OK, what did you mean by this?!?!?!?!?!
PLEASE we all want this torment to end!![]()
it was a tweet from Benji about sony earnings.deleted, what was it?
To be expected. It's end of the the generation. And Nintendo is killing it!
Yep. It's probably 10.25tf.
![]()
Where did you see that ?Very interesting, talk about a maximum of 13.8 TFLOPS for PS5, this is the maximum data that can be expected. He also comments that for PS6 to show the games at 8k, a minimum of 29.44 TFLOPS is required. This is the best article to date, thanks.
What about the very accurate GAF """insiders"""?
Is this from the Sony Q&A?Pricing for next gen will be to maintain profitability over the life of the product.
Where did you see that ?
Apparently this is a speculation article ?? No ? It's not based on actual information. Is it ?There are 5 pages, on pages 4 and 5, it is a very complete article, the best one to date that gives us a real idea of what to expect.
I would copy it to you but I have translated it into Spanish.
13.8
I want to get off now... You boys and your reading into things. Though it wouldn't surprise me if Sony do come out and say something utterly insane. Remember when they said the PS3 was 2tf
Edit: you know this article isn't official right? It says right there on page one "the only official specs we have are..." The rest are tales from their arse. It's a speculation piece, and it talks about theoretical limits and numbers. Nothing in that whole thing is legit conformation, other than the bare few lines at the start.
Guys come on, use a LITTLE common sense.
13.8![]()
The article say it's between 7.8 to 13.8 tf13.8
I want to get off now... You boys and your reading into things. Though it wouldn't surprise me if Sony do come out and say something utterly insane. Remember when they said the PS3 was 2tf
Edit: you know this article isn't official right? It says right there on page one "the only official specs we have are..." The rest are tales from their arse. It's a speculation piece, and it talks about theoretical limits and numbers. Nothing in that whole thing is legit conformation, other than the bare few lines at the start.
Guys come on, use a LITTLE common sense.
13.8![]()
It is the maximum we can expect, the minimum says it is 7.36TFLOPS
Yes. A translation of the answers to investors questions.Is this from the Sony Q&A?
If so, sold at a loss, overall profit due to services and games.
13.8
I want to get off now... You boys and your reading into things. Though it wouldn't surprise me if Sony do come out and say something utterly insane. Remember when they said the PS3 was 2tf
Edit: you know this article isn't official right? It says right there on page one "the only official specs we have are..." The rest are tales from their arse. It's a speculation piece, and it talks about theoretical limits and numbers. Nothing in that whole thing is legit conformation, other than the bare few lines at the start.
Guys come on, use a LITTLE common sense.
13.8![]()
This weeks euro lottery is 32 million, and if I enter that's the most I can win. It doesn't mean I will.
Please don't look at the clouds and see Elvis, it's bad for your health![]()
But that's their speculation and not based on actual info. We need to wait for more concrete infoYou forget something very important, you are talking about a PS5 of 36CU when it informs that the minimum we can expect is 50CU
You forget something very important, you are talking about a PS5 of 36CU when it informs that the minimum we can expect is 50CU
It does not matter that it is not official, it is based on real data to calculate the theoretical maximums and minimums that we can expect.
It does not matter that it is not official, it is based on real data to calculate the theoretical maximums and minimums that we can expect.
Based on real data, but that data is insignificant and incomplete. It would be like me saying "I'm going to have sex with this hot blonde that kept looking at me when I was at the shop", and my actual solid data consists of "she looked in my general direction. Once."
If you're going off data like this, that just leaves most people back to the 9 vs 12 talk. And that's just stupid at this point, because nobody knows.
The data we have is so incomplete, you can't accurately make any sort of viable, decent guess. Plus the data we have is from several different places and is several different things.
Don't do this to yourself man, or worse don't do it to others. There are a lot of members of Gaf, and the internet at large, who will put 2 and 2 together and get 5. They will read this as gospel, when in fact... it's just as much a guess as anybody else in this thread.
If you want hard facts? Wait for Sony and MS. But even THEN assume some of what they will say will be spin and not real.
13.8
I want to get off now... You boys and your reading into things. Though it wouldn't surprise me if Sony do come out and say something utterly insane. Remember when they said the PS3 was 2tf
Edit: you know this article isn't official right? It says right there on page one "the only official specs we have are..." The rest are tales from their arse. It's a speculation piece, and it talks about theoretical limits and numbers. Nothing in that whole thing is legit conformation, other than the bare few lines at the start.
Guys come on, use a LITTLE common sense.
13.8![]()
I'm pretty sure Tommy is OK to poke fun at, I mean with him refusing verification and all.Bro if you're on parole cut this shit out already
Based on real data, but that data is insignificant and incomplete. It would be like me saying "I'm going to have sex with this hot blonde that kept looking at me when I was at the shop", and my actual solid data consists of "she looked in my general direction. Once."
If you're going off data like this, that just leaves most people back to the 9 vs 12 talk. And that's just stupid at this point, because nobody knows.
The data we have is so incomplete, you can't accurately make any sort of viable, decent guess. Plus the data we have is from several different places and is several different things.
Don't do this to yourself man, or worse don't do it to others. There are a lot of members of Gaf, and the internet at large, who will put 2 and 2 together and get 5. They will read this as gospel, when in fact... it's just as much a guess as anybody else in this thread.
If you want hard facts? Wait for Sony and MS. But even THEN assume some of what they will say will be spin and not real.
I'm pretty sure Tommy is OK to poke fun at, I mean with him refusing verification and all.
Hey guys, stop speculating on a speculation thread, people might believe it, what?
People can and should speculate whatever they want, as long as they are being respectful. Other people believing anything that comes out of it is on them.
Don't do this to yourself man... Think logically.
I didn't say "don't speculate" you titbut he did say this was actual hard info on the specs of the ps5. Thats not speculation, that's just flat out wrong
![]()
Sony on the investors Q&A "while they cant talk much on their PS5 plan right now, the timing they will is "comparable to the past"
You have a hard time understanding the difference between here say and evidence. There is a reason here say isn't allowed in court, it's unreliable.
Is it? where is your hard data saying he is wrong? Oh you dont it have cuz everyone is speculating.
If comparable to the past then they are already late.
If something is speculation, we treat it as such. For example nobody has said digital foundry has hard facts about the SX performance, they have made educated guesses. That's absolutely fine, and the bread and butter of this thread, but still, people dog piled on them.
This article, wherever the heck it's from, is doing the same thing - speculating. It's talking about theoretical limits on the silicone that are possible, it doesn't mean likely or will happen.
So when you pop your head up and say:
" You forget something very important, you are talking about a PS5 of 36CU when it informs that the minimum we can expect is 50CU"
You are not presenting this as speciation, but as fact. He's saying the minimum to expect is 50cus, when in reality the minimum we can expect is 0, because we have no real idea of anything.
This is equal to saying the next Xbox will be most powerful because of the size of the console, but not seeing the spec sheet. It's ok to make those guesses, but treat them such - guesses.
And I'm all for open discussion about guesses and speciation, I've done a fair whack of it myself.