So the Wizards are at .500 again for like...the first time in forever.
Just saw that last 3 by Westbrook. Lmfao. That deserves:
Just saw that last 3 by Westbrook. Lmfao. That deserves:
language pleaseThe Thunder are a team with a lot of talent and the same flaws year after year and Donovan hasnt done anything better than Brooks
also, Presti's move this year to make this team better was to get ***** ****. ***** ****. ugh
Haha howd this come about? I remember seeing it from time to time.language please
.......yes I'm sad by how pathetic my team has been......sucks after how good the bulls played without derrick rose for almost three years.
They played great because the real MVP on those teams was Thibs. Hoiberg is a fraud. Hopefully the Bulls miss the playoffs and clean house afterwards.
Today is not a good day to be a thunder fan.
I'm a rockets fan though so it's perpetually not a good day
after what happened in the 90s, watching the window for the bulls open and then close all because the Heat came up in the east at the same time is pretty satisfying. It's not 6 rings satisfying but i suppose few things are.
Finally got around to listening to Bill Simmons' podcast episode with Kirk Goldsberry. Their discussion on how the 3 point line has essentially marginalized the traditional PF's skillset was really interesting. I really like the idea of getting rid of the corner 3 in general (just draw the arc and have it end right when it becomes a straight line). I think doing that would allow the defense to defend the 3 better and force offenses to attack the midrange/paint more with post play.
They also talked about moving it out to 25 feet, saying it wouldn't impact your prolific shooters such as Curry or Redick, but for players like Love, it would drop the percentages enough to make it an inefficient shot.
As it stands now, if you can hit just 33% on 3, that's as good as 50% from 2 (and we know a lot of players can't even get the 50%). Goldsberry said that if you moved it out just to 25 feet, a lot of players drop down into the low 20s at that range. (Curry is immune, he's good from the opposite baseline.)
Wouldn't that also affect the corner 3 though (you'd have to get rid of it or it would just be an even more valuable shot)? I don't think the NBA will ever change the dimension of the courts for $$$ reasons.
Tie the longer shot into the corner 3 going away, just like the idea expressed in your post. Let the arc continue until it runs out of room for a reasonable shot (basically, the player's feet can't fit between the line and the sideline), then cut it off. At 25 feet, the arc will run into the sideline.
Stephen Curry and Andre Iguodala are officially listed as questionable, but Steve Kerr says Curry is further along.
I like this idea as well. I haven't been paying attention to college ball but is it true what Bill said about it having devolved into offenses burning clock and fishing for 3 pointers?
School 3PA 2PA Total 3P % of Total
Duke 694 1075 1769 39.23%
The Citadel 1104 1089 2193 50.34%
North Florida 946 1012 1958 48.31%
Akron 904 894 1798 50.28%
Lipscomb 897 1056 1953 45.93%
Elon 871 1018 1889 46.11%
Hartford 866 982 1848 46.86%
Belmont 864 861 1725 50.09%
Marshall 858 1042 1900 45.16%
Wyoming 829 746 1575 52.63%
Cent Michigan 821 957 1778 46.18%
Sounds like the Nets ticket sales are getting desperate, they invited me to a free game and event in which they'll try to get me to re-buy a season package plan, this time without a multi-year commitment. Apparently everything's cheaper too.
Meanwhile in Oakland.
I couldn't tell you about the broad trend, I only watch Duke and, by extension, the opposing teams that Duke is playing.
Duke has been a 3-centric offense for years, very perimeter oriented. There's not an over-abundance of corner 3 action, since the shorter line in general doesn't need to cut even shorter at the corner, but otherwise, Duke generally has at least 3 and usually 4 players that can shoot the 3 on the floor at any time and parks them behind the arc, opening up the floor for drives. However, Duke is often playing teams that can't hit the broad side of a barn (Carolina was something like 1-13 from the 3 against Duke a couple of weeks ago, for example).
I believe they said on the podcast that 28% of shots taken in the NBA this year are from the 3? I just looked up the stats for Duke, and they take 39.2% of shots from behind the line.
Going further, I pulled up some statistics on shooting, and it looks like 3s are really rampant among smaller programs.
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-bas...t/3-points/sort/threePointFieldGoalsAttempted
Just on attempts, a bunch of lower tier schools are throwing up 3s like they're going out of style. Here's a snippet that includes Duke, and then the top 10 teams based on number of 3 point attempts, and how those attempts compose their overall shot selection.
Code:School 3PA 2PA Total 3P % of Total Duke 694 1075 1769 39.23% The Citadel 1104 1089 2193 50.34% North Florida 946 1012 1958 48.31% Akron 904 894 1798 50.28% Lipscomb 897 1056 1953 45.93% Elon 871 1018 1889 46.11% Hartford 866 982 1848 46.86% Belmont 864 861 1725 50.09% Marshall 858 1042 1900 45.16% Wyoming 829 746 1575 52.63% Cent Michigan 821 957 1778 46.18%
I suppose it makes sense, though. Most smaller programs are indeed smaller. Just looking at a normal distribution, it's fairly easy to get a 6'1 guard, less easy to get a 7' big. Talented bigs will gravitate to power programs, leaving the smaller programs to make things work with less height, and therefore more reliance on the outside shot.
Has anyone heard if Curry is playing tonight? Kinda debating on whether or not I should go.
To be fair I imagine the Silicon Valley guys are willing to blow a ton of money on good seats. Even at their peak the Brooklyn Nets fans wouldn't pay shit for good seats, I like the stadium a lot and all the amenities but I'd never buy back in.
What's it like watching a game in Barclay's? Every time I've seen the Mavs play there on tv it always looks super dark like a strip club lol.
Do they do "Make some nooise" bs?
To be fair I imagine the Silicon Valley guys are willing to blow a ton of money on good seats. Even at their peak the Brooklyn Nets fans wouldn't pay shit for good seats, I like the stadium a lot and all the amenities but I'd never buy back in.
$1.4 million for a seat not even close to courtside? I mean I can imagine courtside seats for that price..
I doubt that's a legitimate listing. Look at almost any game on stubhub or whatever and you'll see tickets being listed for ridiculous amounts of money.
Walt Frazier was on Mike and Mike today talking about how he would stop Curry in his era with physical defense.
"He'd score 25 twos, but not 13 threes!"
These retired players really need to stop speaking on this. They sound incredibly dumb (and are apparently bad at math).
Has anyone heard if Curry is playing tonight? Kinda debating on whether or not I should go.
Walt Frazier was on Mike and Mike today talking about how he would stop Curry in his era with physical defense.
"He'd score 25 twos, but not 13 threes!"
These retired players really need to stop speaking on this. They sound incredibly dumb (and are apparently bad at math).
Well I have season tickets and could easily give them to some eager family members (which I do almost half the time these days tbh).WTF? even if he dont play, going to the game is still dope ....
These old guys are tripping over themselves to vomit into a mic about how great their era was.I'm not sure what Walt was implying. Is that a compliment to Curry?
Everyone trying to take curry down is insane.
Did guys talk about MJ like this?
yeah that was absolutely not shit talkI'm still not sure Walt was talking trash about Curry.