ugh, we resigned Erik Walden. Fuck that noise.
Doesn't sound like there is any guaranteed money involved so he's still likely to be cut imo.
ugh, we resigned Erik Walden. Fuck that noise.
I believe two years in double digits million area, roughly. Though I'd expect he would need to restructure before the trade is done.
Edit: According to ESPN:
.
No way will the Eagles keep him. Just wait for him to be released and enter the bidding war.
No way will the Eagles keep him. Just wait for him to be released and enter the bidding war.
Clayton Bigsby said:Peyton is/was an elite player who also was a good guy. Eli is just bitch made.
Exactly. Everybody just needs to sit tight and he'll be cut.
Maybe the Falcons want to avoid a bidding war because its likely someone would overpay him.
Brent Grimes will play the 2012 season for a guaranteed salary of $10.3 million after signing the franchise tender.
The Falcons have announced that Grimes, a cornerback who has played his entire five-year NFL career in Atlanta, signed the tag today.
If I'm Sameul though, why do I agree to restructure my contract? I would wait it out and have my pick of teams in free agency. No one's going to trade the Eagles anything if he doesn't restructure.
He'll probably get more guaranteed money through a restructure than a FA contract.
Out of respect for retired, average defensive lineman Cornelius Griffin.RG3 will be "Griffin III" on his jersey
nice..
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...-and-the-caps/2012/04/24/gIQAFXKSeT_blog.html
Moving to Dallas in two months.
That's like moving to football's Sodom.
It's superior to Cleveland and Detroit by leaps and bounds.
Speaking of Cleveland, why hasn't jdez made his triumphant return to proclaim that the Browns will trade up for Luck and they're going to win the Super Bowl next year.
C'mon, Mrs. jdez! We're not that bad, I'll even start censoring out my m*****f****** g****** curse words!
mister freeman ginormous?m*****f****** g******
Hugh Douglas is on First Take saying that eavesdropping offers no advantages because the Saints didn't win many games while it allegedly happened, and play calling terminology is so complicated that you wouldn't be able to tell more than it being a run or pass play. And knowing if it's run or pass isn't an advantage because the players on the field already know if it's going to be run or pass.
not enough :jnc
Hugh Douglas is on First Take saying that eavesdropping offers no advantages because the Saints didn't win many games while it allegedly happened, and play calling terminology is so complicated that you wouldn't be able to tell more than it being a run or pass play. And knowing if it's run or pass isn't an advantage because the players on the field already know if it's going to be run or pass.
not enough :jnc
Hugh Douglas is on First Take saying that eavesdropping offers no advantages because the Saints didn't win many games while it allegedly happened, and play calling terminology is so complicated that you wouldn't be able to tell more than it being a run or pass play. And knowing if it's run or pass isn't an advantage because the players on the field already know if it's going to be run or pass.
not enough :jnc
Then why does play action work Hugh! Why!!!!!
I'm always entertained.First Take has become an all-out contest to see who can out-troll (out-stupid) Skip.
The defense doesn't want the eavesdropping to seem too obvious, so they let those slide.Then why does play action work Hugh! Why!!!!!
Hugh Douglas is on First Take saying that eavesdropping offers no advantages because the Saints didn't win many games while it allegedly happened, and play calling terminology is so complicated that you wouldn't be able to tell more than it being a run or pass play. And knowing if it's run or pass isn't an advantage because the players on the field already know if it's going to be run or pass.
not enough :jnc
Jerome Simpson to the Vikings?
Im cool with it. Him and Percy can start a pot ring in the twin cities.
I'm always entertained.
Unless Jemele Hill is on.
The defense doesn't want the eavesdropping to seem too obvious, so they let those slide.
How long will he be suspended for?
Who is this Jemele Hill guy? I've never heard of him? Some shitty NBA writer I assume?
3 games.
:jncWho is this Jemele Hill guy? I've never heard of him? Some shitty NBA writer I assume?
Yeah, I thought he'd back down from his stance a bit, but then he tried to validate the whole thing by bringing up the Saints' record during when it would've happened. So sad that he gets paid for that job.I honestly don't get how somebody who actually played NFL football can make an asinine statement like this. Does he truly not understand how that would help?
NFL-GAF browsing +1I'm done moving! Yay!
Super duper fast internet! Yay!
Knowing the exact play can't fix a bad player.Like on 4th and 26?
....I'm still mad. I hope you choke Nick Barnett!
I don't get it.
That is Jemele Hill.
Ah. Was I right, is she an NBA writer?
She is a Black writer
Her writings are dark and humorless?
Racist.Her writings are dark and humorless?
She is boring, dumb and has nothing to say.Her writings are dark and humorless?
She is boring, dumb and has nothing to say.
Yeah, I can't watch the show when she is on.Hill is the fucking worst.
What do you think of a family paying $100 grand to spend a day with tebow?
No one would pay that much if he was black!
-Her typical arguments
So, mwsnatural is a daily reader?
Hill is the fucking worst.
The Outside the Lines reporter (John Barr, I think) was on Mike and Mike this morning and said that there was a negative league-wide perception of Sean Payton because any time a reporter or team says something even remotely critical about the Saints he calls them up and berates them with a profanity-laced tirade.
:jnc
Barr was trying to be nice about it, but you could tell people around the league can't stand the guy.
Look who he learned from?
Parcells was notorious for treating reporters like shit.
What do you think of a family paying $100 grand to spend a day with tebow?
No one would pay that much if he was black!
-Her typical arguments