Does a pleasant lunch with Mike Fisher mean Carrie Underwood would be present?
oprah will mediate
http://youtu.be/hWiw8U6N78g#t=5m45s
Does a pleasant lunch with Mike Fisher mean Carrie Underwood would be present?
I guess it's back to doom and gloom for all the Flyers fans.
"Yep, that's right babe. I'm still collecting money from the Leafs."
Pleasant lunch must be included in all contract negotiations, NHLPA demands.
"You know, I really liked the pleasant lunch I had with Vancouver, but they were coming on too strong. Philadelphia's pleasant lunch was pleasant, too. Montreal's pleasant lunch was pretty good, but too many French people. I really did enjoy all those pleasant lunches."
just remembered that montreal's coach is therrien
still can't understand how rangers got nash for so little
And were in the East.They were on Nash's list and could give up some assets ?
Have many times have the Rangers been burned by going out and acquiring the highest priced talent? It rarely works, and they finally had a winning formula going there, why they felt the need to mess with it is beyond me. Slight tinkering, sure, but this is a major move.
Either way, NYR got the better player, but I think Columbus is the better "team" after the trade.
Have many times have the Rangers been burned by going out and acquiring the highest priced talent? It rarely works, and they finally had a winning formula going there, why they felt the need to mess with it is beyond me. Slight tinkering, sure, but this is a major move.
Either way, NYR got the better player, but I think Columbus is the better "team" after the trade.
Have many times have the Rangers been burned by going out and acquiring the highest priced talent? It rarely works, and they finally had a winning formula going there, why they felt the need to mess with it is beyond me. Slight tinkering, sure, but this is a major move.
Either way, NYR got the better player, but I think Columbus is the better "team" after the trade.
BAM IN YO FACE KINGHENRIKI never claimed to be an analysis expert, just seems risky to me was all. No offense intended.
Oh crap Parise isn't with the Devils anymore...
I think i'm going dumb
You're not very good at, uh, "Analysis".
Trading expendable parts for a star
Signing a guy who has scored over 100 goals in his first three years (Gaborik)
Signing a guy who had brought the team overall to another level (Richards).
...what the hell. That's the same suit he was wearing at my brother-in-law's wedding in June. I thought NHL players got paid big money?
"Yep, that's right babe. I'm still collecting money from the Leafs."
Bro in law wedding? Story?...what the hell. That's the same suit he was wearing at my brother-in-law's wedding in June. I thought NHL players got paid big money?
C'mon now one of those is currently not like the others. Paying Richards 12 million to score 66 points can't be considered a success right? To me New York took those big steps forward mainly because of the defensive system this year and had very little to do with Richards. This is highlighted by the fact that they actually scored fewer goals this year than they did last (226 vs 230).
Intangibles man. Intangibles
Bringing in Richards has helped with the renewed success of MDZ, growth of Stepan, and the rest of our young kids. He also scored a ton of big goals.
And he was a beast in the playoffs, the only part of the season that really matters.
Richards has been worth every penny
This is known as the "Briere Method" of calculating value.
You guys need a home for gifted youngsters... Except don't do it because we did it first and fuck the Rangers. Also, there's a possibility (still being researched) that this only works with French Canadians.
Still a couple of pieces missing on the Rangers really, though they're definitely a contender.
Another 3rd pairing D, preferably a RH with decent physicality. Sauer is that guy, but we have no real idea what's gonna happen with him yet. I'd like to see another 3C because I'm not all that happy going into the season with a tandem of Boyle/Halpern for that position, but I can't really see who now. I was kinda hoping they'd get a guy like Colin Wilson, especially at what he signed for.
That said, I'd love to see Doan sign a 2x5.5 (or similar) with us more than anything, because as happy as I am that we got Nash for what we did, and as much as I think he really will do well with us, I think a guy like Doan does a lot also. The two of them together added to this roster would be fantastic. Then pray for a relatively injury-free season like last year, a healthy Sauer returning and playing to pre-concussion form, along with the expected natural progression of Kreider and Hagelin... and well, that's a lot to ask =)
I'm with you on another D, but they can always pick that guy up midseason/trade deadline if nothing comes from it in the offseason. I think Doan is a real possibility. I'm fine with Boyle as 3rd line C. He's great on faceoffs and he's great defensively.
Trade demand, short list and big cap hit means disadvantage seller. I'd bet that this offer was made months ago but Columbus was hoping for Nash to add teams to maybe get more or at least force more from NY.still can't understand how rangers got nash for so little
Doan will probably get at least four years from someone.That said, I'd love to see Doan sign a 2x5.5 (or similar) with us more than anything, because as happy as I am that we got Nash for what we did, and as much as I think he really will do well with us, I think a guy like Doan does a lot also. The two of them together added to this roster would be fantastic.
Doan will probably get at least four years from someone.
Let's watch women's soccer.
Trade demand, short list and big cap hit means disadvantage seller. I'd bet that this offer was made months ago but Columbus was hoping for Nash to add teams to maybe get more or at least force more from NY.
Maybe. I'd like him to sign with the Canucks since he'd be a great fit in our top six, but I think Holmgren would be more willing than Gillis to give Doan the contract that he wants. Personally I wouldn't want the Canucks giving him 4x6M or anything like that.The Flyers, lots of cap room plus they are looking to add someone after what happened with Weber.
Maybe. I'd like him to sign with the Canucks since he'd be a great fit in our top six, but I think Holmgren would be more willing than Gillis to give Doan the contract that he wants. Personally I wouldn't want the Canucks giving him 4x6M or anything like that.
The Flyers, lots of cap room plus they are looking to add someone after what happened with Weber.
Four years. $10m, $10m, $3m, $1m.
Four years. $10m, $10m, $3m, $1m.
And I hope they're working on a trade for Yandle.
Shane Doan has laid down another deadline, this time one directed at the Phoenix Coyotes.
According to the Phoenix Business Journal, Doan has given prospective Coyotes owner Greg Jamison until Friday to make progress or get close to finalizing the sale of the NHL-owner team. If that doesn't happen, the unrestricted free agent will likely take his services elsewhere.
Doan has visited with the New York Rangers and Philadelphia Flyers in an effort to get a feel for the market in case the sale of the Coyotes to Jamison falls through, according to his agent, Terry Bross.
"When we get the news, whether it's good or bad, at least we'll be prepared," Bross told USA Today. "Otherwise we'll have to take a week to make a decision. If we find out it doesn't happen, then we're behind the eight-ball trying to go visit teams and make a decision.
"Let's get them out of the way now. If it works (with the Coyotes), great. If it doesn't, we've got a feel for the other places."
Doan is planning a visit to the Montreal Canadiens next week, according to TVA Sports.