MPAA Rejects Eva Green Poster for 'Sin City: A Dame to Kill For'

Status
Not open for further replies.
DoktorEvil said:
I can't believe that THIS was the artwork Marvel and the MPAA approved.

There's so much shit going on here I don't know what to focus on.

My dad works in Advertising as a creative. Insert Mad Men joke here.
Click to expand...

First Class had these abominations.
x-men-first-class-poster1.jpg


PHK43jBC2KBsNP_1_m.jpg
Click to expand...
 
Halcyon said:
This is a movie poster which will be displayed in public settings with children running around. There aren't movie posters with people getting shot in the face or stabbed in the dick so I don't see what is so difficult to understand about it.
Click to expand...

The human body is a danger to kids mental make up? Really?
 
charsace said:
The human body is a danger to kids mental make up? Really?
Click to expand...

He didn't say dangerous, but there are things that aren't quite appropriate in a public place where you can expect people of all ages. This is obviously on the borderline, and in those cases there are bound to be choices that people might not agree with(I also think this isn't a big deal). But that happens sometimes.

All the cries of censorship and banning are rather overblown IMO. They cant prevent a private bushiness from putting up the poster, it isn't banned. It is just an agreement that theaters have agreed to abide by.
 
charsace said:
The human body is a danger to kids mental make up? Really?
Click to expand...

Again I really don't see how this is difficult. This thread is a perfect example. There is something special about some under/side boob. Most of the guys in here are furiously trying to not masturbate.


Having her delicious giant knockers on a display in the lobby of the theater is not going to go over well with most parents who are trying to take their kids to see Frozen. This is common sense. Maybe we will some day live in an America where there is hardcore nudity everywhere you go, but it is not this day.
 
Love the ignorance about what this poster is for, how the MPAA works with regards to theater advertising, how agreements between private business work etc. Yeah being okay with a gun on the poster is stupid, but it's been many decades now people. We know what the standards are for them.
 
Man, such an awesome actress, she is magnificent in Penny Dreadful right now. And a really good looking woman to boot.

And about the whole nudity/censorship/prudeness debate: There are posters hanging around here in Vienna for an upcoming ball, and there is controversy but they are still hanging around in public places. NSFW!!!

EDIT: Fuck this, not getting banned, google Life Ball poster 2014 if you want to see what real nudity in public looks like.
 
Halcyon said:
Again I really don't see how this is difficult. This thread is a perfect example. There is something special about some under/side boob. Most of the guys in here are furiously trying to not masturbate.


Having her delicious giant knockers on a display in the lobby of the theater is not going to go over well with most parents who are trying to take their kids to see Frozen. This is common sense. Maybe we will some day live in an America where there is hardcore nudity everywhere you go, but it is not this day.
Click to expand...

Haha, man you keep making these giant leaps in comparison. Side-boob is hardcore nudity? I guarantee that MOST of the kids going to see Frozen have seen their mother fully nude in the last year. Nudity (and this is not nudity) is not going to bother most kids, unless it's been made to be shameful by their parents.
 
Night Hunter said:
And about the whole nudity/censorship/prudeness debate: There are posters hanging around here in Vienna for an upcoming ball, and there is controversy but they are still hanging around in public places. NSFW!!!
Click to expand...

WTF. I have a bad habit of clicking a link marked with NSFW without reading the warning...
1337691032263.jpg
 
Too bad, that's actually a good poster.
 
stutte said:
Haha, man you keep making these giant leaps in comparison. Side-boob is hardcore nudity? I guarantee that MOST of the kids going to see Frozen have seen their mother fully nude in the last year. Nudity (and this is not nudity) is not going to bother most kids, unless it's been made to be shameful by their parents.
Click to expand...

Not sure why it is so outrageous that parents might not want their kids to other people naked. I would also think context matters. A parent being naked around their kid (hopefully) has no sexual context, which is the exact opposite of this sex sells movie poster.
 
aly said:
Not sure why it is so outrageous that parents might not want their kids to other people naked. I would also think context matters. A parent being naked around their kid (hopefully) has no sexual context, which is the exact opposite of this sex sells movie poster.
Click to expand...

Not sure what is so overtly sexual here that would be bad for kids to see. What horrible sexual thing is she doing that kids should definitely NOT see?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Notre Dame Cathedral re-opens
Event Science 
11
922
Trogdor1123 replied
  • Locked
Kill Bill: Volume 3 Apparently Appending
26
1K
Brigandier replied
Ridley Scott interview - sharks in the colosseum, Maximus returning from the afterlife to kill Jesus Christ, asleep at the wheel for Prometheus
45
3K
dem replied
28 Years Later - First Movie Poster Revealed
21
1K
nush replied
Spotify AI playlist generator rejects playlist prompt request for lack of inclusivity
24
2K
bitbydeath replied
Top Bottom