• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

New Conker Live Reloaded screens!

More here!

conker-live-reloaded-20050412110137254.jpg

conker-live-reloaded-20050412110144863.jpg

conker-live-reloaded-20050412110133285.jpg
[
conker-live-reloaded-20050412110131707.jpg

conker-live-reloaded-20050412110144128.jpg

conker-live-reloaded-20050412110140957.jpg
 
I'm going to love this game long time.
 
Li Mu Bai said:
Game looks impressive, but the best looking game on the XBX? Too tall of an order to fill.

Can you point to something more visually pleasing?

Fable - No.
Dead or Alive - No.
Ninja Gaiden - No.
Jade Empire - No.
Halo 2 - No.
DOOM III - No.
Rallisport Challenge 2 - No.

I'm hoping you have something good.
 
Prine said:
Id say it ranks amoung the best looking games this gen

conker-live-reloaded-20050412110148909.jpg


Whats that? Pocket PC??

conker-live-reloaded-20050412110159924.jpg


whoa!

the hell? It was a GBASP before. Guess MS didn't like that. :lol
 
Cold-Steel said:
Can you point to something more visually pleasing?

Fable - No.
Dead or Alive - No.
Ninja Gaiden - No.
Jade Empire - No.
Halo 2 - No.
DOOM III - No.
Rallisport Challenge 2 - No.

I'm hoping you have something good.


"Ridddddddiiiiiiicccccccckkkkkkkk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
 
Chiggs said:
Ridddddddiiiiiiicccccccckkkkkkkk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That's a good pick, so is Chaos Theory but the sheer amount of effects going on in Conker is mindblowing. Rare's fully taking advantage of the tech.

Riddick = DOOM III (GFX).

Lighting is superior in DOOM though.

I'll go as far as to even say that Chaos Theory is the best looking game to *date* on the Xbox right now.
 
almokla said:
Do we really need XB2 so soon, if they can get that out of the current box ?

No, but MS has to. As much as I'd rather see 360 in 2006, I know that it's important for them to launch this year. Launching side-by-side, or after the PS3 would be suicide.
 
Cold-Steel said:
Can you point to something more visually pleasing?

Fable - No.
Dead or Alive - No.
Ninja Gaiden - No.
Jade Empire - No.
Halo 2 - No.
DOOM III - No.
Rallisport Challenge 2 - No.

I'm hoping you have something good.

I would say Riddick is arguably better looking, Lighting > *

Since I sold my XBox, I really hope that MS can somehow incorporate BC in 360. Come on MS, make it happen somehow. People say the BC doesn't matter, but when games still look this damned good on XBox, I would have absolutely NO problem playing them years from now.
 
Looks absolutley gorgeous. Hopefully MS will release this before I give in and re-play the N64 version. It's been a while. I didn't much care for how the demo played but that's an old build so no worries there.
 
Cold-Steel said:
Can you point to something more visually pleasing?

Fable - No.
Dead or Alive - No.
Ninja Gaiden - No.
Jade Empire - No.
Halo 2 - No.
DOOM III - No.
Rallisport Challenge 2 - No.

I'm hoping you have something good.

Panzer Dragon Orta
Black
SC:CT
Chronicles of Riddick:EFBB


Off of the top of my head.
 
Li Mu Bai said:
Panzer Dragon Orta
Black
SC:CT
Chronicles of Riddick:EFBB


Off of the top of my head.

Orta - No.
Black - There isn't even a video of this game out yet?!?
SC:CT - Agreed, but only to date.
Riddick - No, falls into the < DOOM III category.

Orta and CT are the best choices I've seen so far.

Conker's bloom lighting, texture work, animation, and fur shading trump everything so far.

[Edit: Have you people even played DOOM III on the Xbox? The game destroys Riddick in polygon counts AND particle effects while maintaining some form of AA enabled.]
 
Does anyone else have a problem with Conker's fur? It looks quite horrid in motion and in screen caps. Why couldn't Rare do something along the lines of SFA? Also, anybody who played the demo would probably agree it's NOT the best looking Xbox game. Far from it actually when you consider everything but the character models. I was utterly unimpressed with how marginally better it really looked over the N64 version. I know someone said "NO" to Doom 3, but in this case I'd have to say I disagree. Doom 3 looks better. It looks like a game built from the ground up for a current gen system.
 
Cold-Steel said:
Can you point to something more visually pleasing?

Fable - No.
Dead or Alive - No.
Ninja Gaiden - No.
Jade Empire - No.
Halo 2 - No.
DOOM III - No.
Rallisport Challenge 2 - No.

I'm hoping you have something good.

I dunno, Ninja Gaiden is still the most impressive looking console game in existence IMO. 60fps, high-polygon models, lots of enemies with no slowdown, huge levels, good amount of flashy effects.
 
In addition to Gaiden I would say Prime and Echoes. Running at 60fps while still maintaining equally distributed visual quality is important. Conker is very questionable in too many areas to be considered "the best" looking Xbox game. It doesn't have the complete polished package that the games previously mentioned have.
 
Since this one has not been tossed out yet, I'll be the one to say....it looks even better in motion!

