nush
Gold Member
Buy a Switch.So Sony pipo cry that the forum only bans them, the MS pipo cry that the forum only bans them? I'm so lost as to what the narrative is supposed to be.
Buy a Switch.So Sony pipo cry that the forum only bans them, the MS pipo cry that the forum only bans them? I'm so lost as to what the narrative is supposed to be.
Again never said I liked it(never even tried to hide it, why would I?), I really don't get how it's relevant. In fact I dislike it very much, but that is not relevant to what I said.I hadn't seen this thread before but I just looked at the 1st page. Yeah, here's the thing, that thread wasn't about Game Pass or whether you like GaaS or Halo or MP . It was a positive Halo thread about the fact that Halo MP will be free to play and will run at 120fps. It appears the initial responses were very positive even from some Sony fans until you popped in with less than 20 responses posted and dropped in to make this negative & irrelevant shitpost bitching about Game Pass:
Later on in the posts you linked you managed to let us know you also don't like Halo or multiplayer. It's pretty obvious you were there to troll and maybe you honestly don't realize how you come across, but it seems like you do a lot of negative trolling especially anything positive about Xbox.
It's becoming a habit for you to enter threads and shitpost about them. How about you stick to topics that interest you and you don't try and start console wars?
Good points.They tend to look at behavior patterns not just a single instance, they also tend to look at a thread's general flow, it's not about not allowing disagreement it's about which posters disturb that flow. Again, the flow being in a certain direction is NOT because it's an echo chamber prior to that person posting, it's more that the debate that includes positive and negative takes hasn't derailed the thread and made it more about that poster than the topic. That's what I tend to see with the moderation, the idea is to make sure the individual threads facilitate healthy discussion... this CAN mean that someone who is articulate, reasonable and so forth but posts a view "beyond the pale" for that thread can still derail the thread and that can still be construed as a problem. As an anecdotal example let's say you have a thread about next-gen consoles and as people debate the pros and cons you... politely, articulately and carefully put forward an argument that you predict both consoles will be less powerful than an eventual new Nintendo console such as a Switch Pro which will be akin' to a space age PC when it launches. No matter how well you put your ideas forward and how theoretical and impossible to prove/disprove they are, it's such a wild take that it could derail the thread especially if you keep insisting on such a stance and argue it with every person. That's kind of a weird example but you get it. Sometimes you'll have certain threads dedicated to something in specific, like each console has its own thread, games have their own threads as well as community threads, if you go into the HaloGAF community thread to tell everyone every Halo game is bad and always has been you're disrupting that thread no matter how well worded your reply, it doesn't mean you can't have that viewpoint, it's respecting the intention of threads and the environment they're meant to create.
Know what I do when I see a thread title about something I don't like and am not interested in? I don't go in.
Some have referred to me as a hero.
In the old days, that was called common sense.
But but I got to make myself look cool to a bunch of random people online since I am pathetic in the real worldIrrespective of OP and anything else, this...
...is good advice for everyone.
Have more fun on Gaf rather than constantly trying to score obnoxious gotchas and hot takes on things you don’t like.
That sounds like the kind of excuses you would get from people that are trying to make McDonald's stop selling burgers to make it more healthy.They tend to look at behavior patterns not just a single instance, they also tend to look at a thread's general flow, it's not about not allowing disagreement it's about which posters disturb that flow. Again, the flow being in a certain direction is NOT because it's an echo chamber prior to that person posting, it's more that the debate that includes positive and negative takes hasn't derailed the thread and made it more about that poster than the topic. That's what I tend to see with the moderation, the idea is to make sure the individual threads facilitate healthy discussion... this CAN mean that someone who is articulate, reasonable and so forth but posts a view "beyond the pale" for that thread can still derail the thread and that can still be construed as a problem. As an anecdotal example let's say you have a thread about next-gen consoles and as people debate the pros and cons you... politely, articulately and carefully put forward an argument that you predict both consoles will be less powerful than an eventual new Nintendo console such as a Switch Pro which will be akin' to a space age PC when it launches. No matter how well you put your ideas forward and how theoretical and impossible to prove/disprove they are, it's such a wild take that it could derail the thread especially if you keep insisting on such a stance and argue it with every person. That's kind of a weird example but you get it. Sometimes you'll have certain threads dedicated to something in specific, like each console has its own thread, games have their own threads as well as community threads, if you go into the HaloGAF community thread to tell everyone every Halo game is bad and always has been you're disrupting that thread no matter how well worded your reply, it doesn't mean you can't have that viewpoint, it's respecting the intention of threads and the environment they're meant to create.
You are free but you complain about other people not having the same opinion as you instead of having their own ?Sounds like the kind of people that would ban burgers on McDonald to make it healthy.
As I said before if I said the same things I do about EA or Ubi, I would not have a warning, so it's only a matter of Xbox fans being snowflakes.
Same thing with Phil and Don Mattrick, it's always open season on Donny but you have to pretend not to see Phil's bullshit.
I wasn't on HaloGaf, whatever that is, I was on a news posts saying MS's biggest IP went F2P.
