2017
Don't be so negative! 2016!
2017
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)It feels good doesn't it?
You like that don't you?
I have him ranked first. If there was a dire need at center I'd consider Matthews..but Laine may be a 60-goal scorer
... LOL.
Scout for McKeens...
Lol come on
Detroit:
All draft picks intact except for this year's 3rd rounder.
Zetterberg is signed for 5 more years at $6M per, and he's 36 in October.
Nyquist scored 17 goals this year, down from 28 and 27 in the past two seasons. He's only 26 and has 3 more years at $4.75M. Not a bad contract if he can bounce back.
Abdelkader, holy cow. 7 years at $4.25M per, and he's already 29. His career high in goals is 23.
Their defence is old. Green is 30, Kronwall 35, Ericsson 32 (and signed for 4 more years).
Howard is 32 and signed for 3 more years at $5.3M per. He has a modified NTC so he's almost impossible to move.
Franzen on LTIR, $4M cap hit, 4 more years, and he's 37 this year. I think he's going to retire.
They have almost $17M in cap space for next year and all their early draft picks so things don't look too bad. But that playoff streak is probably going to end until they can draft some top players (or their prospects take a huge step forward).
McKeens has been doubling down on this since the world juniors. it's pretty dumb.Scout for McKeens...
Lol come on
Laine is going to be hella good.
But anybody with half a brain will still pick Matthews. Can't have a 60 goal scorer with nobody to pass to him, which is the majority of the lottery teams.
We have players to pass to him. If we could get 2nd overall that would be great.
tbh if you guys got rid of McLeod, Roy, and Landesgoon I wouldn't mind.
But the probability of doing all three is so low I'm going to be forced to say hell no I hope you don't get a lottery pick.
Scout for McKeens...
Lol come on
I don't question picking him over Matthews, but saying he can score 60 is ridiculous and unnecessary hyperbole.It's perfectly reasonable to think Laine could be a better player than Matthews. Just like Ovechkin is better than Malkin. His size and goal scoring ability at 17 are incredible, and those two traits are even more coveted nowadays when it's so damn difficult to score goals.
Despite putting the NHL behind every sport, probably curling too for all I know, I want to wish Kave_Man a happy birthday!
Happy birthday to you too, Marvie!
Scout for McKeens...
Lol come on
You forgot McDavid will refuse to report to Edmonton and will demand a trade to Toronto next season (e5).I don't think Toronto will have a dire need for centres since they are projected to have Stamkos, Tavares, Kadri and Nylander down the middle. So I'd be okay with drafting Laine. /s
I'd agree 60 is super unlikely for anyone unless there are significant rule changes.
I saw a proposal to do away with OZ draws and just give the puck to the attacking team recently. Stuff like that could help.
Don't be so negative! 2016!
Why would they? They need a #1 centre to replace Henrik eventually.Canucks could probably pick Laine over Matthews but I'd be extremely happy with either one.
But we'll pick 6th so it wont matter
I really don't want Radulov still. Not last time, not this time.
He's already shit on Americans as well. I think he'd only be happy if we took Chychrun and even then he's American BUT wanted to play for Canada so that may be ok?I kind of want the Leafs to pick 2nd or 3rd just to see Don Cherry shit his pants over a young Leafs core of mostly European players.
I kind of want the Leafs to pick 2nd or 3rd just to see Don Cherry shit his pants over a young Leafs core of mostly European players.
I have to be lol
Nothing has instilled any confidence in me for this game other than the fact that it is a Persona game.
I'll be so happy when Cherry is no longer involved with hockey
I think we'll pick 4th or 5th. 6th would require that neither the Leafs nor Oilers, nor the Canucks, made it into the top 3. That's possible but unlikely.Canucks could probably pick Laine over Matthews but I'd be extremely happy with either one.
But we'll pick 6th so it wont matter
Agreed. We have good center youth, but no #1. Matthews over Laine for sure.Why would they? They need a #1 centre to replace Henrik eventually.
We don't talk about him because he's an obvious bust. It's right there in his name.I'm sad most people don't talk about Jesse Bustjujarvi
Why would they? They need a #1 centre to replace Henrik eventually.
I don't recall him complaining about the Marner pick...?There really is no pleasing Cherry with whoever the leafs pick, he'll find something dumb to complain about.
He wasn't even happy with the Marner pick last year, and that is as close to a Good Local Toronto kid who played in the GTHL drafted at the top of the draft that the leafs will probably ever pick.
He does complain about Nylander though. WE COULD'VE HAD NICK RITCHIE!!!!!!!!!!
I don't recall him complaining about the Marner pick...?
He does complain about Nylander though. WE COULD'VE HAD NICK RITCHIE!!!!!!!!!!
The whole game is a 2002 mess.I really don't like these motion controls in Star Fox Zero :/
I really don't like these motion controls in Star Fox Zero :/
I keep having nightmare thoughts about Subban being traded to Edmonton for their top pick and it makes me want to vomit
In a vacuum? Maybe. In the context of this Habs team and what they need? Absolutely not. The hole on our defence left by moving Subban would just put us back even further then we are now from contender status. You don't trade guys of Subban's calibre, particularly for a teenager who has yet to prove what he can do at the NHL level.You wouldn't take Matthews for Subban?
You wouldn't take Matthews for Subban?