GOAT arguments are the fucking worst.
Who gives a shit?
Otto Graham was the best because 6 championships, duh. Ignore the fact that he was only playing when slow ass white dudes stumbling through mud was considered athletic.
There's nothing to talk about now until the Combine.
Word on twitter is New England baited Seattle to throw
They did. If you go by the book, everything that NE showed in their formation points to throwing a pass.
And Bevell took the bait like the sucker he is.
Ok and that's your opinion, for some reason the stylistic flash is enough to sway your opinion. For others the fact that Tom has a higher winning percentage, scored more points per game, been to more superbowls, set all the superbowl records, will be enough to break the tie.
It's not just stylistic flash. It's making a difficult play that is the difference between winning and losing. Jordan misses The Shot and the Bulls lose.
Anyway, I never said you weren't entitled to your opinion, I just said that if you surveyed most football fans in this country, you'd probably find that more of them agree with me than would with you.
1) Why? This is like the clutch argument against Alex Rodriguez back in the day. Brady's production in the SB is the second best ever.
2) Because one minute of game clock, according to you, makes a difference in a 'signature play'. Brady was 13 for 15 with 2 TDs in the fourth quarter of a Super Bowl. I'll just say that's a signature quarter for him and move on.
1) You're right, but it's second-best to the guy you're (not you specifically, unless you do actually think Brady is the GOAT) trying to rank him above.
2) You completely misinterpreted that post. The point was that the game is not over if Brady doesn't score the go-ahead TD. There's still time left. If Butler doesn't make that interception and Lockette catches a TD, the game is pretty much over. That's why the interception was the signature play, because it effectively ended the game.
