drohne said:
lakers just got thoroughly cornholed. they just dealt away the single most game-altering presence in the history of basketball, and they didn't get an impact player or any kind of impending cap room. i didn't expect fair value, but this is absurd - the team won't contend for years. the team's treatment of shaq probably won't help their reputation with free agents either. i've been a lakers fan for roughly as long as i've been alive, but i can't say i'm looking forward to watching kobe shoot 40 times a game en route to a first round playoff exit for the next five seasons.
you forget the fact that he made a deal with very little leverage. WIth that in mind, i think Mitch did a very good job. I mean, he may not have gotten a franchise player in return, but unless Duncan or KG were on the block, we weren't gonna get anywhere near fair value in return. When you break it down, he got one near allstar-level player, who himself is only 24 years old (Odom), an up and coming talented 23 year old swingman (Butler), a serviceable, albiet injury prone bigman who will give you all he has on the boards and defensive end (Grant) and a 1st round pick. Thats pretty damn good when all things are considered. Sure, Grant's deal is a bad one capwise, but in 2 years he'll become a very attractive ending K to play around with in trades, and its also a LOT more flexible to have $30 million in cap tied up in 3 or 4 players, rather than just one. It'd be alot easier to work with than 5 more years of cap hell thanks to Shaq's contract. That would make it literally impossible to add any more significant players. You can talk about how bad this team might be, but believe me, a team of:
Shaq
Malone
George
Rush
Payton
wasn't gonna win any championships. And thats the team we'd be fielding (if not worse, once Malone and GP retired) for the next 5 years. Shaq and a bunch of scrubs and rookies.