Goro Majima
Kitty Genovese Member
What are sanjuro's thoughts about a good quarterback getting benched for another good quarterback?
Someone buy me psvr
Dak isn't playing well enough to justify benching a guy who, the last time he was on the field, was a top 3 QB.
If he plays worse or gets injured again, we've got a proven, reliable back-up. If he plays at 2014 level, we're a better team. The opportunity cost of not giving him a shot is too high.
I don't buy into media narratives about players getting their feelings hurt about being benched for better players, especially not based on what we know about Dak's personality. He ain't no Brock Osweiler.
What are sanjuro's thoughts about a good quarterback getting benched for another good quarterback?
Fact #1: Tony Romo is a much better QB than Dak Prescott.
I love Dak but aside from the two throws to end the first half, he didn't play well in that victory last week. 2 fumbles, an INT and a host of bad throws.
If Tony is healthy, start him against the Browns and see what we got.
This voodoo shit about stopping momentum or jinxing this winning streak is garbage.
YMMV
Bledsoe > Brady
Peyton > Brock
Dak > Romo
I expected more anger and stress eating from my question.
That's what I said, then got boo hooed because people don't find stories and backslides interesting.The 30 for 30 on his swift decline is going to be great. He's going to have Kurt Warner resurgence, of course
Renounce the Patriots.Someone buy me psvr
I don't agree that Romo would have this team playing better than Dak. He is boom or bust in terms of drive production/success (3 and out vs a drive that goes somewhere). I don't know if Romo has ever had a string of games like this in his entire career in terms of 8 to 10 minute drives or just the amount of 10+ play drives.
I love youRenounce the Patriots.
Admit that they are cheaters and that everything that they did is tainted.
Further admit that Brady and the rest of them are racist Trump supporters.
Do this in writing and get it notarized and I will get you the videogame thing.
Renounce the Patriots.
Admit that they are cheaters and that everything that they did is tainted.
Further admit that Brady and the rest of them are racist Trump supporters.
Do this in writing and get it notarized and I will get you the videogame thing.
Renounce the Patriots.
Admit that they are cheaters and that everything that they did is tainted.
Further admit that Brady and the rest of them are racist Trump supporters.
Do this in writing and get it notarized and I will get you the videogame thing.
So 2014 never happened?
I don't agree that Romo would have this team playing better than Dak. He is boom or bust in terms of drive production/success (3 and out vs a drive that goes somewhere). I don't know if Romo has ever had a string of games like this in his entire career in terms of 8 to 10 minute drives or just the amount of 10+ play drives.
2014? That's way back when A-Rod was a good QB.Dak isn't playing well enough to justify benching a guy who, the last time he was on the field, was a top 3 QB.
If he plays worse or gets injured again, we've got a proven, reliable back-up. If he plays at 2014 level, we're a better team. The opportunity cost of not giving him a shot is too high.
I don't buy into media narratives about players getting their feelings hurt about being benched for better players, especially not based on what we know about Dak's personality. He ain't no Brock Osweiler.
Someone buy me psvr
2014? That's way back when A-Rod was a good QB.
It did, and it was his best year, and he threw the ball less than any other season. And he still managed numerous 3 and outs while protecting a lead.
And that was one season.
His time away from the field is a valid concern. However, that's why god created the Cleveland Browns. You can have a scrimmage in the middle of the season.
i would do thisRenounce the Patriots.
Admit that they are cheaters and that everything that they did is tainted.
Further admit that Brady and the rest of them are racist Trump supporters.
Do this in writing and get it notarized and I will get you the videogame thing.
NoRenounce the Patriots.
Admit that they are cheaters and that everything that they did is tainted.
Further admit that Brady and the rest of them are racist Trump supporters.
Do this in writing and get it notarized and I will get you the videogame thing.
This is true. It's why starting Wentz week 1 was so perfect. I wish him nothing but failure.His time away from the field is a valid concern. However, that's why god created the Cleveland Browns. You can have a scrimmage in the middle of the season.
Most casuals and analysts have not seen Rodgers play in awhile so they think he is still the best.Oh I agree that this past week was Dak's worst game, and I dont understand why it was that game that seemed to turn the media opinion completely in his favor. Just the whole Green Bay lore.
ToP means something if your are getting into scoring position. I agree that it alone does not mean much.
Let's not forget how 2014 ended. 4th and short, best run game in the league and he audibles to a deep pass.
Then let's look at how he got himself injured this preseason. Scrambling out of the pocket, tries to slide while behind the line of scrimmage instead of just throwing it out of bounds? Those two plays are pretty much his decision making summed up nicely.
You have an Arian Foster clone. That's good enough.
Stats from 2014 are great, but the most important stats are Games Played, and in the past two years Romo has played 4 games. He is 36 coming off multiple surgeries, back surgeries at that.
I don't expect him to be as effective or to stay healthy when he needs to move around. Romo has always been very dependent on his ability to move in the pocket, without that shifty-ness I doubt he is anywhere as good as he's been in the past. Dak is the QB of the future, let him do his thing.
Which is why the NFL JV squad the Browns are a perfect team to play him in.
If you could make a deal with the devil whereby your favorite team will win this years Super Bowl, but Donald Trump wins the presidency, would you do it? Also how quickly would Bionic say yes?
This tells me that Romo was more vital to scoring drives/keeping drives alive than the rushing game.
this is some father-son relationship
I don't agree that Romo would have this team playing better than Dak. He is boom or bust in terms of drive production/success (3 and out vs a drive that goes somewhere). I don't know if Romo has ever had a string of games like this in his entire career in terms of 8 to 10 minute drives or just the amount of 10+ play drives.
I know everyone likes to shit on the Browns but they still have people who can hit the QB. Romo still scrambles. Look at the hit he took from Bennett, it wasn't even hard. It was awkward, you're going to take 4-5 hits like that a game. I don't trust his ability to stay upright.
Depends, how many of those passing 1st downs were on 2nd or 3rd and less than five after successful run plays, or how many were on play action and fueled by the run? My old football sensibility says the easiest 3rd down conversion is a short pass play after two positive runs. So you should have more passing convetsions than runs. Certainly you can't do that exclusively but it's the basis for sustaining long drives when your qb is not brady or manning.
To be clear, I do not think Romo is garbage. His career has been an incredible success story. But it probably should be over. At least as a starter.
Sanjuro probably enjoying early dinner to not be saltyI expected more anger and stress eating from my question.
That is bullshit and you know it, sounds like an ESPN insider hot take of shit.
I don't see how that statement is at all scathing.