Sadly that is what the media wants to reward - ball-hogging, flopping, me-first play. What is the headline? WESTBROOK GETS 7TH TRIPLE DOUBLE. Yawn. Arbitrary, usage-rate driven stat. Dude shot 30% and his teammates shot 46%. Can we make an argument that he lost the game for them? (not saying he did...just saying that argument could be made...)
Meanwhile, Durant and Curry are having a blast just ripping through the league while learning how the entire thing is going to work, having fun, deferring to each other (and Klay), relishing and celebrating what their teammates are doing while employing true artistry in their endeavor (give me the Warriors passing any day over the low percentage iso/p&r drives).
MVP should go to one of them or LeBron at this rate.
I get the sentiment, but MVP isn't an aesthetic award. Take Westbrook off the Thunder or Harden off the Rockets and both teams are a dumpster fire. Take KD off the Dubs and they are a 65 win team. Even the Cavs are still probably a mid-tier East seed without LeBron. If Harden and/or Westbrook singlehandedly drag bad teams to 50 or so wins in the West, no matter how ugly it may appear at times, then they deserve strong consideration.