I've always just hit PrintScreen and saved the image in photoshop, I always have it open and it takes about 20 seconds before it's loaded to an image host and ready to post. I have a riser over the button so I can easily smash it while playing incase something looks cool but I can't pause the game to take a shot.
Lolhey now, you started it!
“Well yeah but I bet it won’t do well I’m reviews...”hey now, you started it!
And can't you see why this was never something done in this thread and why it isn't working. This thread got lots of discussions by Foliage vs Foliage shots, Lighting vs Lighting shots, Cars vs Cars shots, materials, textures, shadows, reflections, DD, LOD, pits vs shots or vids....This is what generates discussion, just like DF's and SuperGT's videos showing the differences between Forza 7 vs GTS.....It's a versus thread in that light....I'm sure you can post these random long shots without context or comparison in the PC or Forza thread, but here it merits and drives no discussion for the topic at hand...What are you showing here graphically, how does it compare to other games. You can't post random shots and ask people to make an argument around it, it just does not makes sense....
I spoke of reviews only in context of graphics, how it looks, elements and features like running through a brick wall with an exotic car, does not look good for immersion or make this game look better in motion...As you can see, "I said" that I don't think the game looks particularly better than Horizon 3. And apart from the brick walls, there's a very aggressive lod which draws just in front of your car, distant detail looks very flat in certain scenes....hey now, you started it!
Here you go mate, my old FH3 shots. FH4 will look even better with the new lighting and shaders.
From what I can tell Gran Turismo Sport doesn't have any type of AA.
Here you go mate, my old FH3 shots. FH4 will look even better with the new lighting and shaders.
From the outside view each shot is 5 min apart
Here you go mate, my old FH3 shots. FH4 will look even better with the new lighting and shaders.
From the outside view each shot is 5 min apart
so coolI've always just hit PrintScreen and saved the image in photoshop, I always have it open and it takes about 20 seconds before it's loaded to an image host and ready to post. I have a riser over the button so I can easily smash it while playing incase something looks cool but I can't pause the game to take a shot.
Forza Horizon 3 (x-posted from PC screenshot thread, but I really like them)
Ok then....so lets go back to proper comparation pics
Nordschleife
Monza
Some car models ( no scapes, gameplay models)
Some comparison pics of GTS between gameplay/replay/photomode as requested on the last page. It's a pain in the ass trying to line these up in photomode as the FOV is different but it's good enough. There are some really minor improvements in photomode over gameplay but it's more or less like for like.
Once again these were captured on the PS4 Pro at Willow Springs, capture method was the PS share button.
Gameplay
Replay
Photomode
Gameplay
Replay
Photomode
Gameplay
Replay
Photomode
Because its baked, only the sky and lighting changes unfortunately. Its still better than static TOD to be honestSimilar shots from a similar style location at a similar time of day, FM7 at max settings looks almost identical to Horizon 3 but despite being released a year later it has a lower IQ than FH3. Everything is more sterile and hard-edged, and the colors are so much more muted, almost reminiscent of FM3. Annoying things like the baked shadows not following the scripted sunset though the race pull you out of the scene. In instances entire objects don't cast any shadows at all. The early part of the Rio Track (where the colored flags cover the track) has this issue, the sun disappears behind a high-rise building right in front of you and your car is still sitting in direct sunlight. The building directly beside it does cast a shadow blocking the sun from reaching the car though. It's like a guy at T10 started making the shadows, then stopped for lunch and never came back. I can understand in a game like Horizon not having shadows cast by every patch of grass but an entire giant building directly off the track? Come on...
.Even that is not the gameplay model in GTS, as soon as you enter photomode the lod swaps.Ok then....so lets go back to proper comparation pics
Nordschleife
Monza
Some car models ( no scapes, gameplay models)
Forza 7 is no ugly game, yes it has flaws like unpredictable lighting that whe can't set wich can look off with the static shadows. But shaders, car models, refelctions, draw distance, iq, weather effects, textures and track details are still one of the best. And the lighting on some tracks are GTS level like Dubai circuit and tracks with rain. The reasons why FH series look much better is 30fps vs 60fps base target, wich gives Horizon double the power to work with.
