Yeah it's a coaching issue
Tonight? Nah they went against a solid team undermanned.
Our playoff hopes rest in the hands of the Nets and Hawks.
Our playoff hopes rest in the hands of the Nets and Hawks.
Our playoff hopes rest in the hands of the Nets and Hawks.
YES!!!
This team deserves to be in the playoffs way more than the Bulls.
Dammit Cavs. Still giving the Heat a chance.
Pacers got to win the last one.
Love this gif. The show is even better though. Wonder how many people that use this gif even know about it.
Wizards will beat Heat on Thursday. Unless they (Wizards) rest players on purpose.
So let me get this straight, given that all 3 teams won. They all have home games for the last game of the season. All three games start at the same time, 7 PM CT, April 12.
If: the Pacers lose to the Hawks, the Bulls beat the Nets, the Heat beat the Wizards
Then: Heat and Bulls win tie-breakers, Bulls get 7th seed, Heat get 8th seed.
If: the Pacers win, the Bulls win, and the Heat win. OR the Pacers win, the Bulls lose, the Heat lose.
Then: Pacers get 7th seed, Bulls win tie-breaker for 8th seed.
If one of the Bulls or Heat lose and the other wins, the 2nd gets into the playoffs. If the Pacers lose, both the Bulls and Heat have tie-breakers over Indiana iirc (not sure about the Bulls, they're 2-2 this season, but I think they have a better record within the division, courtesy of the Cavaliers sweep)
They probably will. It's an away game and they're set for the 4th seed.
Wizards will beat Heat on Thursday. Unless they rest players on purpose.
Our playoff hopes rest in the hands of the Nets and Hawks.
pacers beat a bum 76'ers by 9......while bulls smoke magic by 50 points!!!
we also swept Cleveland without OT's
Heat won 3 of 4 against the Cavs, with the only loss being much earlier in the season.
Heat would've already locked up a playoff spot had Waiters not been injured.
Anthony Chiang said:Dion Waiters told Erik Spoelstra that he's playing tonight. Spoelstra: "You think I listen to him?" Waiters won't play vs. Cavs.
Yup, makes no sense for them not to rest. But, I can see huge backlash if they did. Which is silly because them resting improves their playoff chances why risk your main play makers?
The Wizards players want 50 wins badly. They haven't hit that since Jimmy Carter
Yeah at this point it's down to how much they want that 50th win, because that's the only real incentive for going all in in this last game.
I called Montrezel being good because I now fully believe that any sub 6'9 PF with a high motor will be a good NBA player
Seeing him play at Louisville, I realized that not only did I want him standing next to KAT in Minny, but also that he was gonna be good.He's amazing when guarding perimeter players. Problem is when the opposing center is taller than 6'10'', we start to really start to have rebounding problems then.
He's apparently working on his 3 pt shot, which would mean he could get minutes at the 4 and really help our rotation. For how good of a defender he can be, with his versatility and length, we could create some seriously great defensive lineups.
Thinking something like:
Beverley/???/Ariza/Harrell/Capela
But that depends on his 3 pt shot becoming serviceable. Until then, he's stuck being stuck in center-by-committee (or depending on rest) limbo
That being said, it's not like he can't protect the rim, and you sometimes get opponents who don't seem to realize he has the same wingspan as our 6'11'' center.
I did a binge of the IT Crowd a few years ago. Pretty funny show.
Hell yeah, man
Jen is hilarious. The Elders of the Internet was great. Oh and "Why would I care that you were born in Iran?"
xD
David Aldridge said:In the end, I give the nod to Westbrook, a player who has defied history and back-to-backs and 24 consecutive missed shots in one game (!) and led his team to the playoffs when we all thought the only place they were headed was the Lottery.
"We thought they only place they were headed was the lottery"
But Vegas had their O/U at 45 wins. Maybe you were just badly misinformed, David.
If anything, it's the Rockets (Vegas preseason O/U was 41 wins) that are overachieving if you want to twist that narrative in favor of one guy over the other.
What all star does San Antonio outside of Lenoard? People this year think the spurs roster is really good and it's not. Lenoard is carrying the team hands down. L.A has not been an all star this year and is very inconsistent. No one else on the team is even close . Washed Parker? Old man gasol who plays no defense? I am spurs fan but I would be shocked if we make it out of the second round. They need better talent around Lenoard. Some of the young players look promising but they're not ready
Everyone seems to think Lamarcus Aldridge is no longer an all star caliber player anymore for some reason. I've watched plenty of their games and I don't see the drop off everyone else claims to see.
His career averages are 19 points, 8.3 rebounds, 48.6% shooting. This year he's averaging 17.3 points, 7.4 rebounds and 47.3% shooting. Those aren't significant drop offs and I would say the main reason for the slight dip in numbers is that he's no longer the number 1 option on offense. Leonard is the second best player in the NBA and has surpassed Aldridge as the go to guy. That doesn't mean Aldridge is shit now it just means Leonard is that good. LA gets under 15 shot attempts a game where in Portland he consistently got around 20. He also has been one of the defensive anchors for one of the best defenses in the league. Aldridge is still very much one of the top 25 players in the NBA.
Why include career averages, ever? His first season, he scored 9.0 ppg. He hasn't scored fewer points since his sophomore year.
Career average means you're including years when they're barely in the league
http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/a/aldrila01.html