And the lighting on that giant pile of shit in the other thread was sooooo good..... :lol
 
evilromero said:
Does anyone else have a problem with Conker's fur? It looks quite horrid in motion and in screen caps. Why couldn't Rare do something along the lines of SFA?

make it nothing like SFA. There was a ton of slowdown in that game.
 
Jungle Beat is the current standard for furry characters. Make it like that. I agree that it seems to be more of a "showoff" than necessary.
 
Does anyone else have a problem with Conker's fur? It looks quite horrid in motion and in screen caps. Why couldn't Rare do something along the lines of SFA?
I do. To put it simple, the fur shading in Conker sucks.

I dunno, Ninja Gaiden is still the most impressive looking console game in existence IMO. 60fps, high-polygon models, lots of enemies with no slowdown, huge levels, good amount of flashy effects.
Nope, it lacks something as simple as dynamic lighting (and now that I think about it, the dynamic objects are unaffected by most if not all of the lights in the levels...)

make it nothing like SFA. There was a ton of slowdown in that game.
Well, this game runs at half the framerate of SFA so maybe there wouldn't be a problem ;)
 
While the game overall looks really great, I'd agree with the few people that dislike the fur. there's just something about it thats off, it has a stiff, pointy, almost blurry look to me. But beyond my little gripe with the fur, I'm totally blown away by the look of the game.
 
Did anyone read the accompanying article on IGN? This game is going to be more censored (verbally speaking) than the N64 version?

Conker: Live & Reloaded is an utterly foul game. There's an unending stream of curse words from Conker and those he meets, though all of these are bleeped. Originally Microsoft had called the remade game, Conker: Live & Uncut, but wisely changed the name because this is not in any way an uncensored version of Bad Fur Day. In fact, the N64 version actually had some un-bleeped swearing. Sure, the F-bomb was always censored, but every now and then a s--- would get through, which made things even funnier. Here, Microsoft has upped the bleeps as almost nothing makes it through safely, not even "twat," which I didn't even know was considered a curse word by even the most modest of people.

(Pesonally I think twat is a fairly offensive word myself, but...). With all of the cursing that's been going on in videogames since 2001 (I mean, they are releasing GTA San Andreas, are they not?) I have no idea why they'd censor this game.

Other than that, yeah, the game looks cool for a four year old N64 port.
 
bitwise said:
why would you of all people be asking this? do you even have an xbox..


no I don't .. what I meant is in general .. we don't need next gen now ..

I think I can live with the current graphics till the end of 2006 atleast ..


after playing God of War, DMC3, RE4, and now seeing screens/footage from Zelda and conker I can clearly say that this gen is still fine, and we don't need an upgrade yet.
 
Looks bloody awesome but I'm not buying it if it's censored. Maybe I'll give it a rental

ffs I should be able to hear swear words in a game :lol
 
I played the demo that came with Jade Empire yesterday, lighting and effects are absolutely brilliant. This is definitely the best looking game on the xbox. Its also ultra violent in a cutsey sort of way...never played its predecessor so I cant compare but from what I played I was impressed.
 
almokla said:
no I don't .. what I meant is in general .. we don't need next gen now ..

I think I can live with the current graphics till the end of 2006 atleast ..


after playing God of War, DMC3, RE4, and now seeing screens/footage from Zelda and conker I can clearly say that this gen is still fine, and we don't need an upgrade yet.
Zelda? You got to be kidding, it looks like crap in its current form...
 
worldrunover said:
Did anyone read the accompanying article on IGN? This game is going to be more censored (verbally speaking) than the N64 version?



(Pesonally I think twat is a fairly offensive word myself, but...). With all of the cursing that's been going on in videogames since 2001 (I mean, they are releasing GTA San Andreas, are they not?) I have no idea why they'd censor this game.

Other than that, yeah, the game looks cool for a four year old N64 port.

Xtots are teh kiddies.
 
Xtot...lol :lol

Fair enough, twat is an offensive word especially in the UK. I don't know what it's like in the US but here in the UK, any word like that is considered pretty offensive

Still, we should be able to hear it in a bloody game. I bet it'll get a BBFC 18 over here anyway...this country's censorship sucks
 
123rl said:
Xtot...lol :lol

Fair enough, twat is an offensive word especially in the UK. I don't know what it's like in the US but here in the UK, any word like that is considered pretty offensive

Still, we should be able to hear it in a bloody game. I bet it'll get a BBFC 18 over here anyway...this country's censorship sucks

It's not used much over here, except maybe in South Park now and again (pussy is the optimal vaginal slang in the US). So really, I fail to see the big deal either way. I wonder if they censor pussy as well (I'm almost positive a few charcaters call him that in the game).
 
Pussy isn't considered offensive in the UK, but it's not really used in that context over here. If I called someone a pussy or a twat, it would mean completely different things to that person (one very offensive, the other far less offensive)

They can get away with saying pussy on TV and AFAIK it's never been censored by the BBFC in a film. Although tbh the only time I can remember hearing it is in the episode of South Park with the underpants gnomes :lol (which was rated 15 over here btw)
 
Twat is much stronger than crap (the weakest of all possible swear words) or shit or pussy or whatever. It's no cunt, but I'm not surprised, it's about on level with fuck.

In the UK anyway, or around where I live. Amusing story: I was 14 when I told my 18 year old sister and her friend what it meant, to which they reacted at horror having called people it without realising. Twats.
 
Top Bottom