Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD

Status
Not open for further replies.
No just calling out the obvious sony fanboys who said id be quiet. Orisis Black is bullshit , so is Klee. I told you all in June when you were dancing, xbox would be most powerful. Dont be mad because im looking right and the piece of plastic you pine for looks weaker.

What makes you so confident klee is incorrect?
He does have industry ties.
I doubt Somone would be so confident and lay it all out if it was just bullshit.
 
What makes you so confident klee is incorrect?
He does have industry ties.
I doubt Somone would be so confident and lay it all out if it was just bullshit.

He's not saying the things he likes. Otherwise he would be on Klee side and saying how credible he is. Same with Osiris.
 
Last edited:
He's not saying the things he likes. Otherwise he would be on Klee side and saying how credible he is. Same with Osiris.
What gives Timdog away is that he is immediately dismissive and then, claims he has inside information. And when he tries to come off as credible, he ends up making a "My uncle works for Nintendo" post on steroids and crack.
 
Isn't 9.2TF RDNA close to 12TF GCN?
I would gladly accept 9.2TF RDNA with a better HW Ray Tracing implementation (YottaRays/s 😅). Here's hoping.
As long as Sony have WWS I'll probably keep on team blue. XBox doesn't make sense for me. It doesn't have exclusives and PC is more powerful although more expensive.
 
I just scanned through 4 pages of posts, wow, very deja vu . PS5 is faster (not sure why this is so implausible to some), that's what the insiders say, the reveals should lay everything out.

It is a bit odd that MS has a second chip, but so little info exists about the other console. Must really be guarding that with their life. LOL

Faster could be referring to GPU clockspeed. In all the data leaks so far PS5's GPU is consistently clocked higher out of the two. Assuming the chip architecture and size stays roughly the same, faster GPU clock should hold.
 
Ps4 die is smaller than x1 die yet it is 45% more powerful . Just saying
45%? Huh?
Same CPU.
And 7850 vs something between 7850 and 7870 as GPU.
And the gap between the two was like 10-15%:

perfrel.gif
 
I hope not; why would a Lockhart chip need to be tested for PS4 and PS4 Pro clock speeds?
I dunno - could be some misinformation in there .. but people seem to be back on the "PS5 is a litttle more powerful" thing - and there's no way in hell a 36CU part is goinf to outperform the ~400mm2 die we've seen from Scarlet..

..But I don't think Klee is fake etc .. all the sources don't line up though
 
45%? Huh?
Same CPU.
And 7850 vs something between 7850 and 7870 as GPU.
And the gap between the two was like 10-15%:

perfrel.gif
The PS4 had somewhere around a 39% TF advantage over the XB1. On top of that, it used GDDR5 which has higher bandwidth than the XB1's DDR3 RAM and the miniscule 32 MB of esRAM was a bottleneck. The PS4 also had twice the ROPs and far more GPGPU compute units.
 
So do people thing the 36 CU Oberon part was Lockhart now ?
I believe this is the correct answer (posted at reeee):

My theory was that Sony didn't have anything substantial to work on otherwise, hence the "waiting for big Navi" part.

More "evidence" points to PS5 being on big Navi, and with the knowledge PS5 had dev kits out far longer than Xbox, and Xbox only started sending theirs out in mid November, that could point to Sony using currently available AMD tech back in early 2019 for dev purposes, while Xbox waited for big Navi to be available.

The Oberon chip wouldn't be just for BC, it would to get dev kits out early while Sony waits for AMD on big Navi.

AMD not being able to deliver the specs on the timeline Sony wanted is pretty believable to me.
 
45%? Huh?
Same CPU.
And 7850 vs something between 7850 and 7870 as GPU.
And the gap between the two was like 10-15%:

perfrel.gif
Xbox One is more like HD 7770 than 7850 lol
HD 7850 is close to PS4.

I see 60% to 87% for these... that means 45% difference.

Of course these cards are not exactly the same on PS4/XB1 but it is the most close in terms of TFs.

You cant just compare pc parts like that to one vs ps4. CU count difference is big and makes it to be around 40-45%
He tried to fool us.
He used a 2.56 TFs vs 1.76 TFs card.
 
Last edited:
The Klee guy said he had spec sheets, but don't know if this is final silicon (he refuses to say more) - if he had dev kit specs then it could explain a lot ..
 
45%? Huh?
Same CPU.
And 7850 vs something between 7850 and 7870 as GPU.
And the gap between the two was like 10-15%:

perfrel.gif
You do know those consoles' specs have already been revealed, like over 7 years ago?
1.84 vs 1.31 (after XB1 upclock) is like 28%. Original XB1 clockspeed 1.84 vs. 1.23 = 33%. While not 45%, still much more than 10-15%.
 
You do know those consoles' specs have already been revealed, like over 7 years ago?
1.84 vs 1.31 (after XB1 upclock) is like 28%. Original XB1 clockspeed 1.84 vs. 1.23 = 33%. While not 45%, still much more than 10-15%.
Actually the jump from 1.31 to 1.84 is 40%.
1.23 to 1.84 is 49%.

Depending of what you are basing...

1.84 is 40% more than 1.31.
1.31 is 33% less than 1.84.
 
Last edited:
And just like that...klee is gone. Lol, I'm going to laugh when the consoles launch and the xsx is noticeably more powerful than the ps5. I'm still calling bs on all of his "insider" info.
 
Last edited:
The Klee guy said he had spec sheets, but don't know if this is final silicon (he refuses to say more) - if he had dev kit specs then it could explain a lot ..

One thing to note is that having "final spec list" is not a guarantee they will represent the retail products (which klee has already said)
It's all depends how Conservative or aggressive each company was when coming up with these targeted specs.
I think Ms will have some wiggle room with clocks because there tower design will allow this, the question is have Sony gone for an equally efficient cooling system or even more efficient.
 
Interesting that he asked for a permaban. If he was legitimate, or believed in his 'sources', you would think he'd want to stick around to get the fanboy addulation ih he was proved right. Very telling.
 
Interesting that he asked for a permaban. If he was legitimate, or believed in his 'sources', you would think he'd want to stick around to get the fanboy addulation ih he was proved right. Very telling.

Read his post. He didn't want all the attention and regretted saying anything due to it all.
 
Last edited:
Interesting that he asked for a permaban. If he was legitimate, or believed in his 'sources', you would think he'd want to stick around to get the fanboy addulation ih he was proved right. Very telling.
The community is really toxic against him... I saw some Xbox fans replies to him there and it was not polite in any way.
 
Interesting that he asked for a permaban. If he was legitimate, or believed in his 'sources', you would think he'd want to stick around to get the fanboy addulation ih he was proved right. Very telling.

He's been harrassed for months now. Ever since he said PS5 had a slight advantage over anaconda, the people on the xbox camp that liked him, started to call him a liar.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom