Explosive Zombie
Banned
Sorry, perhaps I'm missing your point... because you don't seem to be making one here. Let me go over my point again so you can respond. I believe, based on the information we have about TLOU2, that we'll see a negative reaction to it, similar in style to the negative reaction we saw to "The Last Jedi". As as result of this backlash, I said that I expected to see a drop off in sales for TLOU2 similar in scale to the one we saw for "The Last Jedi". That's my thoughts, and my point. I'm not saying TLOU2 is identical to The Last Jedi - I'm not comparing content. I'm comparing reactions to said content. If that wasn't clear before, I hope it is now.
Your counter-point seemed to be... to talk about how The Last Jedi made money, for some reason? We'll ignore that I didn't say it was unsuccessful - I said it triggered a fan backlash, and that it under-performed. Which, it did. Those are just the facts, not really up for debate.
It's certified fresh, and has an audience score higher than TLJ, so no. It bombed because, as JJ Abrams put it: "I don't think that people go to 'Star Wars' to be told, 'This doesn't matter.'" After The Last Jedi, Star Wars didn't matter for a lot of people. Solo was just caught in that wake.
Yes, there are fans who still whine about it. That's literally my point. And you really should ignore merchandising sales for The Last Jedi - they're very, very damaging to your narrative.
I didn't compare the two - as I stated above, I compared what I expect TLOU's fans reaction will be to TLOU2, to what Star Wars' fans reaction were to TLJ. I never said TLJ was nihilistic - JJ Abrams did, though. As for indicating a nihilistic world view, you know I can't provide a complete answer to that without posting spoilers. And this is clearly marked as a no spoilers thread, so I'm not going to be that guy. To be very vague, I'll say that nihilism is typically expressed very plainly as "nothing really matters". After what we've learned, I don't believe there's any other interpretation - Druckmann described it as a game about "hate". And I think TLOU's fans are going to reject the game, and what ND has done, because "hate" - especially the nihilistic version being presented - is a hell of a lot less palatable to a lot of people.
My point is that the idea that some backlash made TLJ underperform is overstated, in fact it's PERCENTAGE DROP (not raw dollars) from Force Awakens is similar to the percentage drop both Empire Strikes Back and Attack of the Clones saw from their own first entries.
It has worse critical reviews than TLJ by a lot, it's fresh but not CERTIFIED FRESH, that requires 75% or above, hence it not saying CERTIFIED FRESH on it. Also TLJ has an 8.1 average rating and Solo has 6.4. The audience score is LOL but I won't get into that, I'll just say IMDB paints a slightly better picture with a larger audience voting on it, but even then I don't consider it all that credible. Solo had much more problems leading up to release like all the drama about changing directors which caused a wave of anti-hype for the film. People also didn't care much for the trailers. The thing is... if people hated TLJ like you say they do it wouldn't be the 28th best selling blu-ray ever. Solo certainly doesn't make that chart.
So, for one thing, fans whining doesn't mean anything to me. The people upset are going to talk about something for far longer than people who enjoyed it and then resumed their daily lives, it's a poor argument. Also how well toys sell to children doesn't matter to me and says nothing about who liked a film and how much.
JJ Abrams is so brilliant, too. Yeah, there's no way to infer the game is nihilistic based on the leaks, and being about hate does not indicate the game will be nihilistic. There's no indication what-so-ever these games have no moral compass or that they think life is meaningless, it's a ridiculous argument.