I'll not change how I post and if I get banned it will be just like last time and I'll wear it as a badge of honor. Nothing is more lame than a safe space and this corporate kumbaya worship "we are all gamers", ew.
On old Gaf I got a warning for saying the 3DS hardware was trash, that's just true.
Your avatar looks so annoying
I know haha. Same here.He isn't wrong though. Still bought 4 fucking 3DS' though.
I'm complaining about what? I only have a problem with me getting a warning while some guy PM insults and get away with it.You are free but you complain about other people not having the same opinion as you instead of having their own ?
He isn't wrong though. Still bought 4 fucking 3DS' though.
How do you know he didn’t get a warning?I'm complaining about what? I only have a problem with me getting a warning while some guy PM insults and get away with it.
Where did I complain about anyone's opinion? It doesn't bother me at all to see people that don't agree with me.
He doesn't have a mark on him like me.How do you know he didn’t get a warning?
The tag is different then a warning. You got a warning and a custom tag, and I think you didn’t get the tag until a while after your warning. When you first came in here to question the warning the tag wasn’t there. (If I recall correctly)He doesn't have a mark on him like me.
Hum, I should have a tag like this then: "Trigger warning: ignore this guy if you are too sensible."The tag is different then a warning. You got a warning and a custom tag, and I think you didn’t get the tag until a while after your warning. When you first came in here to question the warning the tag wasn’t there. (If I recall correctly)
I thought he had that tag already, tbh, but the date has since changed.The tag is different then a warning. You got a warning and a custom tag, and I think you didn’t get the tag until a while after your warning. When you first came in here to question the warning the tag wasn’t there. (If I recall correctly)
It's not being able to take a step back for a sec and say 'dont think we're gonna end up on the same page here' and always trying to get the last word in. Shows some kind of immaturity, not being able to process a warning that nice and writing about it another in some sense, but it can also be helpul if people point out where you went wrong in this thread.
Just take it as constructive criticism and think or ask how you can improve. In a sense we're a society that should be self correcting, I see reporting or ignoring somebody as a last ditch effort.
You probably were a bit of a dick.
Not seeing the picture.
IGN does not allow embedding from their forums. Just visit it in the link.Not seeing the picture.
Access denied. Thanks for the info but don't worry, can't be that important.IGN does not allow embedding from their forums. Just visit it in the link.
I vaguely remember what you did, and it wasn't amazing. Check your last created threads.Does anyone have any experience getting thread posting privileges removed? I assume I did something wrong, but I'd like to know what so I don't do it again.
Sadly I have some experience with that. You probably created too many edgy or threads that are not a good fit for Neogaf.Does anyone have any experience getting thread posting privileges removed? I assume I did something wrong, but I'd like to know what so I don't do it again.
Sadly I have some experience with that. You probably created too many edgy or threads that are not a good fit for Neogaf.
Don't beg to have them returned and don't be a bitch about it and one day they'll be given back to you.
Just don't go full retard and be salty about it. Trust me, I have experience.
Try to PM a mod about the issue, they might help (explain).Yeah, not salty about it. Just genuinely wanted to know what I did wrong. The one good thing about REEEE is they give clear reasons why bannings were issued or threads were locked. If I did the crime I'll do the time.
Never.Just don't go full retard
The one good thing about REEEE is they give clear reasons why bannings were issued or threads were locked.
They don't, please don't be disingenious, you know better.
I don't think he meant that.Men_in_Boxes
I've heard it really helps your cause if you wish the owner of the site a happy Easter and call him a cunt.
I'm expecting you to go full retard within the hour
Just genuinely wanted to know what I did wrong.
Does anyone have any experience getting thread posting privileges removed? I assume I did something wrong, but I'd like to know what so I don't do it again.
Have you noticed a rise in anti XBox sentiment on NeoGAF as of late?
XBox has been in the dark ages over the last 7 years. Ever since they axed first party development studios, tried to market the XBO as an always online device, and attempted to bundle Kinect with their console (thus losing the price war with PlayStation), it's been mostly rough going for team...www.neogaf.com
Post 15, read it. Also console warring, of course.
Yes. So be careful how you interact with gold members in the future.I tried PMing a few mods but they're probably inundated with messages
Wait a second! Are members with GOLD names moderators?! This is invaluable information if true.
Gold > Red > Blue.Are members with GOLD names moderators?!
u be talkin that shit fam?NM half aren't gold.
You were classed as the mod of Gamingu be talkin that shit fam?
*logs out of Neogaf*
You can decide to bling dat gold or stay trve? Heck, I might do a donaterino.when i pressed post, half of you dossers had down-graded to blue, making my already shit joke, even shitter!
before you do, tell me who the chick in your avy isYou can decide to bling dat gold or stay trve? Heck, I might do a donaterino.
You were classed as the mod of Gaming
hariseldon mod of community
deep enigma mod of politics
cunth mod of OT
Tesseract takes no shit
when i pressed post, half of you dossers had down-graded to blue, making my already shit joke, even shitter!