I like the Texans, Jags, Rams and Raiders. Green Bay should show a sexy woman packing her purse.
Chargers are electricity not a horse ever.
That Giants logo if fugly and overcomplicated. Some of them are nice, though. I like the Bengals, Rams and Titans the most I think.
My god the Eagles one is terrible.
Wonder if Carolina gets rid one of their running backs to Irsay
That Giants logo if fugly and overcomplicated. Some of them are nice, though. I like the Bengals, Rams and Titans the most I think.
Not really. He does like it more than the traditional QB rating, though:Isn't Burke and AS huge QBR proponents? I've never seen a TV broadcast use anything but passer rating, even ESPN uses both.
QBR is a mix of other measures. At its core, it basically combines EPA, WPA, and Air Yards. Suppose quarterback Farley and quarterback Andrews both have a QBR of 60. Say Farley got his 60 because of very high EPA but low WPA in high leverage situations (like Philip Rivers last year), and Andrews got his 60 QBR with lower EPA but high WPA in high leverage situations (like Matt Ryan last year).
I'd prefer to look at a line of various stats--such as EPA / WPA / AY / Success Rate (SR). In the example above the two QBs' season stats might look like this:
Farley +100 EPA / +1.2 WPA / 5.5 AY / 50.1% SR
Andrews +85 EPA / +3.2 WPA / 4.2 AY / 45.1% SR
This is far richer information. We can see who was more consistent, who was more productive overall, who relied on his receivers' YAC, and who was luckier (or 'clutch' if you prefer). We can get an idea of who is more likely to repeat his above average performance into the near future. A single number can't tell us anything like that. This is not an indictment of QBR, just my own preference.
If I were to settle on a single number, it would be WPA/LI, as Tom Tango has suggested. One day I'll get around to settling on a good definition of how to define typical football 'successes' and 'failures' in terms of a swing in WPA. It's worth several posts and a healthy discussion with the community. Until then, my LI stat is just a work in progress.
Ultimately, I think QBR is interesting and is a thousand times better than the traditional passer rating. But it's not very useful outside of ranking QBs from top to bottom. It might be fun fodder for discussion on TV or Internet message boards, but it's hard to see how it's useful beyond that.
I like the Texans, Jags, Rams and Raiders. Green Bay should show a sexy woman packing her purse.
Chargers are electricity not a horse ever.
Adam Schefter ‏@AdamSchefter 33s
Filed to ESPN: Browns RB Trent Richardson to Indy for Colts' first-round pick.
Details
Adam Schefter ‏@AdamSchefter 10s
Filed to ESPN: Browns RB Trent Richardson to Indy for Colts' first-round pick.
Wow
Browns gaf... :'(
Holy crap, I thought the first post was just a joke. That's nuts.
For the first time ever Irsay wasn't kidding.
Adam Schefter ‏@AdamSchefter 10s
Filed to ESPN: Browns RB Trent Richardson to Indy for Colts' first-round pick.
Wow
Adam Schefter ‏@AdamSchefter 10s
Filed to ESPN: Browns RB Trent Richardson to Indy for Colts' first-round pick.
Wow
I got meetings tomorrow so I can't go. I'm hoping to get one after work tomorrow but I know it's impossible.
I found Lunchbox on the internet.
You can hardly make a dolphin look tough. Saints obviously have a similar issue.Yeah I didn't get the chargers one at all, I like the browns, jags and KC. The dolphins one is clever but the dolphins looks stupid.
I'm waiting for the crying chick gif from Kave. I get equal parts laughter and feeling terribly bad for him out of it.KAVE ARE YOU OKAY? PLEASE POST IF YOU ARE OKAY?!
Wow, that came out of left field. This NFL season is nuts.
You can hardly make a dolphin look tough. Saints obviously have a similar issue.