On a track like that you can't see a much of a difference with a lighting like that. If you go to a track with trees and hills with lots of object in sunny tod, then you see alot of a difference. I did alot of testing with that, the things that change in photomode are relfections, car model, texture filtering, draw distance, shadows, iq and some track details(like extra foliage). the lighting and shaders are the same, and the interior is the same to in gameplay(interiro view) vs photomode. It only changes during scape mode or loading screen at the car select menu. But still GTS lighting and shaders are still one of the best if not the best. And here is a example of the difference in photomode vs gameplaySome comparison pics of GTS between gameplay/replay/photomode as requested on the last page. It's a pain in the ass trying to line these up in photomode as the FOV is different but it's good enough. There are some really minor improvements in photomode over gameplay but it's more or less like for like.
Once again these were captured on the PS4 Pro at Willow Springs, capture method was the PS share button.
Gameplay
Replay
Photomode
Gameplay
Replay
Photomode
Gameplay
Replay
Photomode
Yes, it looks really good. The rain in this game is still the best looking rain ever, even after FH4 launch. The foliage, car models and the lighting are also impressive for a 4 year old title, still holds. But it has some big downs like the bad iq, lowest AF ever, draw distance and shaders. there are some good looking shaders but most of them doesn't look as good as GTS or Forza.
.
Yeah he is the only one liking his stuff, and he seems salty. Looking at his history shows clearly that he is here not for a proper comparisons but just trolling.
Ow yeah since you and your friend post all gameplay shots you know the scape mode shots that you call gameplay. Stop trolling and come with a proper argument or discussion.
Oh well, your best friend in general is a famous troll at Japanese 4chan
Ok then....so lets go back to proper comparation pics
Nordschleife
Monza
Some car models ( no scapes, gameplay models)
The last shot is the photomode camera with the UI turned off, I couldn't get a straight on shot without it, the rest are in-game. These are all off the PC version, but as far as I'm aware the X1X version will share all the assets and textures
Yes you are lying because if you have a pro you would know it takes 4k PNG screenshots, and i didn't upscale anything. the game runs 1800p CB ofcourse its gonna have lower iq than Forza(4K 8xMSAA) on pc. And whats wrong with 4K screenshots, its the highest quality screenshot you can get on PS so why are you crying. If i had a 4K monitor on my pc i would post 4K screenshots of Forza too wich would make it even look better than my shots, but then you would cry even harder that its 4K 2000$ pc vs vs 1800cb on pro. You are trying too hard, just stop.
Some comparison pics of GTS between gameplay/replay/photomode as requested on the last page. It's a pain in the ass trying to line these up in photomode as the FOV is different but it's good enough. There are some really minor improvements in photomode over gameplay but it's more or less like for like.
Once again these were captured on the PS4 Pro at Willow Springs, capture method was the PS share button.
Gameplay
Photomode
I think the original looks better.These desert shots really show the difference between GTS and FM7s lighting. For starters it's impossible to have the sun in the middle of the sky, it's always late afternoon apparently. GTS is entirely more natural looking with softer gleam off shiny objects and more of the brown tone of the surrounding area saturating the objects in the image. The tail lights in FM7 almost come out as a shade of brown too. Shots like these highlight a lack of attention to detail in FM7 as well, reflectors on the cars don't reflect, the reverse light is a fuzzy texture that almost looks like they added it last moment (It is a modeled lens over a light source, it's just an ugly one) and for some unknown reason when the lights are on the smoked black tail light plastic turns a brighter red than the part that actually lights up on the real car. It also shows there is a big difference from track to track in GTS, some are pretty rough, some are excellent like Willow Springs. You can always tell where Polyphony spends their time and where they don't. You can tell that T10 needs to spend more time across the board. Forza's tracks are pretty consistent, and look good while moving, but the detail drop for the added weather effects, dynamic skybox and night racing really hurts the details off-track. The strange things that seem to have been forgotten during development are often puzzling.
Photomode, then I opened it in photoshop and clicked "auto levels" I wish I could use that button on the whole game.
same TODOk then....so lets go back to proper comparation pics
Nordschleife
Monza
Some car models ( no scapes, gameplay models)
Thank you kindly for the advice!
