Tallshortman
Member
Draymond finished minus-43. Is that bad?
Maybe another dick kick will fix that, at least he'll be +-0 after that.
Draymond finished minus-43. Is that bad?
My point was that even if the Warriors try to claim that it was unintentional there's no reason to give him the benefit of the doubt. It's a side effect of his style of play.That's every team's problem facing OKC.
Problem is Bogut and Ezeli couldn't stay out there and be effective, so there's no rim protection at all. Durant and Westbrook were having a field day.
Come on man...that play was far beyond anything he does regularly. It's entirely on him for losing his cool and not thinking.
I just don't agree with equating what happened to live by the 3 die by the 3.My point was that even if the Warriors try to claim that it was unintentional there's no reason to give him the benefit of the doubt. It's a side effect of his style of play.
But I personally agree. Obviously I don't know for a fact if he meant to do it, but it looked bad. And as I already said, Draymond has to control himself better. If he gets suspended I don't see it as any sort of injustice.
Oh yeah Draymond is getting suspended.
EDIT: Lol at this unintentional talk on twitter.
![]()
Lol Chuck. "I know for a fact but I'm just guessing".
I just meant that borderline actions sometimes go against players like Draymond. Reputations matter. So with something like this, that appears over the line, he probably has no hope.I just don't agree with equating what happened to live by the 3 die by the 3.
I'm surprised chuck isn't being more supportive against jones actions against biyombo considering he advocated for the Hawks to "send a message" last round when cavs went offLol Chuck. "I know for a fact but I'm just guessing".
This rescinded answer is lame as fuck lol.
For real. Denying it is understandable. Saying the call needs to be rescinded is reaching.This rescinded answer is lame as fuck lol.
I'm surprised chuck isn't being more supportive against jones actions against biyombo considering he advocated for the Hawks to "send a message" last round when cavs went off
Adams doesn't seem to bothered by it in that picture, lol.Oh yeah Draymond is getting suspended.
EDIT: Lol at this unintentional talk on twitter.
![]()
Everyone knows it takes a second...Adams doesn't seem to bothered by it in that picture, lol.
Seriously how could you say that was not intentional? I mean I get fanboys and band wagon riders. He did not even have to move his legs at all most people flare with their arms. If the league doesn't suspend him then I have lost faith in them and it will show the power that golden state has right now. Disgusting.
Seriously how could you say that was not intentional? I mean I get fanboys and band wagon riders. He did not even have to move his legs at all most people flare with their arms. If the league doesn't suspend him then I have lost faith in them and it will show the power that golden state has right now. Disgusting.
GS doesn't have anyone that can stay in front of Westbrook on defense at all.
So what's the over/under on Green getting suspended?
Lol at Durant and Russell's outfits during the press conference.
Without Green, how is Golden State going to set a million moving screens?
And by moving screens, I mean obvious chop blocks.
![]()
Game changed after that call. You're not gonna then suspend him on a guessing game if it was intentional or not .
Game changed after that call. You're not gonna then suspend him on a guessing game if it was intentional or not .
Game changed after that call. You're not gonna then suspend him on a guessing game if it was intentional or not .
There is 0.0000% chance that kick wasn't intentional. He should be gone a minimum of 1 game. If he isn't,the fix is init's straight nonsense.
does the NBA look at these things as isolated incidents or do they contextualize them with the recent behavior of the player in question? to me that's the answer to whether or not draymond gets suspended.. if the dude has been clean in the past, maybe give him the benefit of the doubt. if he kicked the same guy in the dick a couple days back maybe don't
If he gets suspended I have no doubt it'll be in large part due to the fact that he hit Adams in the balls last game and that he's often quite hot headed and gets tons of flak and criticism for his physical playdoes the NBA look at these things as isolated incidents or do they contextualize them with the recent behavior of the player in question? to me that's the answer to whether or not draymond gets suspended.. if the dude has been clean in the past, maybe give him the benefit of the doubt. if he kicked the same guy in the dick a couple days back maybe don't
Nobody in the league can stay in front of Westbrook.
Maybe Tony Allen a couple years ago.
Is Golden State done? Or do they still have a chance?
Is Golden State done? Or do they still have a chance?
Scott Foster told GS that he didn't think it was intentional but had to give the flagrant because of where it landed.
There is 0.0000% chance that kick wasn't intentional. He should be gone a minimum of 1 game. If he isn't,the fix is init's straight nonsense.
Scott Foster didn't have the collective outrage of the internet in his ear though. I wonder if the NBA will succumb to public pressure and suspend him anyway.
Oh yeah Draymond is getting suspended.
EDIT: Lol at this unintentional talk on twitter.
![]()
Lol Chuck. "I know for a fact but I'm just guessing".