There will never be sigs on GAF. Ever.Ubermatik said:^ Totally being my signature if we get them.
*N/B The above terms and regulations are subject to change without prior announcement. (c) 2011 Ubermatik LLC all rights reserved.
There will never be sigs on GAF. Ever.Ubermatik said:^ Totally being my signature if we get them.
*N/B The above terms and regulations are subject to change without prior announcement. (c) 2011 Ubermatik LLC all rights reserved.
Plywood said:There will never be sigs on GAF. Ever.
I just closed a subsidiary of echoshifting corporation and now own a fair share.echoshifting said:I've acquired blame space LLC in a hostile takeover...just to shut it down
phisheep said:If you don't have a wife - go get one.
MYeager said:I also agree with the poster that said that this seems like a way for Kotaku to generate content without actually paying someone for freelance work. Given they have employees who are also writers, it does seem odd that instead of coming up with original conent or contracted content that they have an agreement to get content from a different message board. As far as NeoGAF goes it seems like a good way of promoting and extending the influence of the site.
Anyone could copy-paste publicly the PMs you send them.Brettison said:Only portion that made me scratch my head is why PMs are included in this since they are well PMs.
And more work for divorce lawyers.charlequin said:Sound legal advice as always.
NeoGAF isn't an imagehost.Brettison said:PS: I am confused on something a mod a few pages back said about how all the images here aren't really here, but hosted through someone else and linked back to GAF? How does this work exactly, and what does that mean?
FStop7 said:"He" who? Evilore? Are you really saying Evilore is a renegade millionaire?
Nah, I'm not mad. As was discussed over on the Gaming Discussion equivalent of this thread, this is hardly different from how every other public forum on the Internet operates. Hell, half of the time websites steal from each other and quote forum posts without linking back to the original thread or crediting anyone. At least Kotaku asked EviLore for permission first and gave me a byline with a direct link to the actual thread. I think it's a good thing for NeoGAF discussions to get that extra exposure.LiK said:Are you mad about this? People are certainly concerned but it was your thread that was chosen.
Yeah, in this case they didn't, but he was fine with it and if, in the future, they do ask for permission, it's no longer an issue, right? I mean, you can't do anything in most cases if some obscure website takes your post from GAF and uses that to get hits (after crediting of course).Beam said:But they did not ask the thread creator.
crowphoenix said:Well, fuck no. I participated in the creative writing threads. That work is mine. I will remove it from NeoGaf this instant. And I will never post or link to another thing I do.
This shit is fucking scummy, and the fact that it was just slipped in is ridiculous. Whoever decided this should be ashamed of themselves.
slidewinder said:Actually, "such submissions" doesn't even have a clear referent at the moment. Looks like the "By registering an account at NeoGAF.com and participating (including but not limited to submitting replies or private messages)" was grafted badly to the boilerplate following; "such submissions" in the boilerplate looks like it's meant to connect back to where we've got "participating (including..." now.
crowphoenix said:Well, fuck no. I participated in the creative writing threads. That work is mine. I will remove it from NeoGaf this instant. And I will never post or link to another thing I do.
This shit is fucking scummy, and the fact that it was just slipped in is ridiculous. Whoever decided this should be ashamed of themselves.
This thread is now about the search update in a few days :OEviLore said:I don't think the current version of the forum software supports that, actually, or I would have. When we update to the newer software in a few days, in order to get full search back and other features, I can go ahead and do that if it'll clarify things for people.
Lyphen said:NeoGAF isn't an imagehost.
ScOULaris said:Nah, I'm not mad. As was discussed over on the Gaming Discussion equivalent of this thread, this is hardly different from how every other public forum on the Internet operates. Hell, half of the time websites steal from each other and quote forum posts without linking back to the original thread or crediting anyone. At least Kotaku asked EviLore for permission first and gave me a byline with a direct link to the actual thread. I think it's a good thing for NeoGAF discussions to get that extra exposure.
Face it. When you post something on a public forum, you're essentially making it public domain. When you click that "Submit" button, you're already publishing your writing and/or pictures for all to see freely. If a high-profile website highlights your post, gives you credit, and makes no attempt to pass it off as their own writing, then I don't see what the problem is.
We don't own the words that we post to this forum, just like we give up ownership of videos that we post to YouTube and pictures we post to Facebook. That's how the Internet has worked for a very long time.
I do understand that it gets a little iffy when Kotaku is making ad money off of clicks to my writing, but that's a gray area inherent with blogging and referencing other websites. When I made that thread, I did so with no intention of profiting from it. I think Kotaku Asks is decent idea, and it does nothing but attract positive attention toward our discussions.
