy with that.