MasterCornholio
Member
As I said to the other person, having all these options would be the best outcome.
Wouldn't the mobos have to be designed to accommodate those slots and the cases as well?
As I said to the other person, having all these options would be the best outcome.
Says the person who called another user a stan and shill
Lol, afterall that, some folks would still like the option to use series ssd's on PC.
How is having the option a bad thing?
Wouldn't the mobos have to be designed to accommodate those slots and the cases as well?
For what reason exactly?
Per GB they are more expensive than any other equivalent speed drive out there (double the price in fact) and they have zero utility outside of Series consoles. Who are these people who desperately want to slot one of these into their PC instead of using one of the many open standard options available to them already?
Is it cheaper? Nope.
Is it faster? Nope.
Is it better? Nope.
So...
For what reason exactly?
Per GB they are more expensive than any other equivalent speed drive out there (double the price in fact) and they have zero utility outside of Series consoles. Who are these people who desperately want to slot one of these into their PC instead of using one of the many open standard options available to them already?
Is it cheaper? Nope.
Is it faster? Nope.
Is it better? Nope.
So...
There could be m2 slot adapters, maybe pci express but I dont know if that would work.
Yeah, that does seem like a good solution, although it may still be appealing for some not having to have additional adapter with usb wire.If anything USB Type C can handle the speeds of the Series drive with ease. Which means the best option would be an adapter that allows you to use the Series drives with a PC. That would offer a plug and play experience that Sosokrates is looking for and it means a ton of peoples PCs would already be able to support something like that. That would be the best option for consumers. Once the drives (Series Version 2 for example) exceed USB Type C speeds then it would make sense to have a different solution.
I honestly don't see Mobo manufacturers and case manufacturers modifying their designs to accommodate the slot for the Series drives.
Making NVME so small and wrapping them in cases are expensive. The ones we use in PC's today are way cheaper, faster and has more storage capacity.Its expensive? I doubt it.the mechanism and shell cant cost more then a few dollers. And people would use it because of convience and it would give more use cases for the series SSD's.
Yeah, that does seem like a good solution, although it may still be appealing for some not having to have additional adapter with usb wire.
If anything USB Type C can handle the speeds of the Series drive with ease. Which means the best option would be an adapter that allows you to use the Series drives with a PC. That would offer a plug and play experience that Sosokrates is looking for and it means a ton of peoples PCs would already be able to support something like that. That would be the best option for consumers. Once the drives (Series Version 2 for example) exceed USB Type C speeds then it would make sense to have a different solution.
I honestly don't see Mobo manufacturers and case manufacturers modifying their designs to accommodate the slot for the Series drives.
As for the series ssd, people may like the plug and play nature, and people may like having another use case for the series ssd.
If anything USB Type C can handle the speeds of the Series drive with ease. Which means the best option would be an adapter that allows you to use the Series drives with a PC. That would offer a plug and play experience that Sosokrates is looking for and it means a ton of peoples PCs would already be able to support something like that. That would be the best option for consumers. Once the drives (Series Version 2 for example) exceed USB Type C speeds then it would make sense to have a different solution.
I honestly don't see Mobo manufacturers and case manufacturers modifying their designs to accommodate the slot for the Series drives.
Here's a plug and play solution that exists on PC today, offers faster speeds than the Series expansion drives and is still cheaper:
But very few people buy that over the other solutions I outlined in a previous post.
You guys are nuts if you think PC users would have any interest in the Series expansion cards or anything like them considering all the options already available.
Here's a plug and play solution that exists on PC today, offers faster speeds than the Series expansion drives and is still cheaper:
But very few people buy that over the other solutions I outlined in a previous post.
You guys are nuts if you think PC users would have any interest in the Series expansion cards or anything like them considering all the options already available.
GHG
Not everthing is console wars.
The fact you guys take issue with a perfectly harmless query is worrying.
Having something like e-sata was but for PCI-e drives would be great--so long as they make it a standard as opposed to a closed proprietary thing (which we have plenty on our PCs anyway). We need to move beyond those crappy flash drives that never come close to their rated speeds. (I know about the enclosures, I want something small and fast).It’s an awful idea. What does putting a proprietary slot on a pc have to do with console wars?
https://eshop.sintech.cn/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=130_15&products_id=1382This is the Vita memory cards all over again. Sony made the right call to go with standard PC SSDs. Sure they're not much cheaper yet but in a couple of years price will come down quite a bit I'd imagine; not sure if the same can be said of these proprietary cards though.
Price seems nuts until you go to amazon and see how much 1-2tb ssds for pcs cost.
Price seems nuts until you go to amazon and see how much 1-2tb ssds for pcs cost.
USB ssd on series x is pretty limited in my usage. I’d rather pay the premium for the seagate crap than move things back and forth from cold storage all the time. I pretty much use the series x for next gen primarily, not old 360 and one games.
Indeed. Even traditional m2 ssd for PS5 at 2 tb size is way too expensive (fast ones that fit PS5), so paying same or more for much slower drive is even more annoying.Do you mean a 2TB NVME with specs equivalent to Series drives?
