You're not wrong about that, for the most part. The exception is that good teams are talked about more each season and it changes the kind of conversations had for match ups and a team's potential in seasons where the teams are largely filled with the same players. The Sea Hawks for example are still considered a top team by many and expected to win the division by most because of what they've done the last two years with the same players. They are awful so far this year but not looked at that way because of success despite not winning last year. If you jump ten years then you're right, people won't remember much outside the winners besides maybe what teams were good for stretch and kept making the play offs. But I'm not talking about anytime but right now. This Cardinal team is very good and has a chance to be a champion. Maybe they'll meet your standards for relevance and maybe they won't, too early for either of us to say. You've already shifted from thinking we wouldn't make the playoffs to making it now though
Also, do you still like the Giants and Falcons more after one barely beat your trash team when we blowed you the fuck out and the other struggled mightily against the Redskins? People rag on who we've played but the Falcons have been playing the NFC East and the Texans ffs and barely winning most of those matches! Whatever, you just have no concept of who's good. It's ok