panthapanda
Member
KD, you want to cement your legacy as an all time great? Do you want to be considered the holy savior of the nba and one up LeBron and Steph? Bring a title to the ATL. Every stripper we have will be at your beck and call.
I doubt KD even considers GSW if they had won the finals this year. Not that anyone there is happy they lost, but hey, could be a silver lining.
But damn... Steph and KD on the same team would be insane. Not to mention Klay and Dray.
KD, you want to cement your legacy as an all time great? Do you want to be considered the holy savior of the nba and one up LeBron and Steph? Bring a title to the ATL. Every stripper we have will be at your beck and call.
Durant is actually considering Boston?
*Faints
I don't follow Boston super close, do they give KD a better shot at winning the title than OKC? Pretty sure his #1 motivation is to get a title, and I'm not sure if leaving Westbrook to team up with Thomas is really gonna help much.
With players like Sullinger, Olynek, and Jerebko getting significant minutes I don't see how we could lose. Plus I see a lot of Westbrook in Marcus Smart (although it may be all of his worst aspects).I don't follow Boston super close, do they give KD a better shot at winning the title than OKC? Pretty sure his #1 motivation is to get a title, and I'm not sure if leaving Westbrook to team up with Thomas is really gonna help much.
I'm so surprised Atl doesn't get more consideration from big names. Sure the sports market is shit but, the A is black Hollywood. Probably more black celebrities and IG that models per capital than any other city in the US. And them skrippers.KD, you want to cement your legacy as an all time great? Do you want to be considered the holy savior of the nba and one up LeBron and Steph? Bring a title to the ATL. Every stripper we have will be at your beck and call.
I would like to tell Coack K that I am available for the Olympics this summer. Just so he can have some options.
I'm so surprised Atl doesn't get more consideration from big names. Sure the sports market is shit but, the A is black Hollywood. Probably more black celebrities and IG that models per capital than any other city in the US. And them skrippers.
If goes to GSW over Bos he is a COWARDI wonder how much shit is going to be talked about Durant if he does go to the Warriors.
I don't see how Durant helps the Celtics when they already have Crowder unless they convert him to center or PF.
Is this sarcasm? Durant is a once-in-a-generation type of player.
Don't know why people are so high on Crowder.
I think they're talking about Boston's clam Chowder.
Officially starts July 1st.When is the free agency transfers happening? Is there a transfer window like in football?
Pretty hood defensive defensive team:
Smart
Bradley
Durant/Brown
Crowder
Johnson (man, is there a Big Ben out there?)
.
I call racism
Isiah has been putting in that work on Durant's ear I see, lol. If they could land Durant and a spot shooter he could kick out to? Oh man, Look out East..
Crowder plays 3/4 depending on the lineup.
Pretty hood defensive defensive team:
Smart
Bradley
Durant/Brown
Crowder
Johnson (man, is there a Big Ben out there?)
Lol, that too.
Really we should just sign DellyYou want Jarebko and Oly in there?
SmartCeltics can also offer a 2nd max to another player. I think they are the only team in the 6 that can do that.
LeBron is totally the catalyst for a move like that happening though.If Durant goes to GS I never want to hear anyone call Lebron a loser or bitch for going to miami. Lebron didn't get embarrassed by the Heat, Wade or Bosh before joining them. This is coming from a Lebron hater for the pain he's cost my bulls lol
LeBron is totally the catalyst for a move like that happening though.
It's a "big 3" league now.
Problem is it makes the league as predictable and top heavy as ever. Every star has to join forces with other stars and stack the deck as much as possible to compete.I think it's just a change in culture. Guys come up in the AAU ranks, playing and becoming friends with other talented young players. Then they go for one year in college, often teaming up with other 4-5 star recruits at places like Kentucky or Duke or UNC. Teaming up with other great players isn't seen as a bad thing. It doesn't make them a "bitch". It's just the way things are.
Celtics did that first.
LeBron is totally the catalyst for a move like that happening though.
It's a "big 3" league now.
Problem is it makes the league as predictable and top heavy as ever. Every star has to join forces with other stars and stack the deck as much as possible to compete.
They did, but the players didn't conspire to do it. It just happened (along with a gift from McHale.)
Durant going to GSW would be awful. The finals would already be set before the season starts and it would be the same matchup for the third year in a row.
Edit: awful probably hyperbole
I'm fine with stars teaming up with each other, it just feels shitty when the team is already one of the best of all time.
It doesn't just feel wrong, it is wrong. We're well on our way to championships not being won through the draft and acquiring the right pieces, but purely through brute forcing free agency. Yeah, the league's always been star driven with dominant teams, but it was more competitive back then that is now. We had more rivalries, rivalries within conferences. Now, either you have multiple superstars or you're better off tanking, there is no in between.The league has always been that way, it's just that due to differences in the free agency and the trade market, teams could form their own super teams. 20 years later the Celtics probably would have had to trade McHale, or he would have left to his own team, same with the Lakers and Worthy. The deck has always been stacked though. You think the 80s were less predictable? When the Lakers made the Finals every year and the Celtics and Pistons were the only viable teams out of the East? The league has ALWAYS been star driven, which leads to dynasties and seasons where really only 2-4 teams are viable championship contenders. This isn't changing anything. The whole "super team" thing is something that lots of people hate, because it "feels" wrong, but nobody can come up with a real argument for why it's bad for the league. It's not bad, it's just different.
It doesn't just feel wrong, it is wrong. We're well on our way to championships not being won through the draft and acquiring the right pieces, but purely through brute forcing free agency. Yeah, the league's always been star driven with dominant teams, but it was more competitive back then that is now. We had more rivalries, rivalries within conferences. Now, either you have multiple superstars or you're better off tanking, there is no in between.
But it's not? They won one championship beating a Cavs team that was playing Delly and Mozgov major minutes and then got beat down by Lebron the next year.
73-9 and two plays away from back-to-back championships (that was far from a beat down) means your team is pretty stacked, possibly historically so. Also, Steph, Klay, and Dray are only now hitting their prime. There really isn't precedent for a team that loaded and that successful getting one of the 2 or 3 best players in the league.
Don't mean a thing if their ain't no ring.