hard for me to see as I'm still on phone but isn't that the same grill mesh as F7 model ?I don't know what it is, but Driveclub has it too on the same location. So it must be on some models, can't be just luck that 2 different studio's put a hole in the same place.
Yes it is, they look very close to each other.
So maybe the the mesh is correct after all, just a revision/different version
it could be, but im not sure. Maybe a early production model or something like that.
They may use the same supplied model. I've only ever seen it in games. GTA4 mod has it too. If you look at the official video you see that thier 3D render has it but the actual car they produced in the same unvieling video doesn't:
Not really. GTA5 races has some resemblance simply because it's rockstar but there isn't one I would call equivalent to MIdnight Club 3.
sounds plausible
I don't know what it is, but Driveclub has it too on the same location. So it must be on some models, can't be just luck that 2 different studio's put a hole in the same place.
So Forza 7 on pc looks identical to Xbox One S since they both run 1080p right? lol. 1080P vs 1800CB will not make the car model better. Infact the 1080P looks better than the 1800CB mode because it enables motion blur and backfire. Also my last shots where in 1800Cb so stop crying. The only campaign i have is against blind fanboys like you. You post standard Xbox One footage and try to compare it with the Pro and with no shame you call me for cherry picking.
It doesn't mean its the same model, they have modeld for The Crew 2 too but its a different model. The Laferrari was sinds 2013 in Forza, Driveclub had the Lafferrari sinds 2015.two differents studios? no the cars models are made by the same Vietnamese studio for both games
http://www.glassegg.com/portfolio/
Driveclub ingame car model is really high quality probably the second best, because its using a slightly lower lod wich is really hard to notice. But some of the interior shaders are really starting to look a bit dated compared to Forza and GTS. But still amazing in game car quality.
Holy shit. This comment takes the cake.
Yeah hide the second video and the other shit you postedIn 1800p the IQ is a lot better... stop lying
motogamestv videos of FM7 are from oneX
stop lying - combo x2
FM7 real livery resolution on a standard xbox one.....
Look how stupid you look with all this shit you post, grown the fuck up.
We have a winner!Some quick gifs
It was a good looking game but had way too many flaws imo. Even downsampled it doesnt stand out tbh.
Its flaws where road reflection and no headlight shadows, outside that it has everything best in game car model, best shadows, highest draw distance, highly detailed environment, one of the best lighting, incredible sky, high quality textures, texture filtering, high quality reflections, high quality shaders, full 100+ 3d crowd, high quality particles, dynamic TOD and weather and top that its open world. There is no game close to this with the overal package. Every game does one or 2 things good, but this game does almost everything good outside the 2 things i mentioned. Now in FH4 they added headlight shadows and higher quality road reflections.
I know what you tryna say, but in Driveclub everything gets hiden by the motion blur and camera shake. Thats not a bad thing cuz it gives a amazing sense of speed and makes it look real. But when you compare the 2 side by side, Forza is the better looking game. The technical short comings of Driveclub is really too much to overlook when you compare it with Forza. Its still has the best weather system to date. But other than that Forza really looks better, like for the shaders i don't agree. Driveclub interior shaders look really outdated for the most part. The one's with a carbon interior can look nice because of the self reflection, but materials like leather, alcantra and wood and such don't look better than Forza. Lighting looks good but is too dark most of the time, its like filming with a non hdr phone camera. In both games you have time of day and lighting scenarios that make them look real. Also there are some serious problems with pop ins and draw distance, alot of things pop up like 10m from you. In FH pop up is not that much better but its a open world game where you see alot further then Driveclub and you can go anywhere. But like you said, if Driveclub was on PC with full support. Gaddamn that would melt eyes, like 4K 60fps with 16xAF, better textures, better draw distance, higher quality shadows and higher quality particles. But still you can't call Driveclub ugly, just not the best looking racing game anymore.
Yeah most likely, maybe 1440p downsampled if they lower it to Xbox One settings.
I know what you tryna say, but in Driveclub everything gets hiden by the motion blur and camera shake. Thats not a bad thing cuz it gives a amazing sense of speed and makes it look real. But when you compare the 2 side by side, Forza is the better looking game. The technical short comings of Driveclub is really too much to overlook when you compare it with Forza. Its still has the best weather system to date. But other than that Forza really looks better, like for the shaders i don't agree. Driveclub interior shaders look really outdated for the most part. The one's with a carbon interior can look nice because of the self reflection, but materials like leather, alcantra and wood and such don't look better than Forza. Lighting looks good but is too dark most of the time, its like filming with a non hdr phone camera. In both games you have time of day and lighting scenarios that make them look real. Also there are some serious problems with pop ins and draw distance, alot of things pop up like 10m from you. In FH pop up is not that much better but its a open world game where you see alot further then Driveclub and you can go anywhere. But like you said, if Driveclub was on PC with full support. Gaddamn that would melt eyes, like 4K 60fps with 16xAF, better textures, better draw distance, higher quality shadows and higher quality particles. But still you can't call Driveclub ugly, just not the best looking racing game anymore.
I still play it on my projector, and despite being obviously surpassed by other games in resolution or framerate (or both), it still manages to look absolutely stunning.
It can look good, but when you stop or when you look around alot of the thing are low res. The motion blur hides alot, plus the lighting system is really dark. Even in mid sunny clear day the game has some really dark spots in the interior. Its like the constrast of the black levels are upped 2 or 3 levels. But still it has its moments in motion plus with rain its still looks good. Wish they support the Pro with 1800P CB, 16xAF, better shadows and draw distance or 60fps.
Phil Spencer said something about Playground using their open-world "expertise" on other projects soon. We'll see.
Great contribution to the thread.
http://www.gamersyde.com/hqstream_driveclub_japan_race_2-33907_en.html
Clearly this is low-res and still looks shit, right? The game is just phenomenal in motion, still has the highest highs but also some of the lowest lows (low AF, some low res textures etc).
Shaders are not even comparable in FH3. I mean the polygons are there and the models look good, but a high polygoncount alone doesn't make a great looking car.
They look good though, but with the the lighting and the shaders from Driveclub it would look twice as good.
The tail lights often give it away in FH3. Please keep in mind, that I picked those pictures on purpose. There are cars where it isn't such a problem, the P1 for example looks great. The Alpha is also not bad.
You have the huge power advantage here, I mean I have an 8700k @5,2GHz and a 1080, but you can't bruteforce better shaders and lighting.
Settings are all Ultra, Motion Blur off and MSAA 4x.
