Probably just the way she's dressed. Too much skin. I mean people had the same complaint about Katy Perry on Sesame street and I've had parents complain about the dress of some of my coworkers at daycare. Parents usually prefer your breasts not to be emphasized.
MPAA Rejects Eva Green Poster for 'Sin City: A Dame to Kill For'
- Thread starter Code_Link
- Start date
- Status
Probably just the way she's dressed. Too much skin. I mean people had the same complaint about Katy Perry on Sesame street and I've had parents complain about the dress of some of my coworkers at daycare. Parents usually prefer your breasts not to be emphasized.
WTF. I have a bad habit of clicking a link marked with NSFW without reading the warning...
Eh, nothing wrong with popping a boner when you see an incredibly attractive woman naked, unless you clicked on that link at work.
Nicktendo86
Member
Jesus fuck that is a good poster. For shame MPAA.
Night Hunter
Banned
Man that comment is so ironically funny it almost hurts.
The obviously shopped bottom boob that is much larger than it should be considering the angle of her breasts on the inside.
Also the arm should be visible behind her breast, but obviously it's not so that you can see the totally fake breast shape better.
beato_angelico
Member
so the problem is that her boobs look too good?
Freezasaurus
Member
I saw the poster. There's nothing wrong with popping a boner when seeing an attractive woman naked.
AuthenticM
Member
Puritanical America strikes again.
NinjaBoiX
Member
RockTurtle
Member
that's the kind of imagery that even straight ladies have to give a pause for.
Night Hunter
Banned
I don't think the person depicted is actually supposed to be a woman. I didn't follow the controversy so I really don't know, but I think it's neither supposed to be a man nor a woman but a hermaphrodite.
She's incredibly lovely nude; and only a google search away.
But that is a pretty bad rendering to say the least upon further inspection. Her right breast is twice the size of the left.. in reality, her right breast is a bit smaller than her left. (I just googled, lol)
Nothing wrong with becoming aroused at a drawing though, lol.
The Librarian
Banned
I wish my boobs were that big. Maybe a little smaller than that.
But that's a great poster. That should've been approved.
But that's a great poster. That should've been approved.
WTF. I have a bad habit of clicking a link marked with NSFW without reading the warning...
I can't stop laughing at this.
I think you're correct in that the character the model is playing is supposed to be a hermaphrodite, however that's her real penis.
Denton
Member
Ha, that one is pretty good too
I actually watched Nurse 3D few weeks ago..not super great, but not horrible either. Decent flick.
Night Hunter
Banned
Okay, did not know that it was an actual transgender woman on the poster, hought it was photoshopped or something like that.
Escalation
Member
Good thing her shoulders are covered.
Funky Papa
FUNK-Y-PPA-4
Eva Green has some lovely curves, but it's her eyes what does it for me. They are disarming.
That'll be a hard R, even a NC-17
TitusGroan
Banned
Gotdamn, that poster...
LabouredSubterfuge
Member
I do not agree with this.
Agreed, although I wouldn't use the word disarming to describe them ;-)
Funky Papa
FUNK-Y-PPA-4
Gray Matter
Member
Well then...
Jason's Ultimatum
Member
You got that right
She's amazing
she's worth every penny.
YesNOnoNOYes
Member
she's so beautiful <33333
i wants this poster to happen *___*
she also needs better movies to star in. her agent succcccccccccccccccks
i wants this poster to happen *___*
she also needs better movies to star in. her agent succcccccccccccccccks
I wouldn't kill anyone innocent. But damn, that's a nice silhouette.
We need to have an NRA for breasts. Then we can support the nipple lobby.
We need to have an NRA for breasts. Then we can support the nipple lobby.
And THIS is totaly ok for our children to see
Children see nipples for a considerable time of their life, what is the problem ? =P
Welcome to America: Where parents let their kids play GTA but scream in outrage when National Geographic doesn't sensor topless native women in their documentaries.
People seriously complain about that?
Lone_Prodigy
Member
The way I see it, underwear is okay because people wear it under their clothes (also, flyers and stuff show that all the time). Cleavage is acceptable too because low cut tops are a thing.
But an image like this is pretty overtly sexual. Nightgowns are fine, but a nearly transparent one without underclothes doesn't leave much to the imagination.
I also think it's the action or implications of sex and nudity. A torn jumpsuit that shows underwear is fine, but a woman slowly unzipping one isn't okay.
But an image like this is pretty overtly sexual. Nightgowns are fine, but a nearly transparent one without underclothes doesn't leave much to the imagination.
I also think it's the action or implications of sex and nudity. A torn jumpsuit that shows underwear is fine, but a woman slowly unzipping one isn't okay.
family_guy
Member
I don't like her face. 5/10. Body 8.5/10.
Wait, did this happen? I mean, I'd believe it... but I don't want to.
AuthenticM
Member
Yes
Yup. Just ridiculous.
BTW, I don't think it's been mentioned yet, but the documentary 'This Film Is Not Yet Rated' is highly recommended. It's eight years old so I don't know how the people behind the MPAA have changed, but it's still really insightful and worth a watch.
IMDb link
Youtube trailer
Absolutely. And it's enough evidence to know that the MPAA rating system is complete BS. Had they not this eerie level of confidentiality revolving who's in it, I'm sure it would be well within a few civil rights infractions.
- Status