Spiritual successor to Demon's Souls? That was Dark Souls. So is this an actual sequel to Demon's Souls or another spiritual successor? PS4 exclusive, I guess. That's huge.
Yea I guess they are spiritually successing again or something
Spiritual successor to Demon's Souls? That was Dark Souls. So is this an actual sequel to Demon's Souls or another spiritual successor? PS4 exclusive, I guess. That's huge.
So who do we want to draft boys?
I agree, I just don't know who would trade for DD, even after he's rebounded. Combined with his marriage to Patches, it's an ugly mess.
It will be interesting to see how Bergevin handles this, it is pretty clear A.Gally will be the #1 C eventually. DD's value may never be higher.
I'd love to see Bergevin make a play for Kane in the off season.
Doesn't really matter if it's longer then 2 years, he won't last it.Finally, 2 years for Therrien (with 3rd year option). Anything more is just crazy.
Galchenyuk is 20. - BUST
Gallagher - 22. - MIDGET
Eller - 25. - SUCKS
Pacioretty - 25. - CRIPPLE
Price - 26. - WILL NEVER BE THE SAME AFTER THE INJURY
Subban -25. - DOESN'T PLAY THE RIGHT WAY
Beaulieu -21 - APPEARS TO BE FRENCH
Tinordi - 22 - I DON'T KNOW WHO HE IS SO HE SUCKS TOO
They really should look for someone who's able to play with Subban for 28 mins a game. Gorges is alright, but he needs someone a notch better so he can do what he wants.
Doesn't really matter if it's longer then 2 years, he won't last it.
Maybe Tinordi can be that guy, but even he isn't a perfect fit.
Hmmm, if only we could have drafted a great, left-handed defenceman in the same round that we drafted Subban so they could develop together and form one of the best first pairings in the league. Too bad we only had that one first round draft pick in 2007.
I hear there is that one Rangers D who has 10 points in the series or something? If only you guys had a guy like that eh?
McDougall or something?
I've missed you <3
He was great defensively, too.I hear there is that one Rangers D who has 10 points in the series or something? If only you guys had a guy like that eh?
He was great defensively, too.
Might be an obvious thing to say, but I haven't really heard it said about this series (not that I've had my ear to the ground)..... the Habs' lack of size cost them. They seemed pretty ineffective while cycling and defending the cycle. And they got knocked off the puck easily at times.
Vanek: 7 game playoff goal drought, 1 SOG or fewer in 11 of 17 postseason games
Therrien was great against Cooper and even better against Julien, but couldn't handle AV's tactics or just plain refused to adjust to them. Whatever it was, it was a big part of why they lost. They never adjusted.
From twitter:
Seemed like such a great trade for a time, too.Therrien was great against Cooper and even better against Julien, but couldn't handle AV's tactics or just plain refused to adjust to them. Whatever it was, it was a big part of why they lost. They never adjusted.
From twitter:
It was still a great trade, any time you can acquire a player of Vanek's calibre at the price Bergevin paid, you do it. You just noted how small they seemed this series, Collberg is just another tiny player. Hard to believe he's not playing with an injury or two either.Seemed like such a great trade for a time, too.
Seemed like such a great trade for a time, too.
*barfs* how bout a Clarkson instead?Therrien's system vs the players he actually has. Hard to dump and grind when your average guy is like 5'8". Weise was missed tonight for sure as he's an extra body that actually checks. That's partly why I'm hoping Gionta doesn't get re-signed. He's just not a strong player in a 3rd line role. Those $$millions can get used for a bigger/more intense player.
My buddy is convinced the Habs should trade for Marchand (he's a Bruin fan lol)...ummm yeeaaahhhh
Seemed like such a great trade for a time, too.
Guys, more important things are happening right now then the silly Habs
HNNNNG
What are this?
Can't imagine another team paying the same amount for him after he disappeared at the end there.Vanek is a pure goal scorer. Granted, he didn't score, but not sure what you expect with him on the fourth line or getting half his regular ice time. Not to mention Lundqvist didn't do him any favors.
I know the easy narrative is Vanek is lazy thanks to Don Quick, but look at Montreal's other top scorers for this series, too. I don't think their stat lines will do much for you either.
Vanek is a pure goal scorer. Granted, he didn't score, but not sure what you expect with him on the fourth line or getting half his regular ice time. Not to mention Lundqvist didn't do him any favors.
I know the easy narrative is Vanek is lazy thanks to Don Quick, but look at Montreal's other top scorers for this series, too. I don't think their stat lines will do much for you either.
Maybe he was unhappy being on the 4th line? Though having fewer minutes may also explain an undisclosed injury.We're basing his laziness off watching him. Even in the regular season he was still battling for pucks, in the post season he didn't do anything. I'm not sure how many games you watched but he was quite possibly the laziest player I've ever seen in a lot of games.
Maybe something is wrong with one of his hands because this pure sniper never took any shots.
Maybe he was unhappy being on the 4th line? Though having fewer minutes may also explain an undisclosed injury.
Huh. Then maybe a generic Cherry rant about him being a lazy visor wearing Euro and how Bobby Orr wouldn't have given up would explain it then.He only played on the fourth line the last two games.
Besides one game, Tokarski kept them in it. I don't think you can pin goaltending on this when they couldn't score in the final game.Can't rip the Habs at all. They got further than most expected them to, and I think if Price wasn't injured it could have made a difference. Sure Tokarski played well, but the team would be more confident knowing Price is there and can steal a game for them. Affects the entire team play.
Besides one game, Tokarski kept them in it. I don't think you can pin goaltending on this when they couldn't score in the final game.
Vanek still gonna get paid this offseason.
Ho-Sang would fit the Habs mould of highly skilled but undersized forwards.So who are the young studs I need to be reading about?
Habs have the 27th pick or something?
He sucks without JT, he should take the deal we offered him before the deadline.
Ho-Sang would fit the Habs mould of highly skilled but undersized forwards.
What area do you think your team needs though? The goaltending seems set...
Ho-Sang would fit the Habs mould of highly skilled but undersized forwards.
What area do you think your team needs though? The goaltending seems set...
Way to undermine all those moves, Vanek was one of our MVPs going into the playoffs and was still tied for 2nd in goals on the team while paying almost nothing for him, Weise was one of our best forwards all playoffs in exchange for a guy who was traded twice and isn't even playing, and Weaver was brought in for a 5th round pick and one of our most stable D man and a beast on the PK. Parros, Briere, and Murray signings didn't cost him anything, and Briere was key in the playoffs, he deserves that nomination without a doubt.Bergevin being up for GM of the year is such a farce.
Teams like Florida and Carolina signed top-pairing defensemen (Hainsey and Gilbert) for peanuts. Anaheim got their 2nd line centre (Perreault) for a 4th round pick. Ottawa signed their 1st line winger (MacArthur) for nothing.
Bergevin trades for a 4th line winger, under-performing diva and bottom pairing defenseman, and people are singing his praises? After all the other fuckups he had? (Parros, Briere, Murray)
It's a joke.
Exactly, it's not simply switching out the SV %'s of the two, the team never looked the same once Price was down. It's over now, and Rangers outplayed them regardless.Like I said, having a different guy in net makes the entire team in front of him play differently. Maybe the Habs take more chances with Price in net and it results in more scoring chances -- we'll never know at this point.