Spire said:OFF: 95
DEF: 93
GOA: 92
And WTF, Kovalev? How old are these rosters? We've known since May he wouldn't be playing for us.
OnPoint said:Wow the Sabres rating is pretty damn good.
Go Buffalo!
Why do the Caps have a 95 at goal? Volkun is good but that good? I dunno about that...
Also the Leafs with a 92 offense. Haha why so high
I'm thinking Howard should be about 85 and Conklin 75-80 so it's somewhat low but not outrageously so.CrazedArabMan said:WTF indeed to those ratings for the Pens, wow is that way high.
Our goaltending is a 79!!! Ok, sure thing EA, Howard and Conklin aren't the best but come on now, that is way low, I would have settled fine with a mid 80's or so.
On second note it looks like the goalie ratings are all lower this year for some reason.
CrazedArabMan said:The ratings seemed really screwed up this year for some reason. I was just taking a look at NHL 11 and most teams are rated in the mid to high 80's for all three categories. But this year they seemed to have rated all of the offense and defense very high, like high 80's low 90's. But the goal-tending is in the mid to high 70's, with a few teams in the mid to high 80's. I don't know, they really changed it up this year. :/
I'm in the same boat; I had the game preordered and paid-in-full and the demo (among other factors) led me to cancel it. The team's gusto - as evidenced by the blog and "unveil" videos show it - sadly doesn't seem like it translated into the game. It really feels incremental at best as far as improvements and a lot of 11's problems haven't gone away.pringles said:I'm thinking Howard should be about 85 and Conklin 75-80 so it's somewhat low but not outrageously so.
In other news, my hype for this game is extremely low. Thread title is so correct. When I was playing the demo I struggled to find things that were new or different compared to 11.
I'll buy it for EASHL but probably not on launch day.
Square Triangle said:
However, some goals arent deserved. Refs blow calls regarding goaltender interference (leaving an open net), and defensemen are too lax in denying wraparounds or cuts toward the crease.
Spike said:I was watching EP Daily last night, and there was a segment on NHL 12. EA Canada brought the game to a hockey skills competition and let the players try out the game. During the interview with the EA rep, he commented about how the players thought it was NHL 11 they were playing and were surprised when they were told it was NHL 12.
Oh, EA...
CrazedArabMan said:WTF indeed to those ratings for the Pens, wow is that way high.
Razorskin said:91 Offense for the Habs, what the fuck I wish.
sefskillz said:i dunno but i bet it was salary cap related
GBONZZZZ said:No Winnipeg Jets edition cover art?
Cactus said:Leafs player ratings seem reasonable. I think Grabovski should be 2 or 3 points higher and Komisarek should be at least 4 points lower, though.
73 Goaltending is hilarious. Unless Reimer is under 80, Gustavsson must be rated really fucking low.
Kinda hard to do when they just released the jerseys today.GBONZZZZ said:No Winnipeg Jets edition cover art?
GBONZZZZ said:No Winnipeg Jets edition cover art?
Rypien too.RS4- said:I wonder what they'll do with Belak as he's still in the game
You are a rare breed. That jersey was almost as hated as the buffaslug when it was first released.Sleep Arrest said:Look, EA.
WHY THE HELL CAN'T I HAVE THE BLACK AND RED SABRES JERSEYS???
You put so much effort into every other team, what the hell dudes?
Love,
A concerned Buffalo fan.
PS, Buffalo's rating is off the god damned chain....
Boosts are still the same. Requirements to unlock them may have changed a little though.GloomyHitsuji said:Oh man, Can't wait! Only 1 more week.
Now, to decide, what mode I should play first...
Anyone have any info on boosts? I haven't heard anything about it.
bradigor said:Oh come on. Tuner updates will fix some goalscoring issues.
Also, unless that 8.75 rating is out of 100, then really? It is basically 9/10.
Still looking forward to this personally.
SuperSonic1305 said:I want that Kessel cover so bad but I already pre-ordered at best buy for $40 months ago.
Something Wicked said:Are you sure he'd be able to fit on the cover though?
My thoughts exactly :lolRazorskin said:91 Offense for the Habs, what the fuck I wish.
shagg_187 said:I wish they realistically reset all stats.
If Luongo is 97, then Thomas better be 100.
Putting in a proper puck/shooting physics engine would help a ton. It's way too easy to pick the top corners or get good shots off despite being in a terrible position. The lessened speed on deking will help and I like that shots seem to miss the net more in 12, but there's a long way to go. Goalie AI needs a huge overhaul as well.Plinko said:Key word here is "Some." Yet, for some reason, the glitch goals that exist take years to fix. I've still got it preordered for release date delivery but I can still complain about the glitch goals.
Marvie_3 said:Putting in a proper puck/shooting physics engine would help a ton. It's way too easy to pick the top corners or get good shots off despite being in a terrible position. The lessened speed on deking will help and I like that shots seem to miss the net more in 12, but there's a long way to go. Goalie AI needs a huge overhaul as well.
Fixed1979 said:Why, if it's based on regular season?
EDIT: I'm surprised that there's such a gap with Luongo in front but realistically their seasons were close enough to warrant the same or similar numbers in a video game.
They need to get rid of a player's ability to stop/start/cut on a dime too. Can't stand the figure skatersPlinko said:I absolutely love the adjusted deking in the demo. That should help a ton.
wow, they must've really thinned him out in photoshopSuperSonic1305 said:Your attempted fat joke is lessened by the fact that the cover is in the OP and it has multiple other players on it along with Kessel.