$186 vs $400
Not sure I see the similarities there. $200+ dollars is a substantial cost for convenience.
And a lot faster! Bought the SN850 1TB for my PC for $200 (Danish price). The 2TB Seagate will cost me around $600.Just bought a 2TB NVME from Teamgroup for my PS5 for $300. Still absurdly expensive but far cheaper than the $400 proprietary bullshit.
Considering the speed of the drive in comparison to those triple the spec as well, shit...We are only a few months in and This is a good example of why Open Market is always better than Proprietary.
You can get an M.2. More than fast enough for the PS5.
On Amazon you can get a M.2 1TB for $165-$200.
A 2TB M.2. For $340-$400.
Right now the 2TB SN850 black is $340
Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus 2TB is $360.
Competition drives the price down and its only going down further next year and plummet when PCIE 5.0 M.2s hit the market.
Honestly I thought the Xbox 2TB SSD would cost more, its not a terrible price but because its proprietary they cant knock the price down very much. In a couple of years Xbox is going to have a PS Vita storage situation on its hands.
This keeps getting said but there is no indication that the open market solution provides better performance nor the same flexibility with regards to installation, use and portability. The biggest knock is the price, outside of that there isn't much else to complain about. People complained that the 1TB option was almost as expensive as the XSS system. Ignoring the fact that you could use an external drive for cold storage there is now an internal storage option that is cheaper. It's hard to spin that as a negative.We are only a few months in and This is a good example of why Open Market is always better than Proprietary.
You can get an M.2. More than fast enough for the PS5.
On Amazon you can get a M.2 1TB for $165-$200.
A 2TB M.2. For $340-$400.
Right now the 2TB SN850 black is $340
Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus 2TB is $360.
Competition drives the price down and its only going down further next year and plummet when PCIE 5.0 M.2s hit the market.
Honestly I thought the Xbox 2TB SSD would cost more, its not a terrible price but because its proprietary they cant knock the price down very much. In a couple of years Xbox is going to have a PS Vita storage situation on its hands.
It could happen but I'd think anything like that would still need to be a licensed product though as I'd imagine that it used some sort of proprietary hardware/software that wouldn't allow it without a license.As I suggested in another post an adapter that uses USB 3.1 or Type C would be the best option since many people already have PCs that have them.
I'm not seeing this happening though.
It's same situation here, CZ.In Sweden the 2tb card cost more than the console.. that's f**ked up.
Holy shit man, you sure you aren't marketing?This keeps getting said but there is no indication that the open market solution provides better performance nor the same flexibility with regards to installation, use and portability.
I bought a 1TB and ate the cost at launch. Got the WD Black and heat sink (1TB) for PS5 and it was maybe 10% less. I really don't see the price premium as being as outrageous as people act. If any of them get knocked down 10%-15%, they seem like a reasonable deal.
What are the speeds on the XSX proprietary drive?Look at the speeds of the respective drives and there's your answer.
If you were able to do the same thing on the Series X as you did on the PS5 you would have paid roughly half the price of whatever you did for the PS5 drive.
The margins on these expansion drives will be insane. Considering some of the comments in this thread, I can't blame them. If I was them I'd charge more, they clearly have leeway to get away with it.
Look at the speeds of the respective drives and there's your answer.
If you were able to do the same thing on the Series X as you did on the PS5 you would have paid roughly half the price of whatever you did for the PS5 drive.
The margins on these expansion drives will be insane. Considering some of the comments in this thread, I can't blame them. If I was them I'd charge more, they clearly have leeway to get away with it.
If anything USB Type C can handle the speeds of the Series drive with ease. Which means the best option would be an adapter that allows you to use the Series drives with a PC. That would offer a plug and play experience that Sosokrates is looking for and it means a ton of peoples PCs would already be able to support something like that. That would be the best option for consumers. Once the drives (Series Version 2 for example) exceed USB Type C speeds then it would make sense to have a different solution.
I honestly don't see Mobo manufacturers and case manufacturers modifying their designs to accommodate the slot for the Series drives.
What are the speeds on the XSX proprietary drive?
So they used a Sonnet reader to test it. So... not the proprietary hardware inside the Xbox. These numbers are meaningless, since those speeds would not be sufficient to provide load times on par with the internal drive.Article/review here:
Seagate Storage Expansion Card for Xbox Series X|S Review
The Seagate Storage Expansion Card for Xbox Series X|S doubles, or more than double console capacity while maintaining performance.www.storagereview.com
I first did not locked in and after reading the damagecontrol and the what about the Vita deflection from Warnen i'am glad i put the guy on ignore a time ago, could not stand the guy and he has not change a bit.
Joke Post?This keeps getting said but there is no indication that the open market solution provides better performance nor the same flexibility with regards to installation, use and portability. The biggest knock is the price, outside of that there isn't much else to complain about. People complained that the 1TB option was almost as expensive as the XSS system. Ignoring the fact that you could use an external drive for cold storage there is now an internal storage option that is cheaper. It's hard to spin that as a negative.