The only thing that could have been handled better in this situation would be for Crecente to have asked me for permission or at least notified me using my thread. By no means did he have to, but it would have been in good practice.
enzo_gt said:This thread is now about the search update in a few days :O
I haven't seen EviLore answer why this applies to PMs though, so I would like to see him answer that. Seems strange.
EviLore said:If you haven't noticed, NeoGAF is basically the largest general interest english language video game forum anymore that isn't owned by some huge corporation. And the rest are owned by huge corporations because giant sacks of money get offered to the owners. And I've been offered giant sacks of money too. Giant. Sacks. I keep the monetization minimalist though and I haven't sold out because... well, draw your own conclusions.
But if you guys hate me and don't want me running the site, let me know, I've always wanted my own tropical island! Just kidding, don't take that as a veiled threat to lockstep, if gaffers are anything they're vocal and fierce and independent, which makes you all a pain in the ass but not something I can be too aggravated about.
Probably just more people reading the initial post, then posting in reaction to it rather than reading on.FStop7 said:Holy shit, how is this still escalating? Everything was clearly laid out by page 3.
I'm not sure how scummy it is, lots of forum have similar clauses in their TOS to cover their ass so that they can function (without something like it, EvilLore would technically have to get my permission to so much as display this post.) But I think frequent posters in the various creative threads might have a point, if they ever go to sell one of their works, the buyer might demand an exclusive license, which, having granted NeoGAF a non-exclusive, irrevocable license, they wouldn't be able to. This came up with that Reddit thread that spawned a movie deal for the author.crowphoenix said:Well, fuck no. I participated in the creative writing threads. That work is mine. I will remove it from NeoGaf this instant. And I will never post or link to another thing I do.
Don't you understand? When you post a piece of creative writing on an Internet forum that is open for everyone to view, someone can always copy/paste and pass of your work as their own. Assigning license to GAF to redistribute our posts does not mean that EviLore is gonna start selling off your writing and profiting from it. The TOS amendment doesn't even allow him to do that. The writing still belongs to you, but by "publishing" it on this site, you are giving GAF license to send it elsewhere. There is no cause for alarm here.crowphoenix said:Well, fuck no. I participated in the creative writing threads. That work is mine. I will remove it from NeoGaf this instant. And I will never post or link to another thing I do.
This shit is fucking scummy, and the fact that it was just slipped in is ridiculous. Whoever decided this should be ashamed of themselves.
Believe me. I knew that risk. What I cannot abide is the unhanded way this was done. I knew someone could steal my work. And honestly, it's not work worth stealing.Corto said:I understand your reaction and I would react all the same believe me. But you should take this as a warning. Everything that you post in a public forum is fair game to whoever chooses to take it.
ha I knew it!EviLore said:If you haven't noticed, NeoGAF is basically the largest general interest english language video game forum anymore that isn't owned by some huge corporation. And the rest are owned by huge corporations because giant sacks of money get offered to the owners. And I've been offered giant sacks of money too. Giant. Sacks. I keep the monetization minimalist though and I haven't sold out because... well, draw your own conclusions.
But if you guys hate me and don't want me running the site, let me know, I've always wanted my own tropical island! Just kidding, don't take that as a veiled threat to lockstep, if gaffers are anything they're vocal and fierce and independent, which makes you all a pain in the ass but not something I can be too aggravated about.
RubxQub said:GAF is going to make trillions off of this guy's inventions now. I don't think that's right!
GAF branded SniperKnives in every department store in America. I can see it already.
crowphoenix said:Believe me. I knew that risk. What I cannot abide is the unhanded way this was done. I knew someone could steal my work. And honestly, it's not work worth stealing.
But, for NeoGaf to all of a sudden decide it owns my work? Fuck no.
The mistake is my own. And it is not one I will make again.
Walk away from the computer and take a breather. Then, come back and understand that isn't what's happening.crowphoenix said:Believe me. I knew that risk. What I cannot abide is the unhanded way this was done. I knew someone could steal my work. And honestly, it's not work worth stealing.
But, for NeoGaf to all of a sudden decide it owns my work? Fuck no.
The mistake is my own. And it is not one I will make again.
Heavy said:ha I knew it!
Any guesses on how much he was offered? It had to be in the millions... man you'd have to be either crazy or a saint to turn that down because who knows how long a gaming forum will last? Or maybe the gaming industry totally crashes or the hardcore market dries up completely and traffic takes a significant dip... there's so many variables at work. But if he sold it for the (presumably) millions he was offered he could've retired and never had to worry about money again. I find this stuff fascinating...
crowphoenix said:Well, fuck no. I participated in the creative writing threads. That work is mine.
Ubermatik said:Evilore, buy the tropical island, and call it GAF-land. We'll all live in horrific filth and discomfort.
Jin34 said:Gaf is like the Playstation, remove features and and make shady TOS changes.